Allison Cooke / hanleia / finnrey / gogoeeg / enta_jinnai / eijiIynx / ashlives2020 - Severely Bipolar and Autistic LGBTQP+ Self-Hating-Jew Fujoshi Cat Lady

Iron Hamster

Days DSP has waited for Twitch apology: 37
kiwifarms.net
LMAO At this point I hope Allison gets her ass sued into oblivion after triggering all this shitstorm. And the fact Rial dated this guy only makes things more amusing. I seriously can't believe it

Still trying to figure out why manatee rial wouldn't correct her other than pure malice.


Allison probably won't get sued because a) she's got nothing and b) she's been too scared to do much of anything.

Her good buddy Kaylyn, however, is probably fucked for sure now. She's the one who really went hard into pushing Allison's post and she knew the story Allison linked had nothing to do with Vic.

She should have been included in this first round to begin with. She's the one who stated she didn't know how to make a hashtag then made the KV hastag in the same post. Plus they all propagated the fake swatting story, the fake molestation pic at a con that the girl in the pic told them to remove and FOAD.... so #bargegurl #kickkayl (tee hee hee.....am I doing it right?) *vomit*
 

In Heaven

In Heaven, everything is fine...
kiwifarms.net
On the one hand, I'm horrified that people tried to sink Vic's career by falsely accusing him of SOMEONE ELSE'S crime. Amazingly, it makes Marchi and Rial look even MORE repulsive because they were either too stupid to do their research, or were fully aware they were spouting complete bullshit (I mean, they always WERE spouting bullshit, but this makes them appear even more opportunistic and selfish).

On the other hand... God DAMN, this is too funny. Can we resurrect Hitchcock to make a movie about this? This plot twist is right up his alley.
 

Far Queue

kiwifarms.net
Jesus fucking christ. If only I knew how right I was.

The accusations weren't even about fucking Vic. How can you possibly fuck this up. How?

When you have a mantra of "listen and believe" instead of something like "trust but verify" is it at all surprising? You aren't meant to even ask the most basic kinds of questions. Fuck ups are inevitable.
 

BHWuser

kiwifarms.net
I went through Rial/Toye's TCPA again.

View attachment 890780

Page 286.

You know what they say about leaven.

ADD: So, since the informant for Cooke was unstable in addition to literally having brain damage to the point that they'd be committing perjury on line 1 of an affidavit, do you think BHBH will have to contact PULL admins to authenticate those posts (and mind you, PULL, those posts are archived)?

Do you think they'll comply, or no? And if they don't, do you think they'll have to subpoena?
Well we'd have to know the person and they'd have to show they actually have brain damage. Because it could just be an excuse to try to cover up the fact they're bullshitting. Sort of a "this is my out to cover my ass if questioned". Which leaves us with one of two possibilities anyways. Either they're a liar to begin with, or they are brain damaged and completely unreliable. Either way, nothing they say is able to be trusted and thus completely irrelevant. Even if it did happen, this person is ruined as a witness.
 

mindlessobserver

True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
This is it kiwis. We have found the bottom of the stupid. Like zen explorers we have journeyed deep into the bowels of this steaming pile of shit, only to return at last to the source. To the place where it all began. Where we learn the very first accusation was made by a brain damaged woman on PULL who confused Vic with Monica's pedo ex boyfriend and thus convinced a gullible idiot named Allison Cooke to tweet about Vic and getting Armzgurl to launch a #movement. The stupid is connected, the circle is complete.

They were literally brain damaged.
 

Zero Day Defense

"Now come, Samurai. Put on a good show."
kiwifarms.net
This is it kiwis. We have found the bottom of the stupid. Like zen explorers we have journeyed deep into the bowels of this steaming pile of shit, only to return at last to the source. To the place where it all began. Where we learn the very first accusation was made by a brain damaged woman on PULL who confused Vic with Monica's pedo ex boyfriend and thus convinced a gullible idiot named Allison Cooke to tweet about Vic and getting Armzgurl to launch a #movement. The stupid is connected, the circle is complete.

They were literally brain damaged.

Ah! But you forget about the time that Vic touched Jamie's hair!

And the time that Vic asked two people if they wanted to have sex together, and then after they said no, he let them go!

And all those times he had sex with people who weren't his fiancée!

And we can't forget the time that he ate Monica's jellybean!

i'm aware there are other allegations but i'm omitting them because they suck even harder and they ruin the flow of the joke here being that i'm listing things that people keep touting that are not at all actionable
 
So let me get this straight. The original tweet by hanleia, that allegedly sparked Funimation investigating Vic, was immediately followed by her presenting her "evidence" which consisted of a PULL post by someone with a traumatic brain injury who was clearly confusing Vic with Illich Guardiola?

Well, I suppose that explains why hanleia's allegation wasn't part of the investigation of Vic, and why Funimation has avoiding explaining when and why her tweet's claim was dismissed without them ever bothering to ask Vic about it. They knew immediately that the allegation was bullshit from someone whose brain wasn't functioning correctly and no further investigation should have been warranted. So they really don't want to explain why word that they were investigating Vic traveled far enough to get to Monica and prompt her to tell her stories, or admit that the real cause of the investigation was Monica coming forward with her and the twins allegations.
 

