Tbh I'd do the same thing out of sheer spite. I can't even imagine how indignifying it must be to go through everything you go through to be where you are as a sitting judge and then get handed a exceptional frivolous case like this just because some neurotic spaz couldn't handle being talked about on the internet.what amuses me is that it's "trial with witnesses" ... so did she go to court with her husband, summon him as witness, plead to the judge to have my kiwizone taken down and them given eleventy million dollars, and then the judge just ruled in favor of the empty defense podium?
two big issuesAre her lawsuits all being thrown out bc she just vomits word salad onto a form instead of hiring a real lawyer?
You'd think someone who "owns her own business" and filled a case for a stalker might have a mild familiarity with these basic rules... or the capacity to use google.1) failing to make a claim [i.e. you have to have a 'tort', or legal reason, to sue someone]
2) subject matter jurisdiction [you cant sue a floridian under virginia law]
these are the two most fundamental building blocks in any case.