Not a causation? MONEY MADE A MAN BLOW HIS HEAD OFF WITH A SHOTGUN! and that is just an unpleasant footnote? FUCK YOU REEE. And you have no clue about any of this I HAD TO LIVE THROUG IT FUCKNUT.correlation is not causation, fucktard. that little blurb is current medical consensus on the subject. Money is just an unpleasant footnote in the knowledge base, along with Blanchard, Mayer and McHugh.
Sorry to alert you but it is already started. there is a giant influx of regrets and depressed trenders that got talked into thinking they were trans.Well that's convenient for yourself. Modern transgender ideology is the new lobotomy. There'll be a backlash. And then you'll be an unpleasant footnote.
Sir, this is an Arby's.
It should be noted that this article is from 2010, prior to the removal of Gender Identity Disorder from the chapter on psychosexual disorders and renaming it Gender Dysphoria in a different section. The second article by Julia Serano is from 2020 and completely shreds the theory. I have not read either one in it's entirety yet. Try to keep the discussion reasonably intelligent. Insults will simply be ignored.
Over the last 20 years, Ray Blanchard, Ph.D., with a variety of coauthors and collaborators, has proposed a theory that links the sexual orientation of male-to-female transsexuals with the presence or absence of autogynephilia (erotic arousal by the thought or image of “himself” as a woman). Blanchard's Autogynephilia Theory suggests that the association between sexual orientation and autogynephilia among male-to-female transsexuals is clinically important and the association is always (or almost always) present. Although the theory has been criticized by clinicians, researchers, and transsexuals themselves, it has not been critiqued in a peer-reviewed article previously. This article will attempt to fill that gap. Key studies on which the theory is based will be analyzed and alternative interpretations of the data presented. I conclude that although autogynephilia exists, the theory is flawed.
As a scientist who has written extensively about the field of transgender health, I am always astounded by how often Ray Blanchard’s autogynephilia theory is cited or invoked, given that it has been so resoundingly refuted in the research literature. In this essay, I will attempt to explain why so many people still find the theory compelling, despite its lack of scientific validity. Hopefully, this will be a helpful “explainer” for lay readers who don’t necessarily want to get too “into the weeds” regarding this thirty-year-old sexology theory, but want a general sense of what all the fuss is about.
This essay is divided into three sections: 1) The theory (and the evidence against it) in a nutshell, 2) Trans women’s objections to the theory (on top of it being incorrect), and 3) So who still believes autogynephilia theory, and what are their rationales? A companion essay entitled Autogynephilia, ad hoc hypotheses, and handwaving is in the works (edit 4–5–20: it’s now been published, click the link to read it!); unlike this piece, that one will delve into some of the more esoteric arguments and claims made by those who still adhere to the theory.
You visit here on a regular basis, throw tantrums and spew nonsense until you shit yourself and then claim that we're bigots for laughing when you do so. You do care, Tom. Aside from the crushing loneliness, some of the major reasons you keep coming back here are because you have two extremely childish qualities: a need to never let anyone else have the last word and the fact that you let it eat away at you endlessly if anyone ever dares to tell you that you're wrong. I'm going to give you some good advice becuase I know there's a 0% percent chance you'll take it: if you just laid low online for maybe five, six months instead of sperging here, literally everyone would lose interest in you.I have no fucks to give about that at all.
The concept of "Modern transgender ideology" is a paranoid delusion of toxic transphobic talking turds like yourself. medical consensus is clearly stating that same sex attraction and transgender identities are naturally occurring traits with nothing pathological about them. your transphobia is pathological , scum stain.Well that's convenient for yourself. Modern transgender ideology is the new lobotomy. There'll be a backlash. And then you'll be an unpleasant footnote.
Shut up pedo.The concept of "Modern transgender ideology" is a paranoid delusion of toxic transphobic talking turds like yourself. medical consensus is clearly stating that same sex attraction and transgender identities are naturally occurring traits with nothing pathological about them. your transphobia is pathological , scum stain.
