JY hasn't legally changed his name, so they are referring to him correctly. In fact, by adding the AKA they're signaling their intent to call him by his colloquial name whilst the legal action commences.
He has changed it tho. It's everywhere on the forum. His legal name is now Jessica Jonathan Yaniv.
If it's a fundraising tactic more than anything else, playing to the base by rejecting Yaniv's pretenses is on target.
This is true. They're setting themselves up for a claim of deliberate misgendering and giving JY a chance to cry martyr at the hate-motivated attack on him etc. etc.
In Canadian civil actions, the general rule of thumb is "ask for as much as you can for as many reasons as you can, because you'll never get it all. " The judge will always lower it. Especially in this case due to the Rebel Media's IRL trolling method of "journalism." They'll likely rule against Yaniv, but reduce the awarded damages because of contributory negligence of the reporter.
I disagree. Rebel reporters are only asking questions that are based on things that Yaniv has done in public view. It isn't their fault that Yaniv is a disgusting piece of shit who does disgusting things.
Yaniv has a history of lashing out at those who try to interview him. Swinging his cane, blocking cars, screaming, and all sorts of hysterics.
I still disagree. The right of a Free Press and all that jazz. Sheila showed up with a security detail for the last report, showing that they are taking reasonable precautions from hence forth.
It's not like Yaniv'll ever pay it anyway. How long ago was he supposed to pay the six thousand?
The courts have the power to garnish any legal earnings the Tardtwat makes to enforce the judgement. I don't believe the BCHRT has those powers.
The tribunal award was registered in the BC Supreme Court registry, so it has the same force and effect of a BCSC judgment. All of the usual remedies of judgment creditors are available, including garnishment.
The action is in battery and assault. These are intentional torts and contributory negligence is not a defence. Yaniv could try a defence of self-defence (lol) or provocation (he won’t meet the legal test unless the judge is utterly credulous).
He could, yes, but given his track record of self-representation, I doubt it would do him any good.
That's like saying parents should keep their kids inside 24/7/365 because the local paedo can't control themselves.
Words mean more than actions in shit world.
Totally agree. If someone had given him a proper shit-kicking when he started repeatedly crossing the creep line he might not be such a fucking degenerate today. He was never made to regulate his behaviour.
He says something like that happened, though. He was a Kwantlen student changing his pad in a college men's washroom when a young man he knew from secondary school entered, spied at Yaniv through the gap between the stall door and wall panel, forced open the stall door, and attacked Yaniv. He was joined by another student Yaniv knew from secondary school, and the attackers "did things" to Yaniv's groin.
I heard that story and found it completely unbelievable immediately. It is a fucking fantasy. Just like Amy Hamm 'viciously sexually assaulting' him is a fantasy. These are things that happened only in his own depraved mind. A good shit kicking means you have to show up at school with a black eye for a week to be reminded of what you did wrong. Not run around screaming that you are a victim because the cool boys touched your balls. He just wants people to touch his genitals so badly he will lie, cheat and sue about it.
I'm talking about legally and medically though.
Just imagine the fun that could be had, though, if they have an outstanding judgement to harass him about not paying.
