2021-01-08 - Adam Kovic: "Non-consensual pornography" -

  • Stealth is back for people browsing at work (it's jank as shit but whatever).
    The email should be working now.

Null

Ooperator
Adam Kovic has filed a complaint alleging that the following URLs are nonconsensual pornography. I have countered claiming they are of public interest.


This is why I was talking about the private tags in the 2021 post. This is the kind of shit people are being permitted to hide.
 

smee

Hired gun.
1610105749053.png
 

AnOminous

shalom motherfucker
True & Honest Fan
Retired Staff
Funny I didn't see anyone there with a gun to his head forcing him to ram dildos up his ass then send it to random strangers. Part of the requirement for revenge porn is there be some expectation of privacy. How the fuck is there an expectation of privacy when you're just sending this shit to random people you don't even know who the fuck they are? They're literally dudes instead of the "chick" who catfished you.
 

AnOminous

shalom motherfucker
True & Honest Fan
Retired Staff
The thread mentions Cal. PC § 647(j)(4). but I doubt that applies outside of CA.
Long-arm statutes generally allow a state to enforce its laws when their effects take place within its borders. What's probably more important is this: "under circumstances in which the persons agree or understand that the image shall remain private[.]" Nobody here agreed to shit with this clown. He was the one who sent this stuff out. The gay catfish might, conceivably, have owed him a duty of privacy but that doesn't magically extend to the entire rest of the world.
 

Yaniv’s Hairy Balls

Behold them and W A X
So, question for the legal kiwis or if null can answer..
What is the difference between this (cat fishing someone’s noodz) and revenge porn? Does is amount to something similar? Is it bc he took and distributed these freely? Bc if you send some shit like this to a stranger then you kind of have to expect this to get out, he’s not like those celebs who got hacked (tho still retards for being in the public eye and doing this). Just kind of curious where the line is, and even if it’s discernible this early. Those laws were just passed a few years ago.
 

AnOminous

shalom motherfucker
True & Honest Fan
Retired Staff
So, question for the legal kiwis or if null can answer..
What is the difference between this (cat fishing someone’s noodz) and revenge porn? Does is amount to something similar? Is it bc he took and distributed these freely? Bc if you send some shit like this to a stranger then you kind of have to expect this to get out, he’s not like those celebs who got hacked (tho still retards for being in the public eye and doing this). Just kind of curious where the line is, and even if it’s discernible this early. Those laws were just passed a few years ago.
Whoever catfished him might have broken the law. I don't know how California does it. The statute just says the person expected privacy, not that it was reasonable to do so. I guess the question is whether you can expect privacy when you're randomly sending out dildo to the ass pics to people when you don't even know who the fuck they are.
 

Psyantroos

let"s trade dox 👁️👄👁️
True & Honest Fan
Always fun when a cow demands something to get removed, only to get assblasted with even more attention towards them. If Adam didn't say shit, people like you and me would have forgotten his silly ass. Oh well Adam.
And everyone who demands that Null take something off this site seems to think they're special enough to make him concede for the first time. "Okay, so the kiwifarms guy doesn't remove stuff often, usually just posts whatever the demand is... but surely being with Rooster Teeth makes me Famous and Intimidating enough, worth a shot!"
 

Similar threads

  • Poll
Rooster Teeth associates who've sent horrifying nudes behind their families's backs in what looks like a gay catfish
Replies
6K
Views
2M
Do you ever wonder why we're still here? Dick pics and sellouts ahoy.
Replies
1K
Views
247K
Top