Probably actually female, since trannies in women's sports weren't as much a thing in 1994-1997.
2019-12-23 - Lindsay B. Lieberman on behalf of "K.W." -
- Thread starter Null
- Start date
- Status
It's the chin. If her jawline was just a little more pronounced, I'd say she was one of the few in the 90's.
IBrokeBob
kiwifarms.net
Kris kardashian makes money off kims leaked porno where rayjay uses her like a toilet, thus creating her nickname kimmode. Kris made some deal with the porno company where she gets a cut. Kim had wanted the video taken off the internet but instead kris brokered a deal where kim and kris got money from it so it lives on in all its glory.
well since kw's daddy went thu so much trouble to try to coverup for his lil ho, Im off to go investigate this lovely train wreck. Thanks dad, i never would have known about your ho daughter if you hadnt started shit with null. Ho ho ho, merry christmas and happy HOlidays.
Miller
kiwifarms.net
I think it depends. There are cases where the scenes are removed from a website at the request of the model. If I'm not mistaken, the girl known as Claire Evans did a couple of scenes for GloryHoleSwallow then later became a good christian girl™ and all of her videos got scrubbed from the website of the company and places like Pornhub (you can still find her scenes elsewhere).
As for "K.W.", I do believe that Facial Abuse deleted all her scenes.
The reason this fucking moron doesn't support the EFF is that they intimately understand the industry, what promotes creative enterprises, and how the DMCA and its facets are too invasive to keep the US competitive long-term. Her entire business is basically sending emails abusing DMCA and the EFF wants to take that toy from her.
It is about power and getting their way. If they wanted this to go away she should have ignored it, or embraced it. The fact that this video is so radioactive is why everyone talks about it.
I dont think that is all prolonged exposure causes...
Or just disguised it as a generic copyright troll campaign and mixed the one with the actual stuff they wanted gone with a bunch of other notifications of similar legitimacy, so it would look like completely unremarkable behavior and not direct attention to the very person who didn't want attention.
The cunt is stupid is what I'm saying.
Miller
kiwifarms.net
She looks like she has JJ Abrams' benisnose.
She does not strike me as particularly subtle either.
Ah ..Christina aka Claire the cock giggler. I know this story quite well...lol.
They did get scrubbed but not just for the reason you are suggesting. When the vids came out and she eventually got doxed by us. She was a member of a church group (ie cult) and I believe she was in some church boot camp/retreat/getaway at the time (where she meets current husband and cult leaders son). When confronted she said she had been forced by her ex bf at the time to do the videos. What she didn't tell them was that she did 4 scenes for gloryholeswallow and many photo shoots, solos and a b/g for FTV. Nor did they ever find out she did 3-4 scenes for Spytug. If you review...sorry research the Spytug videos you can hear that "trademark giggle". Though anonymous and never showing her face the attention whore in her wanted it to be known it was her. Also in the 4th GHS video, there is a short bts cut where they interview Claire and seems out of it. Still giggling like a 10 year old but has a distant stare. X eyes aka Xanax eyes. Years later (in late 2016 I believe), after this video was found she actually dropped by a thread we had and gave us some background info. She spoke with a member and he relayed that her "suitcase pimp" bf pushed her to do the videos. He introduced her to drugs and for about a 6 month period he controlled her life blah blah blah. All the videos she did were in about a 4-6 month period of her life. Anyway, she even said herself she didn't 100% regret (she recanted this some time later) doing the videos . At first it was her choice to do porn but then she says she was forced into doing more video's. First it was porn people who used shady tactics to get her to do more videos then, after seeing the easy money involved, her suitcase pimp bf threatened to out her (which he ended up doing anyway the fn twat). She was cool with thread at first, loving the attention. She even started a Jewtube channel where she answered questions in her first vid but deleted that quickly when confronted about the Spytug videos and her timelines being a bit off. She then got the thread nuked by the site owner. Blackmail is illegal of course and when used for sexual "favors" it is considered rape. So really the forth video is a rape video. Some uploaders had mashed all her GHG videos into one or had taken the best parts and made cumpilation ( besides GHS owner Dirty D the bf actually had the rights to the vids). Sites like PH (with a huge push from anti-porn people like batshit crazy Shelly Lubban AKA Roxy) just decided to wipe them all. The reason they are hard to find on other sites is bc the bf is still around sending take down notices for "his" videos. Now when it comes to the GHG website taking down the videos the reason differs a bit. Dirty D is the king and first person to market the gloryhole genre. From Glory Hole Girlz to Glory Hole Swallow. He also is as greasy as his name suggests. Around the time the church was pushing to get her vids taken down Dirty D was in some legal trouble of his own. Well not just that time but anyway the church is the number one avocate/backer/funder for the anti-porn movement. Laced with heavy propaganda and having many members in the upper court system, it is believed (by Dirty D anyway) they played a part in his conviction for child abuse (sex with a minor) among other charges. I honestly don't know if he was forced to take down the vids or did it to avoid more shit but taken down, none the less. Claire or her bf had mentioned that Dirty D was in fact the one one who came up with the blackmail plan but this is from a suitcase pimp and they rank even lower on the greasy scale then even porn people. Fact is, she has lied (about the Spytug vids and many other things), the bf always told us "half truths" and Dirty D, well is porn people. Hardly a word that comes out thier mouths that isn't a lie. It is what they do. If it wasn't for porn most of these directors, producers and talent would be in, or back in prison, IMPO, where they belong. Fucking degenerates (95% of them anyway). So only they know the real truth. Anyway, Claire married said preachers son, went on to finish school and has BD ( scroll down 3/4 of the page) in criminal justice (ironic.. don't ya think) and every once in a while shows up on threads she is mentioned in. She may be a good christian girl on the outside but deep down, the former ballerina prodigy is a giggling cock/attention whore and is cute af tbh.
