Morethanabitfoolish
kiwifarms.net
Yes, because things that are animated or televised reach an audience they never did before who have no interest in the source material. Invincible is going to be a fine example of this because the future to it is a winding road of mediocrity mostly and I look forwards to mediocre paid for articles talking about the bold twists in the plot that already happened years ago and were out there to look up.That's what worries me. Are we truly living in a world that's so illiterate, they get surprised by things that happened in books written years ago? The fact that most of Game of Thrones' audience were surprised about the Red Wedding and Oberyn Martell's death showed me that they barely read the books, even though they should have started reading the books after they got hooked by the end of Seasons 1 or 2.
So yeah, there are people who are legit asking whether or not Omni-Man can be redeemed as a kind of deep question about the character, when comic readers know the answer to that already.
Injustice comics were unmitigated drek, no clue on the games. But yeah it's been done many times, debatably when Invincible first did it it was a bit more novel. I preferred the Superman/Elite stuff because it was exploring the superheroes with no line they were unwilling to cross in contrast to Superman as opposed to the more common evil Superman niche. It's nothing great but it's reasonably solidly done.For me, I just go back and play the Injustice games or read Watchmen. This whole "Superheroes as assholes" thing has already been old hat when DC and Netherrealm made Injustice: Gods Among Us. Now, it might as well be its own genre. I mean, shit, even Dragon Ball Z had assholes (or former assholes) who served alongside the heroes like Piccolo and Vegeta. Adding another one to the pile won't rock the superhero capeshit landscape.