YEA TOM? Then do us all a favor. EXPLAIN the giant rise in regrets now starting to appear. There has been a large growing number of younger people regretting ever taking hormones to begin with. And a new list of dickless males who chopped off their dick and then cried about it at a WWW.TRANSREGRET.COMThe concept of "Modern transgender ideology" is a paranoid delusion of toxic transphobic talking turds like yourself. medical consensus is clearly stating that same sex attraction and transgender identities are naturally occurring traits with nothing pathological about them. your transphobia is pathological , scum stain.
This is why I love KF honest directly to the point. And i see two of my favorite true and honest also agree. @An0minous and @Mariposa ElectriqueTom, you can't peer review anything because that would mean that people see you as their equal. In reality people see you as a piece of shit that's wasting oxygen.
You'll still not be a woman, you'll still have gotten shot for being PossumKin
Blanchard is an intellectually dishonest coward who blocks transgender advocates immediately.View attachment 2175427
Found this on Ray Blanchard's twitter
I have stated no such thing. That is a flagrant misinterpretation and projection of Sneasel/DaisyMae's sick fucking fetishistic fantasies you're repeating, you cretin.Remember, Tom does not want to be a woman.
He has stated he watches child porn and views himself in the role of the molested eight year old girl.
Autogynopedophilia - sexual arousal at the thought or image of oneself as a prepubescent girl
Tom wants to be a female child.
Everything you do is motivated by fetishistic fantasy, you dirty, old man.Blanchard is an intellectually dishonest coward who blocks transgender advocates immediately.
Autogynephilia & Ray Blanchard
A scientific critique of Ray Blanchard's model of transsexuality, autogynephilia and andropihilia, and J. Michael Bailey and Anne Lawrence's account of this theory.www.genderpsychology.org
Blanchard's theories transsexuality are garbage in the face of the factual data, though I'm sure some transsexuals will embrace it. Many of us know ourselves to be the gender opposite our sex long before we even know what sex is about. I had to consciously suppress feminine movement, posturing and speech to pass as male before i could grow a beard. How does any of this fit in with the BAT?
I have stated no such thing. That is a flagrant misinterpretation and projection of Sneasel/DaisyMae's sick fucking fetishistic fantasies you're repeating, you cretin.
Do you look at the Instagram accounts of girls below the age of consent? A lack of response will be taken as a “yes.”I have stated no such thing. That is a flagrant misinterpretation and projection of Sneasel/DaisyMae's sick fucking fetishistic fantasies you're repeating, you cretin.
you seem to have me mistaken for @Daisymae , derp.Everything you do is motivated by fetishistic fantasy, you dirty, old man.
We only tolerate you here for the laughs and to keep a close eye on what your disgusting, mottled, inbred arse is up to.
Your like a fucking spider, you're gross out in the open, but even worse when we don't know where you're at.
I think I'm coming close to cracking the code.Blanchardisan intellectually dishonest coward who blocks transgender advocates immediately.f
Blanchard's theories transsexuality are garbage in theace of the factual data, though I'm suresome transsexuals will embrace it. Many of us know ourselves to be the gender opposite our sex long before we even know what sex is about. I had to consciously suppress feminine movement, posturing andspeech to pass as male before i could grow a beard. How does any of this fit in with the BAT?
I have stated no such thing. That is a flagrant misinterpretation and projection of Sneasel/DaisyMae's sick fucking fetishistic fantasies you're repeating, you cretin.
So are you Thomas. Regardless of Blanchard being a moron that was in a time when we were hated by the medical community and torn apart by the social studies majors like Blanchard is of no concern to you.Blanchard is an intellectually dishonest coward who blocks transgender advocates immediately.
Autogynephilia & Ray Blanchard
A scientific critique of Ray Blanchard's model of transsexuality, autogynephilia and andropihilia, and J. Michael Bailey and Anne Lawrence's account of this theory.www.genderpsychology.org
Blanchard's theories transsexuality are garbage in the face of the factual data, though I'm sure some transsexuals will embrace it. Many of us know ourselves to be the gender opposite our sex long before we even know what sex is about. I had to consciously suppress feminine movement, posturing and speech to pass as male before i could grow a beard. How does any of this fit in with the BAT?
I have stated no such thing. That is a flagrant misinterpretation and projection of Sneasel/DaisyMae's sick fucking fetishistic fantasies you're repeating, you cretin.
No tom there is no mistakes.you seem to have me mistaken for @Daisymae , derp.