Adam Johnston / YourMovieSucks / YourMovieSucksDOTorg / AnUnkindness - It's hip to fuck dogs.

  • Sustained Denial of Service attacks by paid-for botnet. Service may be disrupted again in the near future.

    Search and email verification are restored.

Beanie

"I'm not your waifu. I'm no one's waifu."
kiwifarms.net
I'll give him that, his April Fools 2021 joke is one of the funniest videos I have ever seen. It's completely absurd, yet oddly relatable, as Tyrone/Adam makes fun of angry critic responses at people who don't "get" a film, cracking a smile at the same time. It's a banger.
 

Some Curious Person

kiwifarms.net
New race war
Adum complains about people misinterpreting him on reddit, specifically the sardonicast subreddit.

edit: added an mp4 of the video, in case the thought of giving a view to a canadian disgusts you so much that you wouldn't dare give him the attention

View attachment 2037409
This video is what caused me to look up YMS on kiwi in the first place. Honestly it's quite lolcowy of him to dissect random comments about his misrepresenting his review from plebbitors, which aren't exactly known for their high degree of being correct. It instinctively reminded me of his Cyberbully review (specifically him not being able to handle the internet).

However, reading the whole beastiality stuff, I can now sort of get why he'd get sick of people misrepresenting what says. It can be infuriating to be constantly mocked for having unpopular and conversational opinions, and even more so when people get a knee jerk reaction and label you without even looking into the details (which is why he was also so passionate about proving the world wrong on Kimba, while basically everyone else was content taking the """facts""" at face value).
I really respect that about him. People here say "It's such a weird hill to die on" and "Hmmm, suspicious", but are not considering that from his point of view, people are a hive mind. I get the impression that mob mentality, along with hypocrisy, are the things he detests the most.
The thing is, after reading the whole thread, many of his points do have merit, and the only one I've seen trying to actually discuss them is @Null

What I don't get is people using the "unnatural" and "repulsive" argument. Including Null's stance that
The general population is instinctively repulsed by animal sex for the same reason it's repulsed by pedophilia, incest, and cannibalism. There is a part of our brains, hard wired into us through
millennia of evolution, that instinctively knows that behavior has inherent negative consequences.
Well, the general population was repulsed by Homosexuality longer and more energetically than it was repulsed by incest throughout most of history (and still is in many parts of the world). On that note, I wonder if the slippery slope argument is for real. How come just a century ago people were jailed and looked down upon for sodomy, and now it is actively celebrated everywhere (in the western world, that is) and suddenly 1 in 10 people is gay / bi.
Further, why is that that Necrophilia hasn't joined the LGBT? I mean, it is a sexual preference, after all.
How come trannies who cut off their dick are "courageous" but cannibals who eat another deceased person with their consent go to jail?
Bottlenose dolphins are arguably more intelligent than apes (but lack opposable thumbs fully utilize tools like humans). They have a sense of self and even metacognition (recognizing one's own thoughts). There are also stories of them falling in love with their handler and committing suicide after they're gone, then there's also this story of a dude having a romantic relationship with a dolphin. Something's undoubtedly wrong about him, as he describes experiencing sexual abuse as a child, but then again, some homosexuals describe the same reason for that.
 

Null

Ooperator
kiwifarms.net
With peace and love Adam needs to really take a second to adjust his perspective. I'm 6 minutes into this and his frustration is in turn frustrating me.

First, he's absolutely correct that Sardonicast's user audience is going to be a convergence of three different audiences with wildly different perspectives and interests than his own audience. I've listened to Adam's reviews since as far back as I can remember. I never had any interest in movies until the Plinkett Star Wars reviews, and at the time YMS was trying to mimic that review style, so I ended up watching his very early YMS reviews as well and basically every video he's ever made since. I have a very strong understanding - developed over years - of what he likes in movies and what he doesn't like and how that coincides with my own interests.