RodgerDodger

True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
On the one hand, I'm horrified that people tried to sink Vic's career by falsely accusing him of SOMEONE ELSE'S crime. Amazingly, it makes Marchi and Rial look even MORE repulsive because they were either too stupid to do their research, or were fully aware they were spouting complete bullshit (I mean, they always WERE spouting bullshit, but this makes them appear even more opportunistic and selfish).

On the other hand... God DAMN, this is too funny. Can we resurrect Hitchcock to make a movie about this? This plot twist is right up his alley.

The actual guy, the actual creeper pedo perv, was Monica’s ex. There is no fucking way she didn’t know. Especially after he was arrested for running off to do a Vegas wedding with a minor to avoid arrest. It begs the question, how many other tales of her ex did Monica publicly attach to Vic?
 

Zero Day Defense

"Now come, Samurai. Put on a good show."
kiwifarms.net
The actual guy, the actual creeper pedo perv, was Monica’s ex. There is no fucking way she didn’t know. Especially after he was arrested for running off to do a Vegas wedding with a minor to avoid arrest. It begs the question, how many other tales of her ex did Monica publicly attach to Vic?

Perhaps she cut-and-pasted an altercation she had with Guardiola into Izumicon and replaced him with Vic.

That was the first thing that came to mind when this news broke.

That said, I'm still having issues figuring out why Rial couldn't have just outright said that Vic raped her, or tried to rape her. It makes no sense. If she's going to fabricate an entire incident that nobody that she's named will attest to in any way, why not go all the way with something that can only be treated as a he said, she said? She tries to malign the incident as sexual assault, but the reality is that she, by her own admission, made absolutely no signal to Vic that what he was doing was unwanted. She says that she "went along with it"-- a judge won't look at that as sexual assault. A jury won't look at that as sexual assault, because it literally isn't sexual assault. It's not even borderline-- she says that she participated in the act without even trying to say "no".

That's why I'm not entirely sold on my conjecture that her Izumicon incident being a xerox of an incident she had with Guardiola. Because, given the fact that this incident wouldn't even be able to be verified or debunked without her idiotically naming a fact witness that she would then proceed to not contact, it would have been better for her to just make an unverifiable lie that would get slack because of the difficulty in proving private two-party crimes like sexual assault.
 

Phony Negro

DAMN
kiwifarms.net
Perhaps she cut-and-pasted an altercation she had with Guardiola into Izumicon and replaced him with Vic.

That was the first thing that came to mind when this news broke.

Certainly possible, maybe not likely. Guardiola was at Izumicon in 2008. I have no idea if he was at it in 2007.


Now that I mentioned it, Monica Rial was also at Izumicon 2008. Don't know why Guardiola isn't named, though.


Screenshot.png


That said, I'm still having issues figuring out why Rial couldn't have just outright said that Vic raped her, or tried to rape her. It makes no sense. If she's going to fabricate an entire incident that nobody that she's named will attest to in any way, why not go all the way with something that can only be treated as a he said, she said? She tries to malign the incident as sexual assault, but the reality is that she, by her own admission, made absolutely no signal to Vic that what he was doing was unwanted. She says that she "went along with it"-- a judge won't look at that as sexual assault. A jury won't look at that as sexual assault, because it literally isn't sexual assault. It's not even borderline-- she says that she participated in the act without even trying to say "no".

That's the interesting thing about this. Imagine what would have happened if this lawsuit never happened. Rial would have never said there was an attempted rape to anyone publicly. But why wouldn't she? And why didn't she?

And she did edit her story a couple of times:
  • On February 19, 2019, she not once mentioned the attempted rape in her Twitter post.
  • On June 30, when her response to Vic's lawsuit appeared, it mentioned the attempted rape. If Nick didn't catch wind of this situation, would it have ever been released that this happened? There was also a contradiction where it was claimed that Rial tried to resist Vic's aggressiveness, despite her saying in her February 19 message that she froze when Vic became aggressive.
  • Then, in her deposition, Rial said the "went along with it", contradicting what she said in her June 30 filing.
It's all just so bad and so stupid. How could Vic prove anything wrong if this dumb bitch keeps changing/adding details to her story?

That's why I'm not entirely sold on my conjecture that her Izumicon incident being a xerox of an incident she had with Guardiola. Because, given the fact that this incident wouldn't even be able to be verified or debunked without her idiotically naming a fact witness that she would then proceed to not contact, it would have been better for her to just make an unverifiable lie that would get slack because of the difficulty in proving private two-party crimes like sexual assault.

I feel pretty bad for Stan Dahlin. He got thrown under the bus by Rial because when he was name-dropped in her documents, and to harpies, it had looked like he didn't care about people's concerns and grievances, despite Dahlin giving both Vic and Rial financial opportunities at his conventions. Now, these same harpies are saying that they don't want to go to Stan's conventions, despite him not being a part of the convention scene for about four years now.
 
