So...allowing people to do something is the authoritarian thing, and allowing individual states to restrict the freedom of their citizens is the freedom-loving thing? I must be missing something hereWhy shouldn't it?
The restrictions imposed upon individual states by Roe v. Wade wasn't decided by Congress, and signed into law by the President.
It was a donkey case, brought before partisan liberal Supreme Court judges. Much as this one is; the exception this time being the lack of a bench stacked with statists.
And beyond that, and the current shitfight everyone's watching, judicial term limits are definitely part of this war.