Okay. Just to clarify, though, child support is an obligation to the child. Because things don't work perfectly, sometimes the custodial parent (often the mother) will be able to divert the money to herself rather than the child. This isn't what is supposed to happen, though.Pardon me, language barrier. In my country they are both under a word similar to alimony. I had no idea they were seperate in english.
oh it wasn't a hypothetical:So in the unlikely event that, for instance, a minor male was raped by an adult female, and a child was born, the child support obligation owed by that minor would be the result of a wrongful act by the adult.
I know the general situation has arisen, but not the specific situation where the victim sued and held the perpetrator liable for the full support amount successfully.oh it wasn't a hypothetical:
I'm fairly certain that "my body, my choice" is basically rhetoric.I think (in America) that leftie politics give some insight to this issue, and we should look at it in the context of race as well as gender.
For generations, people of color were stripped of their bodily autonomy. The debate is often framed in terms of control over one's body, and how women have (allegedly) been denied that in the past. To help compensate for historical wrongs, I think that regardless of any legal restrictions on abortion, it should always be 100% legal for women of color - and especially black women - to get abortions.
A woman's choice to commit murderI don't even understand why is this an issue. In my country it's a legal procedure up to 19 weeks (or 24 in cases of fetal abnormalities).
Religion should not be a burden to a woman's choice.
Also, it's free in a public hospital here, if you go to a private one it's not.
I don't want to have an abortion,ever. It's still a surgery. But, I won't support an abortion ban anytime soon.
Well in the US its legal up to 9 months in many states, an entire party is pretty much campaigning on up to 9 months, when its inarguably a baby. We have about as many late term, viable infant abortions as we do murders in the US. If they counted as infants, which they should because the only difference between them an a premie is location, our murder rate would be double. That right there is a reason why it should be a big deal.I don't even understand why is this an issue. In my country it's a legal procedure up to 19 weeks (or 24 in cases of fetal abnormalities).
Sure. But you dont need religion to think chopping up a tiny human being and laying their disected corpse out on a table should be illegal. All of us started at that state, and I think that the right to life should be given to all human beings regardless of age. Right to choose isnt a right either anymore than a woman choosing to drown her infant baby is her right. And even if you see it that way why does it have to be the womans choice? Why does a father get zero input?Religion should not be a burden to a woman's choice.
I think its hypocritical to be pro-abortion but cry about chicken eggs being eaten but not hypocritical to be pro-life and eat meat. Simply put a pig is not going to ever be able to talk to me, to have an argument with me, share interests or ideas. Babies will if allowed to live.Dumb question, but I did think of it somehow:
Is it hypocritical to be pro-life and eat meat?
Source?Well in the US its legal up to 9 months in many states
That's not how most abortions are performed, like, at all. You either take a couple of pills and it's like a really heavy period, or they put a little vacuum tube in you and suck it out.But you dont need religion to think chopping up a tiny human being and laying their disected corpse out on a table should be illegal