A Theory About the Left's Affection for the Criminally Violent.

Suomy Nona

kiwifarms.net
Joined
Nov 24, 2021
Theory:
There are studies* that have discovered that some people(violent criminals) carry genes that predispose them to criminal violence.
Knowing this, and knowing that The Powers That Be and those in their ranks/on their payroll know about these studies(and more related discoveries in the same vein of study and research), it makes sense that the Synagogue of the Intellectual Left would push to recategorize criminals as victims.
It is essentially the same argument they used for homosexuality with the "Born This Way" propaganda campaign. They see violent criminals as "victims of chance"; as being "born this way": They see them as "victims of genetics".
The perspective that the criminally violent are "victims of genetics" concludes that they are devoid of free will and agency, therefore they are not responsible for their actions-absolving them of guilt. They view them as no more guilty a person than one who contracts a genetically transferred disease, aliment, or illness. It's not your fault you have allergies, after all...
And because the justice system does not take genetics or race into account, it is therefore discriminatory, oppressive, systemically racist, etc.
And since this Justice System was designed and constructed by those who do not carry the Crime Genes, it is therefore built to favor them, and intentionally designed to persecute those who do carry the Crime Genes.
Essentially they believe that the Justice System is an unjust system because it does not take into account genetics, race, or IQ, but instead "criminalizes victims of genetics" by "persecuting and discriminating against somebody or someone based on immutable characteristics".
This would explain the lefts affection for the criminally violent. They can't help being violent criminals, they were born that way.

Final thought:
Homosexuality is not considered a crime. Nor is it considered a mental illness. The overall acceptance of homosexuality has paved the way for Transgenderism, and as that begins to settle into a position of acceptance, we are beginning to see the banners and hear the war drums of a new propaganda campaign for the next sexual orientation they seek to normalize and legitimize: Pedophilia.
If they can normalize violent crimes, like murder, the way they have with looting-which is larceny/theft-in places like California, genocide would become legitimate.

Sources:
*https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/01/120125151841.htm
*https://www.sciencerepository.org/the-criminal-behavior-of-genes
 

MysticLord

Pyrotechnics Appreciator
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Nov 12, 2021
Not true, they only support criminals that are libtards or further their cause. If you want to understand them, read Carl Schmitt.

tl;dr: friend good, enemy bad

quote-the-specific-political-distinction-to-which-political-actions-and-motives-can-be-reduced...jpg
 

Dyn

woman respecter
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Oct 19, 2019
The right mindlessly support 'tough on crime' hyperbole without thinking about it.
The left mindlessly support 'understanding and forgiveness' hyperbole without thinking about it.
Most people, right or left, would be horrified to confront the reality of what they're supporting, but nobody wants to really smell the stink of the bureaucratic cruelty in the penal system or the suffering that victims of repeat habitual offenders go through.

There's no need for a big intellectual delve into the other side's small-minded stupidity, or ascribe deepseated biological imperatives to it, y'all are just doing it to spite the other side because people are small-minded and stupid in general, and boiling everything down to left vs right makes things simple and easy.
 

Haim Arlosoroff

We all failed to secure the existence of Linconia.
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Jan 27, 2021
So essentially, the right need to explain their racism as genetic so the left break on the notion that either just because you say something is genetic doesn't make it so, or Rightoids can be racist because we are logically consistent.

The real struggle as I see it is between the left to destroy themselves and the right to get out of their own way and let them. Time and again, who is it that factually supports broken systems? The right-wing. Oh, we try to prevent the left from doing bad things, but we move right to shoring up the foundation quickly after its done. Who still supported Churches that allowed Gay Marriage? Who is trying to keep the military functional dispute a 41% attrition rate in peace-time among a contingent? Who is trying to legitimize America in the eyes of their base while COVID and the 2020 election shook their bases trust? Who argues that race is just skin-color to each and every member of the base of the right-wing when a Black plows into a group of children marching in a Christmas parade? A liberal?
IMG_8785.JPG
You give an inch with a liberal, you get disease.

It should always be like when CHAZ failed, sit back and relax for a time and watch them fail at gardening and civil order after the emotional high of making their own decisions wore off. The Right win when the Left are left to their own consequences and the Left win when they manage to rope the Right into their stupid intuitions over how society does or could work.

I really wish the Left would stop simping for violent criminals like Ted Kaczynski
I wish the right would start, the industrial revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
ted kaczynski funko pop.jpg
 
Last edited:

MysticLord

Pyrotechnics Appreciator
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Nov 12, 2021
So essentially, the right need to explain their racism as genetic so the left break on the notion that either just because you say something is genetic doesn't make it so, or Rightoids can be racist because we are logically consistent.

