So, while @Tranhuviya is writing a review of Lind's version of the Turner Diaries, I thought I'd do him a favor by covering this one because nobody and I mean nobody should have to read more than one far right political commentary/militarist wank at a time. Luckily for us, the entire book of "A Desert Called Peace" is available on Baen's website to read for free - so you don't have to pay money for this trash.
I'll start this off with a commentary on the title. It's obviously a take on a very famous quote by Tacitus, a Roman historian, orator, lawyer, and senator. Tacitus probably is most famous for his quote, 'They make a desert, and call it peace' from his book Agricola. I'll spare you the details but basically Tacitus said this: Auferre, trucidare, rapere, falsis nominibus imperium; atque, ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant. That last section is where the desert bit comes in (though it's alternately translates as solitude, or isolation) but it's the first section that everyone forgets about, that I think really matters when it comes to what Tacitus is writing and the general theme of Agricola as a whole. As a whole, the translation I like the most and find the most appropriate in context is the Oxford translation: "To ravage, to slaughter, to usurp under false titles, they call empire; and where they make a desert, they call it peace."
Tacitus' Agricola is full of condemnations like this, but it's not towards who you think it might be. Tacitus is calling out the Romans, his people, for their brutality and loss of virtue, and calling the exploits of his own father-in-law little more than rape and murder for no purpose aside from personal gain under the guise of bringing 'civilization' to the Britons. His comments on the conduct of Rome throughout Agricola repeat this, and throughout even his other works, Tacitus calls into question the morality of Roman conquest, of Roman action, and states that Romans have lost the virtues they once held dear for little more than personal satisfaction, petty vendettas, and pure greed.
To make a desert and call it peace, is not to be interpreted as a good thing for either side, and that the one who makes the desert is himself condemned to that wasteland. I know that some of you have tuned out already, but understanding the lack of understanding Kratman has in even selecting his title, helps a lot. He doesn't understand much.
With that out of the way, here's the blurb from the Baen back cover.
Yep. Totally misses the point Tacitus made. This won't be the end of the Roman references by the way, I'll keep a running drink counter for each one that pops up so the folks at home can play along with me.
's: 1
Moving on into the work itself, It was first published in 2007, which I'm only stating here so you can get the context of his actual preface.
Oh boy, it's a thinly veiled statement on the Iraq War, and how a former Lieutenant Colonel who never commanded an actual battalion or held an equivalent position thinks it should have been done. The same Lt. Colonel who as a junior officer studied swordfighting because he thought that WWIII would descend into trench warfare, and he'd have to lead trench raids. With a sword.
I am going to enjoy the fuck out of this I already know it.
The prologue begins.
's: 2
So we get our introduction to this ominous figure, "The Blue Jinn", a man with striking blue eyes, and totally not Muad'Dib, Paul Atrides. I need to stop reminding myself of far better books I could be reading right now instead of this.
The Blue Jinn is the main character. He's Carerra/Hennessy. The guy who we're supposed to see as the protagonist basically just tacitly approved of rape and slavery, and is totally fine with crucifying people.
Our hero, ladies and gentlemen.
There's also a picture of the world here that they're on Terra, which is basically just the earth upside down. Not shitting you. Go see for yourself.
I'll start this off with a commentary on the title. It's obviously a take on a very famous quote by Tacitus, a Roman historian, orator, lawyer, and senator. Tacitus probably is most famous for his quote, 'They make a desert, and call it peace' from his book Agricola. I'll spare you the details but basically Tacitus said this: Auferre, trucidare, rapere, falsis nominibus imperium; atque, ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant. That last section is where the desert bit comes in (though it's alternately translates as solitude, or isolation) but it's the first section that everyone forgets about, that I think really matters when it comes to what Tacitus is writing and the general theme of Agricola as a whole. As a whole, the translation I like the most and find the most appropriate in context is the Oxford translation: "To ravage, to slaughter, to usurp under false titles, they call empire; and where they make a desert, they call it peace."
Tacitus' Agricola is full of condemnations like this, but it's not towards who you think it might be. Tacitus is calling out the Romans, his people, for their brutality and loss of virtue, and calling the exploits of his own father-in-law little more than rape and murder for no purpose aside from personal gain under the guise of bringing 'civilization' to the Britons. His comments on the conduct of Rome throughout Agricola repeat this, and throughout even his other works, Tacitus calls into question the morality of Roman conquest, of Roman action, and states that Romans have lost the virtues they once held dear for little more than personal satisfaction, petty vendettas, and pure greed.
To make a desert and call it peace, is not to be interpreted as a good thing for either side, and that the one who makes the desert is himself condemned to that wasteland. I know that some of you have tuned out already, but understanding the lack of understanding Kratman has in even selecting his title, helps a lot. He doesn't understand much.
With that out of the way, here's the blurb from the Baen back cover.
A Desert Called Peace said:They should have picked their enemies more carefully.
Five centuries from now, on a remarkably Earthlike planet that is mankind's sole colony in space, religious fanatics called the "Salafi Ikhwan" have murdered the uncle of former colonel Patrick Hennessey. That was their first mistake, because uncle was rich and Hennessey was rather a good colonel. But they also murdered Hennessey's wife, Linda, and their three small children, and that was their worst mistake for she was the only restraint Hennessey had ever accepted.
From the pile of rubble and the pillar of fire that mark the last resting place of Linda Hennessey and her children arises a new warrior—Carrera, scourge of the Salafis. He will forge an army of ruthless fanatics from the decrepit remains of failed state's military. He will wage war across half a world. He will find those who killed his family. He will destroy them, and those who support them, utterly, completely, without restraint or remorse.
Only when he is finished will there be peace: the peace of an empty wind as it blows across a desert strewn with the bones of Carrera's enemies.