His cohosts's audiences do not have that perspective, and chances are they find a lot of his criticisms pretentious and obnoxious. His style of delivery is very distinct and monotone which isn't something everyone appreciates (I like it). A caveat of Adam's criticisms, which is a flaw to general audiences, is that he watches a lot of film. He will watch every single movie premiered at every shithole film festival before doing a top list of films made during that year.

In doing so, he has a really strong understanding of film and it enables him to create extremely objective reviews told from the perspective of someone who knows a lot about movies. But, he has issues applying that to general audience sensibilities and I think even gauging the time appropriateness of those criticisms. I'm watching the entire Planet of the Apes trilogies in order. Adam did quick YMS reviews of all the new Planet of the Apes movies and his biggest criticism was that they're generic. This is true, and I can understand why someone who has seen a lot of movies would be completely bored watching that film. However, they're not really bad movies. Rise was the best, the 2nd one was forgettable but not offensive, and War kinda sucked. Similarly, he completely tore World War Z apart and when I watched it (after seeing his review and listening to it many many times while doing work) I didn't really recall it being as bad as he said, but I also don't really recall it at all.

To Adam, being forgettable and profitable is a great offense to him. He wants Oldboy and weird tranny films like I'm Thinking of Ending Things to be recognized for their thoughtfulness, but instead super generic factory form films like World War Z gross hundreds of millions of dollars and give incentive for Hollywood to keep making the exact same shit he's seen literally a thousand times.

To most people, these movies are going to be the first exposures to certain tropes and those people will be very effected by those tropes. If people like something they get defensive of them. Indiana Jones, if he's talking about the movie I think he is, is also quite old and people remember old memories more fondly.

There's also a big problem with this specific argument: The N word. Not that one - the other one. People more than during the fucking war are in absolute hysterics about Nazis. Asking people to expect anything other than two-dimensional personified evil is going to set a not-insignificant portion of that audience off. I happen to agree with Adam on this, which is why I consider Inglorious Basterds a horrifically bad film. Tarantino made Nazi torture porn, used it to find an Israeli wife while premiering it in Israel (literally), while the film itself makes zero effort to portray the allies or Jews as sympathetic. Instead, the film is a grotesque indulgence of psychotic bloodlust that only genuinely low-IQ westerners could ever appreciate.


WHICH BRINGS ME TO MY POINT.

If you're in a position like mine, or Adam's, the best skill you can develop is learning to figure out what criticism to listen to. It's not just taking criticism, it's sussing out what's real and what's just anger. You will receive a lot of input all the time, especially in different audiences. Not all of it is good advice. Some of it is. Some of it is bad advice but based on a genuine contention which can be addressed better with a different, creative solution. It is a real skill to figure out what advice is good advice.

There's going to be a lot of people who listen to Sardonicast who hate Adam because he's a furry and will give him shit over absolutely everything he says ever. A lot of people think he's a zoophile because of his weird libertarian perspective on dog blowjobs. A lot of people just hate his fucking voice and will always be very critical of him. I had a manager when I worked fast food named Marietta. Marietta hated me and always treated me poorly. I had no idea why, I was always nice to her, but she would go out of her way to be shitty to me. That's life, and as funny as it may seem, some people get their kicks stomping on a dream. Sometimes you just can't fucking win and it's just not fair.

The last thing he should want to do is start a blood feud with some community like a subreddit. That's what Boogie and DSP do. You can't beat it, you can't win, and your attention grows the hate mob. This results in your frustration being tied to your work, and eventually, that's the death of a creative love. This sort of video is the very first step towards a total downward spiral.

So with peace and love, peace and love, chill out my nigga.
 

CisnaHet Scumale

kiwifarms.net
With peace and love Adam needs to really take a second to adjust his perspective. I'm 6 minutes into this and his frustration is in turn frustrating me.