The real struggle as I see it is between the left to destroy themselves and the right to get out of their own way and let them. Time and again, who is it that factually supports broken systems? The right-wing. Oh, we try to prevent the left from doing bad things, but we move right to shoring up the foundation quickly after its done. Who still supported Churches that allowed Gay Marriage? Who is trying to keep the military functional dispute a 41% attrition rate in peace-time among a contingent? Who is trying to legitimize America in the eyes of their base while COVID and the 2020 election shook their bases trust? Who argues that race is just skin-color to each and every member of the base of the right-wing when a Black plows into a group of children marching in a Christmas parade? A liberal?
View attachment 2749851
You give an inch with a liberal, you get disease.

It should always be like when CHAZ failed, sit back and relax for a time and watch them fail at gardening and civil order after the emotional high of making their own decisions wore off. The Right win when the Left are left to their own consequences and the Left win when they manage to rope the Right into their stupid intuitions over how society does or could work.
This is what a lot of normies think, but the actual right wing politicians understand that their purpose is to be controlled opposition while extracting value for their donors.

The way that politics works if you are right wing is that you get elected not to ensure things function but to hold normalcy hostage, and to do whatever your donors pay you to. Consider how silent Republican office-holders have been since the 2020 election: they are doing nothing while the left tortures normal people because we dared to elect Donald Trump and endanger their grift. This serves a double purpose because by letting the left run wild, they ensure that there will be a huge swing right electorally. They intend to be there when that happens so they can ensure that Principled Conservatism gets their donors tax cuts, government handouts, and unlimited cheap foreign scab labor.

If you are a normal person with normal beliefs, you, everything you own, and everything you've worked for are poker chips for the left in general, and right wing party elites to fight over. They're both vampires, but the right wing party elites are more careful about it.

The solution is to realize that morality is reciprocal: help applies only to allies, neutrality only to neutrals, and harm only to enemies. You are under no obligation to assist those who harm you. You can do whatever you want to them, provided it doesn't harm you. They have lost their right to be considered fellow citizens and should be seen as resources. They are fair game for you to use however you like. You should give no more thought to their well being than you would a beef cow.

With this in mind, how can we best extract resources from say Mitch McConnell or Ted Cruz? How can we do it in a way that is totally legal? How can we do the same to the left? These are the best questions to answer right now.

There's a similar phenomenon going on in every institution. Leftists take control, and they hold productivity hostage if more useless eaters aren't hired. They do this because useless eaters - middlemen, bureaucrats, managers - are their social and economic class, and they are acting in their class interests.

Class interests trump everything. Republican party elites and wannabe elites have more in common with Democrat party elites than they do with those they pretend to represent, which is why they are so visibly sympathetic to leftist causes and why they always give in to the left while maximally restraining the right.

It has nothing to do with conservatism or poor strategy or optics. It is not a question of ideology, incompetence, or cowardice. They are acting in their class interests, as we all do.

For that reason, us normal people should not restrain ourselves when we act out of our class interests except as legally necessary. And by making it a class argument, you bypass race, ethnicity, gender, religion, sexuality, and all the other fracture points which are used to divide and conquer us.

What we need is, basically, a working class party.

I wish the right would start, the industrial revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
View attachment 2749852
The issue is more corporations and overly large polities IMO. If all government were state and local, we'd have fewer problems because people are more conservative about what they know best, and because political struggles wouldn't be zero or negative sum.

The same is true of economics. If we weren't a colony of China (and if you don't think we are, ask yourself why we provide them with raw materials and they sell us finished goods), our economy would be positive sum. Especially with our declining founding stock population. But because it's negative sum, the left (and right elites) fight without restraint to seize other people's property.

Granted, it's not negative sum for everyone. If you are competent, and if the government were competent and less corrupt, then it's positive sum. But the left in general and elites can't function in such an economy, they need to extract rents to survive. They are social and economic parasites. Those who can't survive even with government handouts devolve even further, to the social equivalent of school shooters.
 

Haim Arlosoroff

We all failed to secure the existence of Linconia.
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Jan 27, 2021
This is what a lot of normies think, but the actual right wing politicians understand that their purpose is to be controlled opposition while extracting value for their donors.
This is true if you do not differ between the party and the base, I rarely speak about party and party politics because that is how you say it is. The Left and Right though so exist as distinct populations—by careful media misrepresentation and careful division—which both love and hate their parasitical political parties which are each disgusted by their host population. The Democrat is of the inner party and the Republican is of the outer party, and the single Washington party is the puppet of international interests which are a small, rootless, cosmopolitan clique that has long been turning the people against each other, that does not want them to have peace. It is the bourgeois who are at home both nowhere and everywhere, who do not have anywhere a soil on which they have grown up, but who live in New York today, in Los Angeles tomorrow, Boca Raton the day after that, and then again in Tel Aviv or Shanghai or Singapore, and who feel at home everywhere. They are the only ones who can be addressed as international elements, because they conduct their business everywhere, but the people cannot follow them. The people are bounded to their soil, bounded to its homeland, bounded to the possibilities of life only that their state, their nation, offers.

