2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Trump vs. Biden

Who is the best choice for President of the United States in 2020?


  • Total voters
    1,483

eternal dog mongler

kiwifarms.net
The most challenging face off for the Incumbent in my opinion is not Biden, who I think would not have the energy to get people to support him, nor Tulsi, as I believe the progressives would not vote for her like in the Clinton case, but Yang, and this is because Yang can legitimately find support from all political sectors, and possibly slam dunk Trump with facts and logic, maybe (didn't work for Clinton), 'free money' is undeniably a voter winner. As for my own opinion on who I would prefer to win, I honestly don't mind either way.
Yang gets it but does not package his message well. Much easier to hate Mexicans than robots, I guess.
 

heyitsmike

The beatings will continue until morale improves.
kiwifarms.net


So anyone who isn't white is poor, huh. That's quite a gaff you've got there, Biden. It's a shame you're not a Republican so we could hear this soundbite played ad nauseam for the next 20 days in a row.
I was told Biden was a gaffe machine. But they were wrong I thought. 'He isn't a gaffe machine, he's a gaffe factory!'

But I was wrong too. He is a gaffe industry. And business is good.
 

The Pink Panther

Pinky "Quartz" Universe
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net


So anyone who isn't white is poor, huh. That's quite a gaff you've got there, Biden. It's a shame you're not a Republican so we could hear this soundbite played ad nauseam for the next 20 days in a row.
Biden is fucking tripping step after step, lol.

I don't think he purposely meant that, it's just his dementia getting to his head, messing up words.
 

heyitsmike

The beatings will continue until morale improves.
kiwifarms.net
Biden is fucking tripping step after step, lol.

I don't think he purposely meant that, it's just his dementia getting to his head, messing up words.
He didn't mean to *say* it, but he meant it. It was your quintessential Freudian slip.

Bigotry by low expectations. That's the name of the game for the left.

Black people: lower expectations.
Women: lower expectations.
Non-straight people: lower expectations.

Their world view relies on an implicit belief that straight white males should be judged harshest and everyone else gets oppression points. It's literal white supremacism and misogyny.
 

It's HK-47

Meatbag's Bounty of Bodies
Local Moderator
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net

eternal dog mongler

kiwifarms.net
I've a Bloomberg article for the story and some random YouTube video if you'd prefer to get the exact, same information from sources that you don't find politically displeasing for whatever ridiculously petty reason.
Yeah, sure. I'm not doubting the story. Just why you're following the Trump War Room.

Trump supporters attacking Biden from the left is, uh, not going to work out well for you guys.
 
Yeah, sure. I'm not doubting the story. Just why you're following the Trump War Room.

Trump supporters attacking Biden from the left is, uh, not going to work out well for you guys.
Your information may be accurate, but you'd have to be a bad person to get it.

Flawless logic there buddy.


So anyone who isn't white is poor, huh. That's quite a gaff you've got there, Biden. It's a shame you're not a Republican so we could hear this soundbite played ad nauseam for the next 20 days in a row.
If it were trump or any republican they'd be playing this over and over and over and over. Ashy would be reciting the line to us hourly.

Although really what he said isn't that awful, even with the gaffe. OK, so if you take his words at face value, white people are the ones who aren't poor. He's claiming non-whites are poor. Oh heavens no, there's nothing a lefty hates more than being told they "aren't privileged".

It tells you he's using "poor kids" to mean "nonwhite" in his head. That's pretty typical democrat...
 

ProgKing of the North

^^^^FUCKTARD^^^^
kiwifarms.net
I've a Bloomberg article for the story and some random YouTube video if you'd prefer to get the exact, same information from sources that you don't find politically displeasing for whatever ridiculously petty reason.
Come on, some of you would be saying the same shit if it were a tweet mocking a Trump gaffe from the “BernieBro commune” or whatever
 

It's HK-47

Meatbag's Bounty of Bodies
Local Moderator
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Yeah, sure. I'm not doubting the story. Just why you're following the Trump War Room.

Trump supporters attacking Biden from the left is, uh, not going to work out well for you guys.
I don't even have a Twitter account. I parse information from Twitter as a whole; I don't use an account because if you have an account they can more-easily limit what Tweets you can see. I don't care where information comes from so long as its first-hand and verifiable. I link to CNN and Washington Post articles just as often as I link to FOX or Daily Caller. It makes no difference at all to me because I don't turn my nose up at information purely because the messenger is supporting a political party that I don't like.

That would be idiotic.
 

eternal dog mongler

kiwifarms.net
I don't even have a Twitter account. I parse information from Twitter as a whole; I don't use an account because if you have an account they can more-easily limit what Tweets you can see. I don't care where information comes from so long as its first-hand and verifiable. I link to CNN and Washington Post articles just as often as I link to FOX or Daily Caller. It makes no difference at all to me because I don't turn my nose up at information purely because the messenger is supporting a political party that I don't like.

That would be idiotic.
And yet you'd link shit from noted non-partisan source Trump War Room? What's next? Breitbart? RT?

We see through this shit, sorry.
 

The Pink Panther

Pinky "Quartz" Universe
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
And yet you'd link shit from noted non-partisan source Trump War Room? What's next? Breitbart? RT?

We see through this shit, sorry.

You're trying way too hard, man. No one cares about the source as long as the source shows evidence for its claims and doesn't deter the context. Now, of course taking it from the Trump War Room, shows that it's a biased right-wing outlet, pro-Trump, but just because we take shit from partisan sources doesn't mean we support said partisan sources. I think CNN is a good source for statistics and more generalized articles (most of the time), but that doesn't mean we support them. They are very much so partisan for the Democratic Party. We could care less as long as the information is backed up by multiple sources, like HK-47 mentioned. The fact that you're complaining is only through your petty hatred of orange man, that doesn't seem like hatred out of genuine complaints for the guy (which a ton can be said, particularly through some of his behaviors and use of social media), but out of a typical try-hard snark that feels like it's out of personal obligation/insecurity rather than objective statements, that of which can be found in many TDS'ers from the TDS thread.
 
And yet you'd link shit from noted non-partisan source Trump War Room? What's next? Breitbart? RT?

We see through this shit, sorry.
What do you "see through"?

HK is looking specifically for news that makes conservatives look good and liberals look bad? No, really? The dude who supports the conservatives and doesn't support the liberals reports things that support his viewpoint?

Nobody ever tried to claim HK was a a neutral bias free media source. If you thought that, you're a fucking moron.

However, all that means is you shouldn't use HK as an unbiased news source. If a biased news source links to a FACT that you can verify for yourself, that has no bearing on the truth or relevance of the fact.

Joe Biden tweeted that. You can see it on twitter, or anywhere else you want. You don't even seem to be saying it's false. You're just throwing vague aspersions about HK's sources like it matters.

What's wrong with linking a well sourced Breitbart or RT article? I mean, yeah, you gotta use diligence and check the sources and shit, but if they check out they check out.
 
Tags
None