First, he's absolutely correct that Sardonicast's user audience is going to be a convergence of three different audiences with wildly different perspectives and interests than his own audience. I've listened to Adam's reviews since as far back as I can remember. I never had any interest in movies until the Plinkett Star Wars reviews, and at the time YMS was trying to mimic that review style, so I ended up watching his very early YMS reviews as well and basically every video he's ever made since. I have a very strong understanding - developed over years - of what he likes in movies and what he doesn't like and how that coincides with my own interests.

His cohosts's audiences do not have that perspective, and chances are they find a lot of his criticisms pretentious and obnoxious. His style of delivery is very distinct and monotone which isn't something everyone appreciates (I like it). A caveat of Adam's criticisms, which is a flaw to general audiences, is that he watches a lot of film. He will watch every single movie premiered at every shithole film festival before doing a top list of films made during that year.

In doing so, he has a really strong understanding of film and it enables him to create extremely objective reviews told from the perspective of someone who knows a lot about movies. But, he has issues applying that to general audience sensibilities and I think even gauging the time appropriateness of those criticisms. I'm watching the entire Planet of the Apes trilogies in order. Adam did quick YMS reviews of all the new Planet of the Apes movies and his biggest criticism was that they're generic. This is true, and I can understand why someone who has seen a lot of movies would be completely bored watching that film. However, they're not really bad movies. Rise was the best, the 2nd one was forgettable but not offensive, and War kinda sucked. Similarly, he completely tore World War Z apart and when I watched it (after seeing his review and listening to it many many times while doing work) I didn't really recall it being as bad as he said, but I also don't really recall it at all.

To Adam, being forgettable and profitable is a great offense to him. He wants Oldboy and weird tranny films like I'm Thinking of Ending Things to be recognized for their thoughtfulness, but instead super generic factory form films like World War Z gross hundreds of millions of dollars and give incentive for Hollywood to keep making the exact same shit he's seen literally a thousand times.

To most people, these movies are going to be the first exposures to certain tropes and those people will be very effected by those tropes. If people like something they get defensive of them. Indiana Jones, if he's talking about the movie I think he is, is also quite old and people remember old memories more fondly.

There's also a big problem with this specific argument: The N word. Not that one - the other one. People more than during the fucking war are in absolute hysterics about Nazis. Asking people to expect anything other than two-dimensional personified evil is going to set a not-insignificant portion of that audience off. I happen to agree with Adam on this, which is why I consider Inglorious Basterds a horrifically bad film. Tarantino made Nazi torture porn, used it to find an Israeli wife while premiering it in Israel (literally), while the film itself makes zero effort to portray the allies or Jews as sympathetic. Instead, the film is a grotesque indulgence of psychotic bloodlust that only genuinely low-IQ westerners could ever appreciate.


WHICH BRINGS ME TO MY POINT.

If you're in a position like mine, or Adam's, the best skill you can develop is learning to figure out what criticism to listen to. It's not just taking criticism, it's sussing out what's real and what's just anger. You will receive a lot of input all the time, especially in different audiences. Not all of it is good advice. Some of it is. Some of it is bad advice but based on a genuine contention which can be addressed better with a different, creative solution. It is a real skill to figure out what advice is good advice.

There's going to be a lot of people who listen to Sardonicast who hate Adam because he's a furry and will give him shit over absolutely everything he says ever. A lot of people think he's a zoophile because of his weird libertarian perspective on dog blowjobs. A lot of people just hate his fucking voice and will always be very critical of him. I had a manager when I worked fast food named Marietta. Marietta hated me and always treated me poorly. I had no idea why, I was always nice to her, but she would go out of her way to be shitty to me. That's life, and as funny as it may seem, some people get their kicks stomping on a dream. Sometimes you just can't fucking win and it's just not fair.

The last thing he should want to do is start a blood feud with some community like a subreddit. That's what Boogie and DSP do. You can't beat it, you can't win, and your attention grows the hate mob. This results in your frustration being tied to your work, and eventually, that's the death of a creative love. This sort of video is the very first step towards a total downward spiral.

So with peace and love, peace and love, chill out my nigga.
If there is one perspective Adam needs to adjust on, its that he needs to stop being such a repetitive and redundant sperg about certain topics. Just give a concise opinion and let it go.