One day the people might be united, but until then there is only avoiding the degenerate and their vampiric need to live off the less broken parts of society. Such are the times that the less broken parts are increasingly members of the former Democratic Party base who have become desperate to find a new spokesman. There is a danger and an opportunity within that but mostly there is a cold calculation of the international interests and their puppets that the Right and the Left can never win nor back the other into wanting Civil War more than good Compromise. There must be seen to be domestic balance politically in America even if the clique must lose by degree in America and rely on Europe and China for the maintenance of their World Order. So the Republicans are being allowed to win at CRT and absorb the angry former leftists even if that unbundles the careful balance of party values the Democrats and Republicans present as a sophie's choice every election. A careful bundling of party values between the Democrat and Republican will be reinstituted, and a new nationalism must confound that.

What we need is, basically, a working class party.
Yes, an isolationist party who punish overseas investment and importation of finished goods. China's capital controls are a good model, its legal system enforcing its economic doctrine is something America has not had for generations. The elites can be reformed from the base of society endlessly but losing the base population cannot be recovered from. A French Revolution where loyalty to a new order cannot be enforced individually, may need to happen to ensure a change in judicial and bureaucratic personnel. There cannot be a feeling of ample time, but one which is pitying to those who cannot see the big picture.

One where you sacrifice for your community so you can then walk with your head up high. That only acknowledges one nobility—that of hard work.

With this in mind, how can we best extract resources from say Mitch McConnell or Ted Cruz? How can we do it in a way that is totally legal? How can we do the same to the left?
We have to be a threat, someone who may punish them both in a way which actually hurts their career and someone who has the character to actually follow through on that if they get out of hand. Legally that is by making it clear what brings us to the polls and our numbers, at least for now. For the democrats nothing may be done, their parasitism has wholly broken the spirit of their electorate. <5% of Blacks vote against the party line, within Democratic caucus and in the general election. Unless the vote of the leftist host population is shaken, then their parasite lurches into their seats in Washington and continues to force America's decline.
 

MysticLord

Pyrotechnics Appreciator
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Nov 12, 2021
This is true if you do not differ between the party and the base, I rarely speak about party and party politics because that is how you say it is. The Left and Right though so exist as distinct populations—by careful media misrepresentation and careful division—which both love and hate their parasitical political parties which are each disgusted by their host population. The Democrat is of the inner party and the Republican is of the outer party, and the single Washington party is the puppet of international interests which are a small, rootless, cosmopolitan clique that has long been turning the people against each other, that does not want them to have peace. It is the bourgeois who are at home both nowhere and everywhere, who do not have anywhere a soil on which they have grown up, but who live in New York today, in Los Angeles tomorrow, Boca Raton the day after that, and then again in Tel Aviv or Shanghai or Singapore, and who feel at home everywhere. They are the only ones who can be addressed as international elements, because they conduct their business everywhere, but the people cannot follow them. The people are bounded to their soil, bounded to its homeland, bounded to the possibilities of life only that their state, their nation, offers.
I'm not sure I follow you RE "differ between party and base". My perspective is that the Republican party and the Republican base are diametrically opposed to one another, but the base has nowhere else to go.

I've heard the inner/outer party comparison, and it's a useful perspective. There's no reason to use just one perspective, they are just tools.

Before you go off on a jew-hate tangent, remember that Israel is inching towards vaccine mandates for all children. Whatever you think of elites from that ethnicity, their policies are universally bad for normal jews.

One day the people might be united, but until then there is only avoiding the degenerate and their vampiric need to live off the less broken parts of society. Such are the times that the less broken parts are increasingly members of the former Democratic Party base who have become desperate to find a new spokesman. There is a danger and an opportunity within that but mostly there is a cold calculation of the international interests and their puppets that the Right and the Left can never win nor back the other into wanting Civil War more than good Compromise. There must be seen to be domestic balance politically in America even if the clique must lose by degree in America and rely on Europe and China for the maintenance of their World Order. So the Republicans are being allowed to win at CRT and absorb the angry former leftists even if that unbundles the careful balance of party values the Democrats and Republicans present as a sophie's choice every election. A careful bundling of party values between the Democrat and Republican will be reinstituted, and a new nationalism must confound that.
This is strangely optimistic about our elite's competence and pessimistic about America's future. We are at USSR 1988 levels of distrust in our current crop of elites and their foot soldiers. The elite's plan - having lost a massive pile of legitimacy - is to keep escalating until we give in. However, they forget something; we are essential to the functioning of basic services and they are not.

