All news is fake news - Is confirmation bias real?

  • Intermittent Denial of Service attack is causing downtime. Looks like a kiddie 5 min rental. Looking into some solutions.
W

WW 635

Guest
kiwifarms.net
We constantly hear that things are fake news, but sometimes that "fake news" is just a poorly framed story based on real events. How do you determine what is fake news? Does confirmation bias play a role?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
W

WW 635

Guest
kiwifarms.net
its just news that's not real lol

What about this tho?

 

CamelCursive

kiwifarms.net
TBH, I'd say there's a lot to it. It's all about the language they use. I could post at length about it, but I don't feel like it at the moment. May revisit.

Also, a lot of times a journalist is just fucking stupid and doesn't know how to read data.
 

mr.moon1488

True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
What about this tho?

That's not really outright fake, but it's clearly misleading. Someone reading that headline from a blank perspective would think "omg, he's paling around, and agreeing with horrible dictators," when in actuality, his comments were made partially in jest, and in response to a leading question "Do you believe that they violated U.N. resolutions with the short-range missiles launch (if the media was even remotely ethical, this would be the end of the question), and does it give you pause at all to be appearing to side with a brutal dictator instead of with a fellow American, the former vice president, Joe Biden?"
 
W

WW 635

Guest
kiwifarms.net
What about this one where the title and evidence are clearly misleading in favour of the defendant:


Same article with different headline:


Article with missing discussion of evidence relevant to the conviction:


Is the first or second one fake news, just misleading, or is it legit journalism?
 

Sperglord Dante

Useless Guato
kiwifarms.net
What about this one where the title and evidence are clearly misleading in favour of the defendant:


Same article with different headline:


Article with missing discussion of evidence relevant to the conviction:


Is the first or second one fake news, just misleading, or is it legit journalism?
The first one has a much more obvious spin, and the second is more of a summary of the trial itself and sounds more matter of fact, but I wouldn't call the first one fake news. The bit about the security tapes got me curious for more details, and the second source happened to have an article on the defendant's account too (which imo they should've quoted in their most recent story) :


If anything this is proof that you should always be willing to hear both sides before reaching a conclusion.
 

WhoBusTank69

an endless thirst
kiwifarms.net
There is a difference between something being entirely fake and lying by omission/obfuscating the facts.
Aside from outright lying; opinion pieces, baseless accusations, and fabricated quotes are what should be described as fake news, as it is either not news in even the loosest sense or is falsely reported as news.

Misleading headlines, while scummy, are an invention of desperate journalists and bloggers to get attention.
 

CamelCursive

kiwifarms.net
"WAAA WAAA I HAVE TO BE INFORMED ENOUGH TO INTERPRET EVENTS WITHOUT RELYING ON A GATEKEEPER WAA WAA."

^Everyone who ever complained about fake news.
Or, you know, we're a bit more concerned about the misinformed mobs of idiots out there that can be objectively dangerous.

It's not always about yourself, way to misrepresent the argument.
 

Exorbital Columnations

A dog's rights activist, a lover, a friend.
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Or, you know, we're a bit more concerned about the misinformed mobs of idiots out there that can be objectively dangerous.

It's not always about yourself, way to misrepresent the argument.
So.. We're going to solve the "people are stupider than me" problem once and for all? I'm impressed but a tad skeptical.

I'd say worrying about yourself is more efficient and rational.
 

CamelCursive

kiwifarms.net
So.. We're going to solve the "people are stupider than me" problem once and for all? I'm impressed but a tad skeptical.

I'd say worrying about yourself is more efficient and rational.
While that sounds good, it's not "me" I'm concerned about. I'm concerned about gullible idiots. All it takes is the right kind of spin and we've got a riot on our hands. If you don't think this is a legitimate concern, you're not paying attention.
 
Top