How many dozens of hours does Adam need to give to Kimba the White Lion just to say that the Kimba v Lion King comparisons are exaggerated, misinformed and Kimba is a shitty franchise in terms of art? You could keep it within one tweet or within 10-15 minute YouTube presentation. The length of that Kimba video and his upcoming Lion King YMS just shows Adam should get retested for the Autism Spectrum because if what he's doing isn't obsessive sperging then I don't know what is.

Same goes for his reaction to criticism. Just say you disagree, make a respectful argument and move on if the opponent isn't going to see eye to eye.

Adam's livestreams are evident that if you like YMS, you should probably just stick to his main and gaming channels because you really don't want to know what goes on behind the scenes.
 

genericwhitemale

Based schizophrenic
kiwifarms.net
With peace and love Adam needs to really take a second to adjust his perspective. I'm 6 minutes into this and his frustration is in turn frustrating me.

First, he's absolutely correct that Sardonicast's user audience is going to be a convergence of three different audiences with wildly different perspectives and interests than his own audience. I've listened to Adam's reviews since as far back as I can remember. I never had any interest in movies until the Plinkett Star Wars reviews, and at the time YMS was trying to mimic that review style, so I ended up watching his very early YMS reviews as well and basically every video he's ever made since. I have a very strong understanding - developed over years - of what he likes in movies and what he doesn't like and how that coincides with my own interests.

His cohosts's audiences do not have that perspective, and chances are they find a lot of his criticisms pretentious and obnoxious. His style of delivery is very distinct and monotone which isn't something everyone appreciates (I like it). A caveat of Adam's criticisms, which is a flaw to general audiences, is that he watches a lot of film. He will watch every single movie premiered at every shithole film festival before doing a top list of films made during that year.

In doing so, he has a really strong understanding of film and it enables him to create extremely objective reviews told from the perspective of someone who knows a lot about movies. But, he has issues applying that to general audience sensibilities and I think even gauging the time appropriateness of those criticisms. I'm watching the entire Planet of the Apes trilogies in order. Adam did quick YMS reviews of all the new Planet of the Apes movies and his biggest criticism was that they're generic. This is true, and I can understand why someone who has seen a lot of movies would be completely bored watching that film. However, they're not really bad movies. Rise was the best, the 2nd one was forgettable but not offensive, and War kinda sucked. Similarly, he completely tore World War Z apart and when I watched it (after seeing his review and listening to it many many times while doing work) I didn't really recall it being as bad as he said, but I also don't really recall it at all.

To Adam, being forgettable and profitable is a great offense to him. He wants Oldboy and weird tranny films like I'm Thinking of Ending Things to be recognized for their thoughtfulness, but instead super generic factory form films like World War Z gross hundreds of millions of dollars and give incentive for Hollywood to keep making the exact same shit he's seen literally a thousand times.

To most people, these movies are going to be the first exposures to certain tropes and those people will be very effected by those tropes. If people like something they get defensive of them. Indiana Jones, if he's talking about the movie I think he is, is also quite old and people remember old memories more fondly.
I became disillusioned by YMS because of his beastiality comments and what he did to Mark English, but I'll always respect him as a critic because he seems to understands that curation is the most important aspect of criticism. As someone who's interested in the field of criticism, I feel it's far more rewarding to turn people on to a movie they wouldn't otherwise see than turn them off a movie they would, and probably will see. 99% of the people who go see capeshit will probably enjoy it and not be bothered by it and their opinions aren't going to change because of how you feel. But if you can turn even just one person on to something they otherwise would ignore, you've done something infinitely more rewarding.
Some of his criticisms do feel like he's trying too hard to be contrarian, like when he said (I'm paraphrasing, so maybe someone can correct me) there weren't any great, noteworthy films until Citizen Kane and when he thought Eraserhead was pretentious.
 