If all of the HR and admin jobs - the email senders, the paperwork shufflers - were magically teleported to another habitable planet, we probably wouldn't notice it for a few days other than noting how calm the internet is.

However, if everyone who drives a truck was teleported, we would notice within 3 or 4 hours when gas stations run out of gas.

The elites can literally win every battle, drone strike entire stadiums of drumpftards, and the result would be that they can't feed themselves and that they are now at the mercy of an army of 50,000,000 illegal aliens. Central Americans are not known for their selflessness. The result would probably resemble those pre-Columbus Superbowl Sunday festivals where the Aztecs sacrificed 50,000 captives to the gods.
Yes, an isolationist party who punish overseas investment and importation of finished goods. China's capital controls are a good model, its legal system enforcing its economic doctrine is something America has not had for generations. The elites can be reformed from the base of society endlessly but losing the base population cannot be recovered from. A French Revolution where loyalty to a new order cannot be enforced individually, may need to happen to ensure a change in judicial and bureaucratic personnel. There cannot be a feeling of ample time, but one which is pitying to those who cannot see the big picture.
We should empower our existing proxies to defend our mutual interests overseas. Japan in Asia. Britain, France, Germany, Australia, New Zealand, and Canada deserve a harsher purge of their security forces and leadership classes than our own do.

The elites can't be reformed because it's not in their interests to be reformed. The simplest solution is to freeze their liquid assets, declare them persona non grata, issue warrants declaring that their property belongs to the first person to seize it, and deport them to Somalia or Venezuela or something.

The simplest and really only solution to governance is to devolve it to the smallest local polity. Let people - libtard or not - choose how they want to live, let them proper or suffer on their own merit. In the long run only the competent and loyal will survive.
We have to be a threat, someone who may punish them both in a way which actually hurts their career and someone who has the character to actually follow through on that if they get out of hand. Legally that is by making it clear what brings us to the polls and our numbers, at least for now. For the democrats nothing may be done, their parasitism has wholly broken the spirit of their electorate. <5% of Blacks vote against the party line, within Democratic caucus and in the general election. Unless the vote of the leftist host population is shaken, then their parasite lurches into their seats in Washington and continues to force America's decline.
I mean in more direct fashion: publishing tons of articles documenting Republican party elite betrayal and laying out the reasoning to ruin them, followed by shunning, encouragement of harmless pranks like refusing/delaying service or blowing snot rockets in their food whenever they eat out, refusing to prosecute crimes committed against them if you are a DA, refusing to arrest/investigate people who harm them if you are a sheriff, constantly ripping them off and wasting their time in business, giving them bad advice, lying to them. Everything short of direct violent confrontation, to make them unable to function in society.

As for Democrats, red counties seceding from blue states and cutting off resources to them should be more than sufficient to make them suffer.
 

mate

kiwifarms.net
Joined
Mar 1, 2018
Armchair psychoanalyzing your political opponents is the tool of the communist and the retard. Attack the arguments, not the person.

Unless they are a nigger, a shitskin or a kike, in which case you must call them a nigger, a shitskin or a kike.
 

Suomy Nona

kiwifarms.net
Joined
Nov 24, 2021
The right mindlessly support 'tough on crime' hyperbole without thinking about it.
The left mindlessly support 'understanding and forgiveness' hyperbole without thinking about it.
Most people, right or left, would be horrified to confront the reality of what they're supporting, but nobody wants to really smell the stink of the bureaucratic cruelty in the penal system or the suffering that victims of repeat habitual offenders go through.

There's no need for a big intellectual delve into the other side's small-minded stupidity, or ascribe deepseated biological imperatives to it, y'all are just doing it to spite the other side because people are small-minded and stupid in general, and boiling everything down to left vs right makes things simple and easy.
They're supposed to balance each other out. The Right has failed to hold it's ground and to hold the Left to account. Regardless, both parties have shut out the governing voices of the People-unless those voices agree with the state sponsored propaganda pushed by the media.
But if it were the Right in charge to the same degree as the Left is now, the OP would still be true, but rather than viewing the violent criminals as "victims of genetics" they would be viewed as "predetermined criminals", gving them reason to cordon them off from civilization.
Both Parties (with varied extent) are willing to do restrict freedoms over a virus and vaccination status, so why not then because of genetics? Better yet, instead of cordoning them off, why not just kill them?

Each hemisphere of your brain controls the opposite side of your body while serving different functions. If one side fails, you have a malfunctioning body. The Right part of the government is failing, therefore the Left is degrading and falling into a state of dysfunction and disrepair.

It would be nice if the Right reminded the Left that if they don't stop fawning over these violent criminals and don't stop being so lenient to the point of letting them run wild, it will result in a revolt against the government as a whole, not just one Party "at the ballot box".