You're right about climate change but you're challenging a shibboleth so good luck, buddy.
I've given up having the 'scientific' argument and just have the moral one; is it right to limit progress? How do we accomplish that without causing net suffering and injustice across the globe? Who gets to decide; and how do I find that nerdy little shit and bust his ass in half with an atomic wedgie?
Are you actually going to tell me what awful ad hominem it was where I wounded you so? Or are you just going to throw the accusation out there, then give me the passive-aggressive silent treatment til we both break down and have wild, animalistic make-up sex? Because I'm good with either option, really, but tbh the not knowing is killing me