Null

Ooperator
kiwifarms.net
How many dozens of hours does Adam need to give to Kimba the White Lion just to say that the Kimba v Lion King comparisons are exaggerated, misinformed and Kimba is a shitty franchise in terms of art? You could keep it within one tweet or within 10-15 minute YouTube presentation. The length of that Kimba video and his upcoming Lion King YMS just shows Adam should get retested for the Autism Spectrum because if what he's doing isn't obsessive sperging then I don't know what is.
I wouldn't say this isn't necessarily true. Making an interesting review in and of itself a worthwhile goal. I watch a ton of reviews of shit I've never seen or played and never will. That's why RLM's Star Wars reviews were such a huge fucking deal. It essentially reinvented the idea of a movie review. To completely and totally shred something and then reassemble it with original content to make something very different, and perhaps even better.

Reviews went from a catalog complement for people looking to consume something else, to a stand-alone media.

Adam's reviews are very different from RLM's and that's a good thing. I've seen Ralph the Movie Maker's and I Hate Everything's reviews and I really don't like them. IHE in particular is a smug British cunt who just goes "wow this CGI movie made for $300 for the sole purpose of ripping off confused elderly people is actually not that great" over and over and over and over and over again. It's totally joyless hate fodder for fucking imbeciles who need to be told what to think.

But if you can turn even just one person on to something they otherwise would ignore, you've done something infinitely more rewarding.
That's why I think Oldboy is such a great review of his. I actually did watch the original, probably the first foreign film I ever watched, because I really trusted his opinion. I've also seen a lot of weird shit I'd never had heard of specifically because he rated it highly. I went out of my way to get comfy and dedicate a few hours to watching I'm Thinking of Ending Things. While I don't really consider it as memorable or great as Oldboy, I didn't dislike it, and the topic it approaches (men reflecting on a life of loneliness and dwelling in their daydreams about women they've only had passing words with) is extremely interesting.

I'm never going to watch Synecdoche New York though.
 

Nauseated Courgi

Spontaneously Alive and Well
kiwifarms.net
Well, the general population was repulsed by Homosexuality longer and more energetically than it was repulsed by incest throughout most of history (and still is in many parts of the world).
I contribute that to the fact that most religions frown upon Homosexuality and, given how big of an influence religion did and still does have, it becomes pretty obvious as to why that is. That's not even mentioning the degeneracy some Homosexuals participate in that would disgust most (granted there is degeneracy on the straight side of things, but that's beside the point).

As for incest, don't quote me on this, but I think it wasn't as actively hated because it wasn't nearly as prevalent as Homosexuality and was already naturally discouraged by most.

On that note, I wonder if the slippery slope argument is for real.
It is, you actually give a good example of why it exist.

How come just a century ago people were jailed and looked down upon for sodomy, and now it is actively celebrated everywhere (in the western world, that is) and suddenly 1 in 10 people is gay / bi.
Because, over time, people have been getting less strict when it comes to the standards of sex and relationships. It has it positives, but there are obvious negatives.

Further, why is that that Necrophilia hasn't joined the LGBT? I mean, it is a sexual preference, after all.
How come trannies who cut off their dick are "courageous" but cannibals who eat another deceased person with their consent go to jail?
Here's that slippery slope I was talking about. Letting the Transgenders join them was already treading a delicate tight rope, going even further and letting something like Necrophilia join in does nothing put the LGBT crowd in hotter water than they're already in thanks to the current group's degenerates.

Cannibalism has arguably been more frowned upon than Homosexuality given that it goes beyond has sex with the someone same sex into territory that most consider to be morally reprehensible.
 

Polexia Aphrodisia

Life just kills me. Do you have any pot?
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
If he was doing any mainstream/Disney movie other than Lion King for his obscenely long review, I'd be anticipating it. I like longform content from creators I enjoy because I usually watch those videos in the background of doing something else. But it will never not piss me off that he's so obsessed with that movie because he desperately wants to fuck one of the characters, and isn't clear enough about that fact.

