The only freedom we have is the moral freedom that even ancient slaves enjoyed. Read Epictetus.Whats a kiwi to do?
The only freedom we have is the moral freedom that even ancient slaves enjoyed. Read Epictetus.Whats a kiwi to do?
They're blocking websites under directive from the AFP too. Not only the eSafety Commissioner.
This video has a list in it.
I used to go to primary school in one of the most Chinese/Korean dominated cities in the state. We had mandatory mandarin classes until grade 4, and we mostly just learned; calligraphy, pronouncing a phrases and words, some mythology, and C-pop. Given the local community, I doubt it was influenced by the CCP, unlike the Confucious Institute-run programs. If anything, the entire place was more influenced by coaching colleges.Speaking of China and Australia....
Don't they also have pretty harsh video game laws? I heard it is/was technically literally illegal for kids to play their equivalent of M-rated games, forced Fallout to change the name of beer items, banned an early 2000's Xbox game for having you spraypaint stuff (wasn't Jet Set Radio), etc.Australia was supposed to ban 4chan a decade ago.
There's a secret list of illegal or immoral websites that Australian sites can't link to unless they like getting fined $10,000 per day. The shitlist got wikileak'd in 2009. Aside from a bunch of fetish porn and illegal shit, ED, 4chan and a couple other chans are on there.
Around the same time there was a proposed national internet filter with two levels: one family friendly level that could be opted out of(porn loicense), and one forced filter that'd block all of the sites on the shitlist and more. With internet porn in jeopardy, people cared for a minute. Millions of dollaridoos were spent trying to make the filter work good, but it was a logistical nightmare, hoes were mad and it kinda just disappeared.
Australia's had really harsh laws surrounding internet content for decades, it's just that they were awkward to do anything with so nobody cared. Now it keeps getting worse.
Not really laws. It's the classification board who's behind that. They've rated some R-rated games (in the US) as MA15+ in Australia. R-18+ is a rather new classification, only being introduced for videogames in 2012. Before that, lots of stuff was censored/banned that the classification board considered as 'adult content'.Don't they also have pretty harsh video game laws? I heard it is/was technically literally illegal for kids to play their equivalent of M-rated games, forced Fallout to change the name of beer items, banned an early 2000's Xbox game for having you spraypaint stuff (wasn't Jet Set Radio), etc.
The eSafety Commissioner will review the content on a weekly basis to determine whether the Christchurch material remains available. If the content relevant to the block is removed the eSafety Commissioner will advise ISPs to unblock the content.
An administrator of a website may also advise the eSafety Commissioner that they have removed the content relevant to the block. If this advice is received the eSafety Commissioner will verify that the content is no longer available and will notify ISPs to unblock the content.
Once a game's been refused classification(RC), it's illegal to sell or advertise in Australia. The punishment and level of restriction varies depending on the state though. WA makes it illegal to possess.Not really laws. It's the classification board who's behind that. They've rated some R-rated games (in the US) as MA15+ in Australia. R-18+ is a rather new classification, only being introduced for videogames in 2012. Before that, lots of stuff was censored/banned that the classification board considered as 'adult content'.
Once a game's been refused classification(RC), it's illegal to sell or advertise in Australia. The punishment and level of restriction varies depending on the state though. WA makes it illegal to possess.
Internet content's judged against the National Classification Code too, it's just more complicated to enforce because internet.
The Christchurch content's a whole other beast. It's an amendment to the Federal Criminal Code Act. The fine for failure to remove's up to 2 million for an individual or 3 years jail time, the reasonable removal time is basically however long the authority decides, maybe a week, maybe an hour. The Amendment apparently makes it possible to go after a foreign website for failing to remove content accessible to Australians as long as the Attorney-General signs off on it. No idea how that'd work out in practice, but I'm guessing having the website blocked kinda protects Kiwifarms from getting a potentially unenforceable, up to 20 million dollar business fine? Idk. 2019 Sharing of Abhorrent Violent Material Act Fact Sheet If you're into that sort of thing.
So basically Null should not do any travel to Australia any time soon.
this shouldn't even be a blip on the radar of any kiwifarm users in Australia, everyone should be using their own dns servers or dns servers that are hosted outside of Ausfalia
loads of sites are blocked already going back years (female squirting porn illegal, small tit porn illegal, ED abo article taken to human rights tribunal and won got it censored off the net)
1.1.1.1 and 1.0.0.1 dns for cloudflare will unblock most blocks in the country (torrents, porn, kiwifarms) but then your archive sites wont work as cloudflare dont like them.... you can set static routes for them but its a pain. I wouldnt use google anything
Australia, a place where the most damming thing to their ecosystem is bunnies, a fine place that lost the great emu war and also bans a farm of flightless birds because of some past issues like an ex girlfriend they don't want to get brought up. It's like if the US tried to censor 9/11. We all know it happened, what's the point in trying to cover it up? I don't understand that.
Is consensual rape porn illegal as well?
Go to Australia, get bitten by a giant deadly spider when having a crap. Not worth.So basically Null should not do any travel to Australia any time soon.
Well oddly KF isn’t blocked for me or the other posters in here. The screen which usually should appear isn’t lulzy but professional. The copyright bans (which are pursued by the companies who own the copyright) usually just have a matter-of-fact explanation of why it’s blocked in bold, large, and centred text. I think the screen for blocks ordered for cyber-safety might be different with a Federal seal, because I recall seeing the seal once. I can’t find the block screen as most browsers interpret it lacking the certificates as malicious.What happens if an Aussie tries to access Kiwifarms? Do they get a lulzy "this site is not trusted" page like they have on sites blocked in the united arab emirates?
View attachment 980119
Someone should start a page on the darkweb archiving every bullshit thing that's being censored.