Yep. Totally misses the point Tacitus made. This won't be the end of the Roman references by the way, I'll keep a running drink counter for each one that pops up so the folks at home can play along with me.
Moving on into the work itself, It was first published in 2007, which I'm only stating here so you can get the context of his actual preface.
A Desert Called Peace said:Dear Reader:
You can take this book as a commentary on the somewhat cyclic nature of history, if you want. ("History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme.") You can take it as a commentary on the endless war between the Christian or secular West and Islam, if you want. You can take it as a critique of the phenomenon of monocultural planets that dominate science fiction, if you want.
If it pleases you, you can look at it as a cautionary tale on choosing one's enemies well . . . because you are going to become much like them or because they're going to become much like you. If you're of a legalistic mindset, you can think of it as a lengthy commentary on the law of war. If you loath transnational progressivism, surely there is something here for you.
The one thing you must never do, though, it to think of it as a commentary on the current war or the leadership thereof.
Unless, that is, you want to.
Tom Kratman
Oh boy, it's a thinly veiled statement on the Iraq War, and how a former Lieutenant Colonel who never commanded an actual battalion or held an equivalent position thinks it should have been done. The same Lt. Colonel who as a junior officer studied swordfighting because he thought that WWIII would descend into trench warfare, and he'd have to lead trench raids. With a sword.
I am going to enjoy the fuck out of this I already know it.
The prologue begins.
A Desert Called Peace said:Solitudinum faciunt; pacem appellant
(They made a desert and called it peace)
—Tacitus
Prologue said:They called him "the Blue Jinn." He took a small and perverse pride in the title. Blue jinni were evil jinni. That his enemies thought him evil was . . . pleasant. Even more pleasant was the sight of his enemies, beaten and bleeding, captive and bound.
The Jinn looked over those enemies in the late afternoon sun. Sinking in the west, the sun's light was carved by the mountains to cast long, sharp shadows across the ground. Much of that ground was covered with the head-bowed, broken prisoners.
One of those captives, Abdul Aziz ibn Kalb, held his bleeding head upright. Abdul Aziz glared hate at his captors. These were a mix of Pashtun mercenaries—tall and light eyed; light skinned they would have been, too, had the sun not burned them red-brown—and shorter, darker men. All were heavily armed. All sneered back the hate Abdul Aziz felt, mixing with that hate a full measure of disgust and contempt.
Aziz's hate mixed with and fed on fear. Along with several hundred other male prisoners, and nearly a thousand women and children, Aziz waited to hear his fate. The male prisoners' hands and legs were taped together. Not far away, the women and children waited unbound. The two groups were close enough together that Abdul Aziz could see the noncombatants as well as a small group of his enemies ascending a low hill to his front.
Leading that group, Abdul Aziz saw, was a uniformed man, medium in height, and with his face and head wrapped with a keffiyah. Another looked oriental. Three more were dressed much as any mullahs would be. A sixth wore the white dress of the emirate of Doha. The last was another man in uniform, bearing the rank badges of a subadar. Trimly bearded, tall and slender, with bright gray eyes, the subadar looked Pashtun to Abdul Aziz.
That man in the lead partially unwrapped the keffiyah from around his head. Aziz had never seen him before, but had heard enough descriptions to recognize the "Blue Jinn." The Jinn paused and lit a cigarette. He puffed it contemplatively for a few moments. Then he sat back easily in a chair, almost a throne, that had been prepared for him by his followers out of hastily felled and trimmed trees. Even at this distance Abdul Aziz saw the eyes that gave the Jinn his name. Though it was just a trick of the sun, the eyes seemed to glow from the inside like malevolent coals.
So we get our introduction to this ominous figure, "The Blue Jinn", a man with striking blue eyes, and totally not Muad'Dib, Paul Atrides. I need to stop reminding myself of far better books I could be reading right now instead of this.
We get a little more about the Blue Jinn. Not a nice guy.Prologue said:"Your young children shall be taken back to your enemy's country," the mullah continued. "Your women, and the girls over twelve, are awarded to his Pashtun Scouts as prizes. Mr. Yamaguchi," and the mullah's head nodded to indicate the oriental man who had accompanied the party, "and Mr. al Ajami," another head nod, "represent certain interests in Yamato and Doha that might wish to buy some of these women and girls from the Scouts. Having consulted with the Jinn I have informed him that there is no religious prohibition to this, that you are all apostates and your women may properly be enslaved. For his part, he says he could care less what happens to them so long as it is within the law."
Wait. Wait shit.The Jinn's face twitched in the smallest of smiles. "Ah, I see. What does the Holy Koran say about those who bring disorder to the world?
"It says, O Jinn, in Surah Five, the Table, that those who fight against God or his Apostle, bringing disorder to the world, should be killed, or have the hands and feet cut off on opposite sides, or be exiled, or be crucified."
"I see," said the uniformed man. "Do those who kill infant girls fight against God? Have these men brought disorder to the world?"
"They have. They do," answered the mullah, "for this is expressly forbidden under Islam."
The Jinn turned back to his captives. "I loved my family, even as— one supposes—you love your own. I swore, when they were murdered, to avenge myself on all who had contributed, even passively, to my loss. Thus you shall die. I am, though, as Mullah Hassim told you, very solicitous of your fate in the hereafter. So before you die, you will be thoroughly Christianized."
Then the Jinn smiled, nastily, and turned to his subadar.
"Crucify them."
The Blue Jinn is the main character. He's Carerra/Hennessy. The guy who we're supposed to see as the protagonist basically just tacitly approved of rape and slavery, and is totally fine with crucifying people.
Our hero, ladies and gentlemen.
There's also a picture of the world here that they're on Terra, which is basically just the earth upside down. Not shitting you. Go see for yourself.