People would laugh at him if he was a straight man who was obsessed with, let's say, Pirates of the Caribbean, because he'd sell his soul to have Keira Knightley slob his knob. But I guess he gets a pass for being furry and gay?
 

carltondanks

kiwifarms.net
With peace and love Adam needs to really take a second to adjust his perspective. I'm 6 minutes into this and his frustration is in turn frustrating me.

First, he's absolutely correct that Sardonicast's user audience is going to be a convergence of three different audiences with wildly different perspectives and interests than his own audience. I've listened to Adam's reviews since as far back as I can remember. I never had any interest in movies until the Plinkett Star Wars reviews, and at the time YMS was trying to mimic that review style, so I ended up watching his very early YMS reviews as well and basically every video he's ever made since. I have a very strong understanding - developed over years - of what he likes in movies and what he doesn't like and how that coincides with my own interests.

His cohosts's audiences do not have that perspective, and chances are they find a lot of his criticisms pretentious and obnoxious. His style of delivery is very distinct and monotone which isn't something everyone appreciates (I like it). A caveat of Adam's criticisms, which is a flaw to general audiences, is that he watches a lot of film. He will watch every single movie premiered at every shithole film festival before doing a top list of films made during that year.

In doing so, he has a really strong understanding of film and it enables him to create extremely objective reviews told from the perspective of someone who knows a lot about movies. But, he has issues applying that to general audience sensibilities and I think even gauging the time appropriateness of those criticisms. I'm watching the entire Planet of the Apes trilogies in order. Adam did quick YMS reviews of all the new Planet of the Apes movies and his biggest criticism was that they're generic. This is true, and I can understand why someone who has seen a lot of movies would be completely bored watching that film. However, they're not really bad movies. Rise was the best, the 2nd one was forgettable but not offensive, and War kinda sucked. Similarly, he completely tore World War Z apart and when I watched it (after seeing his review and listening to it many many times while doing work) I didn't really recall it being as bad as he said, but I also don't really recall it at all.

To Adam, being forgettable and profitable is a great offense to him. He wants Oldboy and weird tranny films like I'm Thinking of Ending Things to be recognized for their thoughtfulness, but instead super generic factory form films like World War Z gross hundreds of millions of dollars and give incentive for Hollywood to keep making the exact same shit he's seen literally a thousand times.

To most people, these movies are going to be the first exposures to certain tropes and those people will be very effected by those tropes. If people like something they get defensive of them. Indiana Jones, if he's talking about the movie I think he is, is also quite old and people remember old memories more fondly.

There's also a big problem with this specific argument: The N word. Not that one - the other one. People more than during the fucking war are in absolute hysterics about Nazis. Asking people to expect anything other than two-dimensional personified evil is going to set a not-insignificant portion of that audience off. I happen to agree with Adam on this, which is why I consider Inglorious Basterds a horrifically bad film. Tarantino made Nazi torture porn, used it to find an Israeli wife while premiering it in Israel (literally), while the film itself makes zero effort to portray the allies or Jews as sympathetic. Instead, the film is a grotesque indulgence of psychotic bloodlust that only genuinely low-IQ westerners could ever appreciate.


WHICH BRINGS ME TO MY POINT.

If you're in a position like mine, or Adam's, the best skill you can develop is learning to figure out what criticism to listen to. It's not just taking criticism, it's sussing out what's real and what's just anger. You will receive a lot of input all the time, especially in different audiences. Not all of it is good advice. Some of it is. Some of it is bad advice but based on a genuine contention which can be addressed better with a different, creative solution. It is a real skill to figure out what advice is good advice.

There's going to be a lot of people who listen to Sardonicast who hate Adam because he's a furry and will give him shit over absolutely everything he says ever. A lot of people think he's a zoophile because of his weird libertarian perspective on dog blowjobs. A lot of people just hate his fucking voice and will always be very critical of him. I had a manager when I worked fast food named Marietta. Marietta hated me and always treated me poorly. I had no idea why, I was always nice to her, but she would go out of her way to be shitty to me. That's life, and as funny as it may seem, some people get their kicks stomping on a dream. Sometimes you just can't fucking win and it's just not fair.

