Fucking bravo, Allison. Hope you had fun while it lasted.
Cooke has been having the opposite of fun, constantly having to duck the realization that her actions and words don't exist in a vacuum.
Fucking bravo, Allison. Hope you had fun while it lasted.
She literally has brain damage.There's only two fucking cities, Pheonix (including it's suburb of Scottdale, and Mesa) and Tucson, with the only other place of value being Flagstaff how the fuck can't she remember?
LMAO At this point I hope Allison gets her ass sued into oblivion after triggering all this shitstorm. And the fact Rial dated this guy only makes things more amusing. I seriously can't believe it
Allison probably won't get sued because a) she's got nothing and b) she's been too scared to do much of anything.
Her good buddy Kaylyn, however, is probably fucked for sure now. She's the one who really went hard into pushing Allison's post and she knew the story Allison linked had nothing to do with Vic.
Jesus fucking christ. If only I knew how right I was.
The accusations weren't even about fucking Vic. How can you possibly fuck this up. How?
Well we'd have to know the person and they'd have to show they actually have brain damage. Because it could just be an excuse to try to cover up the fact they're bullshitting. Sort of a "this is my out to cover my ass if questioned". Which leaves us with one of two possibilities anyways. Either they're a liar to begin with, or they are brain damaged and completely unreliable. Either way, nothing they say is able to be trusted and thus completely irrelevant. Even if it did happen, this person is ruined as a witness.I went through Rial/Toye's TCPA again.
View attachment 890780
Page 286.
You know what they say about leaven.
ADD: So, since the informant for Cooke was unstable in addition to literally having brain damage to the point that they'd be committing perjury on line 1 of an affidavit, do you think BHBH will have to contact PULL admins to authenticate those posts (and mind you, PULL, those posts are archived)?
Do you think they'll comply, or no? And if they don't, do you think they'll have to subpoena?
This is it kiwis. We have found the bottom of the stupid. Like zen explorers we have journeyed deep into the bowels of this steaming pile of shit, only to return at last to the source. To the place where it all began. Where we learn the very first accusation was made by a brain damaged woman on PULL who confused Vic with Monica's pedo ex boyfriend and thus convinced a gullible idiot named Allison Cooke to tweet about Vic and getting Armzgurl to launch a #movement. The stupid is connected, the circle is complete.
They were literally brain damaged.
whats the difference between spaniards and italians?
Spain won't change teams like 4 times.
That and if they cant be the captain they wont play.
On the one hand, I'm horrified that people tried to sink Vic's career by falsely accusing him of SOMEONE ELSE'S crime. Amazingly, it makes Marchi and Rial look even MORE repulsive because they were either too stupid to do their research, or were fully aware they were spouting complete bullshit (I mean, they always WERE spouting bullshit, but this makes them appear even more opportunistic and selfish).
On the other hand... God DAMN, this is too funny. Can we resurrect Hitchcock to make a movie about this? This plot twist is right up his alley.
The actual guy, the actual creeper pedo perv, was Monica’s ex. There is no fucking way she didn’t know. Especially after he was arrested for running off to do a Vegas wedding with a minor to avoid arrest. It begs the question, how many other tales of her ex did Monica publicly attach to Vic?
Perhaps she cut-and-pasted an altercation she had with Guardiola into Izumicon and replaced him with Vic.
That was the first thing that came to mind when this news broke.
That said, I'm still having issues figuring out why Rial couldn't have just outright said that Vic raped her, or tried to rape her. It makes no sense. If she's going to fabricate an entire incident that nobody that she's named will attest to in any way, why not go all the way with something that can only be treated as a he said, she said? She tries to malign the incident as sexual assault, but the reality is that she, by her own admission, made absolutely no signal to Vic that what he was doing was unwanted. She says that she "went along with it"-- a judge won't look at that as sexual assault. A jury won't look at that as sexual assault, because it literally isn't sexual assault. It's not even borderline-- she says that she participated in the act without even trying to say "no".
That's why I'm not entirely sold on my conjecture that her Izumicon incident being a xerox of an incident she had with Guardiola. Because, given the fact that this incident wouldn't even be able to be verified or debunked without her idiotically naming a fact witness that she would then proceed to not contact, it would have been better for her to just make an unverifiable lie that would get slack because of the difficulty in proving private two-party crimes like sexual assault.
And she did edit her story a couple of times:
- On February 19, 2019, she not once mentioned the attempted rape in her Twitter post.
- On June 30, when her response to Vic's lawsuit appeared, it mentioned the attempted rape. If Nick didn't catch wind of this situation, would it have ever been released that this happened? There was also a contradiction where it was claimed that Rial tried to resist Vic's aggressiveness, despite her saying in her February 19 message that she froze when Vic became aggressive.
- Then, in her deposition, Rial said the "went along with it", contradicting what she said in her June 30 filing.
I don't recall the discrepancy being with the mention of what she's been trying to frame as attempted rape, but rather what she did in the alleged incident. In her February 19th post, she says that she froze up because she was raped as a teenager and figured that she'd make the situation worse for herself if she fought back.
I think the word choice has been very deliberate with Monica's accusations. Rape is a serious criminal accusation, one without much room for interpretation and has a very well tested process in our criminal justice system. If she came forward claiming that Vic raped her, people (including any real HR personnel) would ask for a police report or some kind of real, physical evidence. Also, Vic would immediately fight such an accusation which is exactly what she didn't want or expect.That said, I'm still having issues figuring out why Rial couldn't have just outright said that Vic raped her, or tried to rape her. It makes no sense. If she's going to fabricate an entire incident that nobody that she's named will attest to in any way, why not go all the way with something that can only be treated as a he said, she said? She tries to malign the incident as sexual assault, but the reality is that she, by her own admission, made absolutely no signal to Vic that what he was doing was unwanted. She says that she "went along with it"-- a judge won't look at that as sexual assault. A jury won't look at that as sexual assault, because it literally isn't sexual assault. It's not even borderline-- she says that she participated in the act without even trying to say "no".
I think the word choice has been very deliberate with Monica's accusations. Rape is a serious criminal accusation, one without much room for interpretation and has a very well tested process in our criminal justice system. If she came forward claiming that Vic raped her, people (including any real HR personnel) would ask for a police report or some kind of real, physical evidence. Also, Vic would immediately fight such an accusation which is exactly what she didn't want or expect.