Hah, you should have been there when they made that article on Final Fantasy VII hentai.Kotaku writers confirm that they do not in fact understand how a blowjob works.
I won't even try to sugar coat it, I totally agree with you.This must be the most pathetic thing I've seen all day. How autistic do you have to be to play the elitist about cartoon porn?
This must be the most pathetic thing I've seen all day. How autistic do you have to be to play the elitist about cartoon porn?
The social justice relationship with porn is strange. They want it to be utterly ubiquitous, but also staid, matronly and uniform.
They also want it to have rape, incest and underage characters is not a problem. Socjus and their porn is fucking weird.
A big joke right now is researching these moral crusaders and finding out that they sexualize underage male characters.
AO3 maintains a policy of "maximum inclusiveness" and minimal content censorship, which has led to the hosting of controversial content including works depicting rape, incest, and pedophilia.[7][6]
Kotaku writers confirm that they do not in fact understand how a blowjob works.
Neither does Kotaku.
Okay now that I'm not heavily inebriated and have the time to sit down for a bit:This must be the most pathetic thing I've seen all day. How autistic do you have to be to play the elitist about cartoon porn?
Okay now that I'm not heavily inebriated and have the time to sit down for a bit:
My response was mostly because this is just the typical behavior. They('journalists')love to nitpick at the biggest flaws or create their own with the usual buzzwords or phrases. In this case they purposefully sought out bad 3D porn to even be able to say that headline, which is just as disingenuous as the stuff they do in any other field.
My drunk ass shortened it to to "shit tastes". Because in every field, in everything they look at, dabble in, and try to take on as a hobby, that's all they have. Cartoon porn is no exception, apparently.
And yet, ZQ still got positive coverage from them.