The last thing he should want to do is start a blood feud with some community like a subreddit. That's what Boogie and DSP do. You can't beat it, you can't win, and your attention grows the hate mob. This results in your frustration being tied to your work, and eventually, that's the death of a creative love. This sort of video is the very first step towards a total downward spiral.

So with peace and love, peace and love, chill out my nigga.
the more and more i read this, the more and more i think of STAR_/ster and his latest video on his youtube channel and how he's been dealing with critics in general. aka "wah, this audience doesn't like me, but this other audience that we've moderated to fuck does"
 

Gay Mouth

Chantal’s neck, Bibi’s conscience
kiwifarms.net
The animal fucking I do not understand at all. He advocates this? Or is it something like "technically humans r animals lawl" shit.

I imagine he's a furry?
It’s a thousand times more autistic and he just can’t stop doubling down. His take is that “if you’re against humans fucking animals, you must be vegetarian, because they’re at least morally equal, but you could argue killing and eating them is worse than fucking them because fucking them makes them feel good and killing and eating them makes them feel bad.”

He’s so convinced of his logic here that he’s starting to port his “u must b vegan to have this opinion” arguement over to any discussion on environmentalism or ethics.
 

Scarlett Johansson

Hello, I'm Shelley Duvall
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
It’s a thousand times more autistic and he just can’t stop doubling down. His take is that “if you’re against humans fucking animals, you must be vegetarian, because they’re at least morally equal, but you could argue killing and eating them is worse than fucking them because fucking them makes them feel good and killing and eating them makes them feel bad.”

He’s so convinced of his logic here that he’s starting to port his “u must b vegan to have this opinion” arguement over to any discussion on environmentalism or ethics.
I.......if it's possible to have a brain aneurysm and vomit at the same time....

He's already a degenerate for being gay (aren't most of the cast gay except like...one?) but holy shit go be a damn furry. Don't advocate this illegal wretched shit.

I imagine he was forced, Clockwork style, to watch Jungle Book and other anthropomorphic animal films.

He should look up Mr Hands and take that case to heart. An animal could easily rip his face off if he tries to fuck it.
 

PeriodicTrouble

kiwifarms.net
1617705238500.png
Well, looks like the Lion King YMS is getting delayed.
https://www.reddit.com/r/YMS/comments/ml3yrm/get_well_adum_were_here_for_you/
 

Gay Mouth

Chantal’s neck, Bibi’s conscience
kiwifarms.net
Lion King premiered in July 2019. He’s been working on this review almost as long as the film was in production. At this point, it’s so late I don’t even care about it. If his Kimba review was any indicator, I’m sure he’ll leave no stone unturned, but that was really to the Kimba reviews’ detriment in some places. You don’t need to meticulously shred apart every frame of The Lion King 2019 to show it’s an OBVIOUS cash grab and wasn’t as good as the original. The arguement that a piece of art was already good and a remake isn’t necessary is pointless. It’s Disney, and money is the only motivation needed.

It’s pretty clear to me his sense of humor is completely dead by now. He’s over-committed himself to about a year backload of videos that are rushed, passionless and lazy. He won’t take it well when the internet doesn’t understand his genius and his three hour review doesn’t land. Seems like he’s become more snippy, petulant and odd with time.

He doesn’t seem happy. He should just get a job out in meatspace. Being a terminally alone shut in furry isn’t good for your mental health.
 

Similar threads

B
Popular furry artist with a penchant for being rapey & an ego that could black out the sun
Replies
645
Views
275K
Powertripping Discord staff member with a dash of cub-defending and furfaggotry, AKA the "cub porn Discord mod"
Replies
631
Views
162K
Unapologetic hack producing nonstop clickbait, exploits dead people for views
Replies
509
Views
127K
Top