Last edited:

Zero Day Defense

"Now come, Samurai. Put on a good show."
kiwifarms.net
And she did edit her story a couple of times:
  • On February 19, 2019, she not once mentioned the attempted rape in her Twitter post.
  • On June 30, when her response to Vic's lawsuit appeared, it mentioned the attempted rape. If Nick didn't catch wind of this situation, would it have ever been released that this happened? There was also a contradiction where it was claimed that Rial tried to resist Vic's aggressiveness, despite her saying in her February 19 message that she froze when Vic became aggressive.
  • Then, in her deposition, Rial said the "went along with it", contradicting what she said in her June 30 filing.

I don't recall the discrepancy being with the mention of what she's been trying to frame as attempted rape, but rather what she did in the alleged incident. In her February 19th post, she says that she froze up because she was raped as a teenager and figured that she'd make the situation worse for herself if she fought back.
 

Phony Negro

DAMN
kiwifarms.net
I don't recall the discrepancy being with the mention of what she's been trying to frame as attempted rape, but rather what she did in the alleged incident. In her February 19th post, she says that she froze up because she was raped as a teenager and figured that she'd make the situation worse for herself if she fought back.

That's what I meant/said. I just put emphasis on her not mentioning an attempted rape previously.
 

Francis York Morgan

FBI Special Agent
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
That said, I'm still having issues figuring out why Rial couldn't have just outright said that Vic raped her, or tried to rape her. It makes no sense. If she's going to fabricate an entire incident that nobody that she's named will attest to in any way, why not go all the way with something that can only be treated as a he said, she said? She tries to malign the incident as sexual assault, but the reality is that she, by her own admission, made absolutely no signal to Vic that what he was doing was unwanted. She says that she "went along with it"-- a judge won't look at that as sexual assault. A jury won't look at that as sexual assault, because it literally isn't sexual assault. It's not even borderline-- she says that she participated in the act without even trying to say "no".
I think the word choice has been very deliberate with Monica's accusations. Rape is a serious criminal accusation, one without much room for interpretation and has a very well tested process in our criminal justice system. If she came forward claiming that Vic raped her, people (including any real HR personnel) would ask for a police report or some kind of real, physical evidence. Also, Vic would immediately fight such an accusation which is exactly what she didn't want or expect.

Sexual assault has more ambiguity to it and, if she had remained vague enough with the accusation, might have Vic think maybe what he thought of as a friendly gesture was not received that way by Monica for whatever reason. Unfortunately for her, she couldn't keep her mouth shut and Vic fought back.

What's now a bigger mystery to me is why they chose Allison's tweet to virtue signal. Especially when the main parties who pushed this (Marzgurl) knew the accused in her tweets wasn't Vic. Surely there was some other crazy fujo out there tweeting about what an awful guy Vic was because he didn't want to endorse their creepy porn. As we've seen with this saga, there's no shortage of insane, sex-starved fujos out there who dislike Vic.
 

Zero Day Defense

"Now come, Samurai. Put on a good show."
kiwifarms.net
I think the word choice has been very deliberate with Monica's accusations. Rape is a serious criminal accusation, one without much room for interpretation and has a very well tested process in our criminal justice system. If she came forward claiming that Vic raped her, people (including any real HR personnel) would ask for a police report or some kind of real, physical evidence. Also, Vic would immediately fight such an accusation which is exactly what she didn't want or expect.

I think you might be right-- everything her and Marchi have been accusing Vic of has conveniently been outside of the statute of limitations or hardly actionable. Initially, when pressed on it, she said that it was "inappropriate", as if being "inappropriate" is somehow equivalent to assault or rape. But forgetting that in jurisdictions like Texas, sexual assault is rape, she was evidently pandering to a kind of people who wouldn't care about police reports or anything of the sort in the first place. People that would shame even consensual actions (think Louis C.K. masturbating in front of people he didn't work with after asking them if he could and after they agreed).

The other thing is that Monica came out with her story in February, and Vic was terminated around the end of January. If Funimation thought it reasonable to fire a person for either innocuous or otherwise unactionable interactions-- some of which didn't involve other Funimation workers, and all of which were off Funimation property-- I'd be inclined to think that they had it out for him or were otherwise strongarmed enough that it wouldn't have mattered to HR at that point if Monica just flat out said that he raped her. Not to mention, Funimation doesn't have the HR department that was necessary to do the investigation that Mika acted on. They effectively had to contract an HR from Sony, meaning that without it being brought up to her, Denbow wouldn't have known that Rial was saying that Vic raped her and wouldn't have bothered to ring her up since that wasn't something that she mentioned to her. I mean, even now, that hasn't happened.
 

Similar threads

Costhot, conslut and one of Vic Mignogna's more well known supporters
Replies
123
Views
27K
"Unbiased" Reporting on All Things Anime Related By Snobbish Quebec-Based Web Company
Replies
2K
Views
188K
Top