Too many, Claire Evans AKA Christina Downward/Thweatt always was a good "Christian girl" but to some of us, she is and always will be, "The Cock Giggler"
Last edited by a moderator:
so there is this concept of paragraphs that the main writers are talking about
Five seconds of research shows the videos are still available on their site. Smut peddlers don’t care about sob stories or finding Jesus.
Nah, I learned a long time ago to expect nothing from anyone. Also, not a nigger but if I was black I think I would prefer to be addressed as darkie. Porch monkey has a nice ring to it and would be my second choice. Regards M
The opposite actually. That shit sells. People love that reluctant Stockholm Syndrome type of porn.
Smut peddlers care about two things, themselves and money. They say getting a video removed is like playing whack a mole. With how safe harbor is set up no one gets held accountable. Site admin are supposed to have a 3 strike rule to fall under the safe harbor umbrella but rarely enforce it. Most just ban the username but how hard is it to just sign up with a different email account. If they wanted to put a damper on piracy they would ban the IP and disallow proxy sign ups. But why would they? They'd be losing money.
It seems like engaging some good SEO guys would have been cheaper than paying these useless broads to attract more attention to this 'intimate video'. What a phrase. I'd like to see what they call 'tender love'. What a bunch of clowns.
If you look at LumenDB, they seem to be doing this nonsense with the initials to try and restrict the extra attention their dishonest DMCA claims bring to the clients they con. I wonder who 'H.I' is?
Yeah, there's basically no reason to believe the story the prostitutes in that case made up at all, especially the more salacious claims. The claim they make about the pornographers posting their personal details is particularly ridiculous- it's a large porn site, men in their lives saw the video, posted their names, people on internet forums collated those names. No mystery there.
Then the one law student they filmed prostituting herself contacted the hundreds of prostitutes that men who knew them (not the GDP producers) had helpfully doxed, and something like twenty of them agreed to make up some shit in exchange for a big payday (incredibly surprising that women who prostitute themselves on camera would lie for money).
I'm sure the GDP guys are greasy, but all pornographers are scum.
Kiketastic!!!! Sheenierific, even.
Photo of K.W. with what appears to ejaculate on her face.
It might possibly be a penis!
It might possibly be a penis!
Think about how many better ways they had to do this. "Kelly Wang" is not exactly a unique name to begin with. SEO, as someone mentioned, could have buried it fine. DMCA the big players- Pornhub, etc because they're big businesses that won't give a shit about losing a video over a legit copyright issue. Name change, not a bad idea. Lock down social media (unless she's a tard, which she must be) and wait a few years. Some people will still know, of course, but you can never stop that. But what you don't fucking do is indiscriminately start sending legal notices to everyone who might have a photo up there, especially if it doesn't even include her name and ESPECIALLY if it's a site like kiwifarms. They could have spent 5 minutes researching the whole New Zealand bruhaha to figure out that this isn't a hill to fight for.
Makes me wonder how many other socialites have similar videos out there floating around but their rich families aren't stupid enough to hire anyone to do this.
I agree. Basically, never, ever hire C.A. Goldberg if you have an intimate video out there. Just let it go, and it'll be buried and forgotten in a sea of free HD porn. These clowns make things worse and even want money for doing so.
This idiot of a lawyer had a client with the Asian version of "Jane Doe" as a name and just had to jump up and down screaming and pointing at her and making sure the entire world knows the one who takes loads in the face from a batch of meth addict porn scum is THIS PARTICULAR "Jane Doe."
Just absolutely genius planning.
- Status
Similar threads
The girl from that one face fucking video newfags ask for a sauce for
