Why do these people have such a massive hateboner for Chris Ray Gun of all people? It's always him or Sargon they're going after.
Anti-Anti-SJWs & "Anti-Sargonism" - A subset of SJW that A-Log Youtube Skeptics
- Thread starter Feline Darkmage
- Start date
-
Sister services, email, and search will continue to be negatively effected by the attacks. I made a thread to talk about it, if you're into networking.
I bet in Chris's case they want his dick. Or the fact that he turned Laci to the dark side lol
MythCon 2018 has announced its guest list and the REEE brigade has returned.
Christie wants to hate fuck Sargon so badly it’s disgusting.
It's fun to laugh at Sargon on the occasions where he goes full exceptional individual, but how in the fuck can people like Kristi stand talking about him so much? He's so goddamn boring on a day-to-day level.
Hbomber is one of the few on the list I can tolerate. Then again his most recent video was fucking cancer so.
because that would require actual work beyond virtue signaling for patreon bucks
Cuz they wanna be the LGBT for victim points so they make up a gender or pretend to be bi or troon out.
I've mentioned Three Arrows in the Antifa thread, but I might as well drop his name here as well since he clearly fits into this thread. Three Arrows is a left-wing vlogger riding the wave of video think pieces on controversial topics.
YouTube Channel
Twitter
Recently, he has addressed Ben Shapiro on the fiery topic of gun control in Nazi Germany:
Here's another video from the Frankfurt school conspiracy theory (aka: Cultural Marxism), concluding that it is based on propaganda originating in both Nazi Germany and Red Scare-era America. He carefully notes the people mentioned in that video aren't Neo-Nazis, but base their talking points on alarmism and perceived superstition:
So far, so good. As seen in this thread, it's hardly controversial to suggest popular alt-right talking points have some serious blindspots, but the story doesn't end there. In a video response to No Bullshit's hot take on a review from USA Today on Dunkirk, Three Arrows misses a crucial point. The issue isn't over colored representation on screen. Rather, it's an attack on the review for the sentence, "The trio of timelines can be jarring as you figure out how they all fit, and the fact that there are only a couple of women and no lead actors of color may rub some the wrong way." It's completely immaterial whether the review is positive or negative. Does the author of that review feel moviegoers are that sensitive? It's certainly condescending. It can be said that No Bullshit's joke was in poor taste, but it doesn't take away from his point either:
YouTube Channel
Recently, he has addressed Ben Shapiro on the fiery topic of gun control in Nazi Germany:
Here's another video from the Frankfurt school conspiracy theory (aka: Cultural Marxism), concluding that it is based on propaganda originating in both Nazi Germany and Red Scare-era America. He carefully notes the people mentioned in that video aren't Neo-Nazis, but base their talking points on alarmism and perceived superstition:
So far, so good. As seen in this thread, it's hardly controversial to suggest popular alt-right talking points have some serious blindspots, but the story doesn't end there. In a video response to No Bullshit's hot take on a review from USA Today on Dunkirk, Three Arrows misses a crucial point. The issue isn't over colored representation on screen. Rather, it's an attack on the review for the sentence, "The trio of timelines can be jarring as you figure out how they all fit, and the fact that there are only a couple of women and no lead actors of color may rub some the wrong way." It's completely immaterial whether the review is positive or negative. Does the author of that review feel moviegoers are that sensitive? It's certainly condescending. It can be said that No Bullshit's joke was in poor taste, but it doesn't take away from his point either:
Man, I've been going down the rabbit hole of left-wing responses to Sargon of Akkad and discovered this gem courtesy xexizy.
Meet anactualjoke, a tranny anarchist who has released gems such as these:
Here's his Twitter profile.
Meet anactualjoke, a tranny anarchist who has released gems such as these:
Here's his Twitter profile.
Of course they advertise a wish list to ya know help them “transition”
https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/ls/ref...f_=cm_sw_r_cp_ep_ws_nF5FAb77K7KP1&ty=wishlist
Buy me shit you pay piggies!!!! Also note the size of the first item of clothing XXXL
Stock Photo James
kiwifarms.net
So are leftist youtubers using minimally edited logos of group or ideology they endorse is what skulls and mugshots in suits are to right wing ones?
https://twitter.com/KWintie/status/986888137283694592
https://web.archive.org/web/20180419163945/https:/twitter.com/KWintie/status/986888137283694592
This is a fun thread with a bit of in-fighting between Kristi Winters, Ranting Feminist and David Sherratt, highlighting Kristi's colossal hypocrisy and A-logging over the skeptics.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180419163945/https:/twitter.com/KWintie/status/986888137283694592
This is a fun thread with a bit of in-fighting between Kristi Winters, Ranting Feminist and David Sherratt, highlighting Kristi's colossal hypocrisy and A-logging over the skeptics.
You know what word bothers me? Reactionary.
I'm not talking the word when it is used to describe people who describe someone as SJW when something mildly leftist comes up. But that word seems to imply that reacting something with disgust is a bad thing. I mean what the fuck do you expect people to do when they see something that makes them initially upset? Of course, they would freak out. And it seems as if they use the word "Reactionary" even if someone spends the time to let the subject settle. Like I've seen people describe people who didn't like the results of the Count Dankula case as "Reactionaries", even though there are very much good reasons those people are still disgusted by the situation through further analysis. As if the only time you aren't a reactionary is when you simply hold that situation, to begin with. I suppose this is a personal gripe, but how come the word "reactionary" rarely gets used on people who blacklist someone for something mildly offensive, both anti's and sjw's? If anything those people are the real reactionaries.
I'm not talking the word when it is used to describe people who describe someone as SJW when something mildly leftist comes up. But that word seems to imply that reacting something with disgust is a bad thing. I mean what the fuck do you expect people to do when they see something that makes them initially upset? Of course, they would freak out. And it seems as if they use the word "Reactionary" even if someone spends the time to let the subject settle. Like I've seen people describe people who didn't like the results of the Count Dankula case as "Reactionaries", even though there are very much good reasons those people are still disgusted by the situation through further analysis. As if the only time you aren't a reactionary is when you simply hold that situation, to begin with. I suppose this is a personal gripe, but how come the word "reactionary" rarely gets used on people who blacklist someone for something mildly offensive, both anti's and sjw's? If anything those people are the real reactionaries.
Stock Photo James
kiwifarms.net
Reactionaries is also a term for people who want to bring the old world order, say, monarchists or religious fundamentalists. Not even hyper-conservative and unwilling to change status quo but outright desiring to return to the past, no matter how the rest of society may disprove of it, because they're convinced modern society is doomed and they're disregarding it for it's own good. Many of these progressive types to constantly label people reactionary are absolutely convinced they're on right side of history and that anyone vocal enough to oppose them is outright opposing the natural social progress of how things should be. Also often they happen to be part of insular communities or cliques with way more, so to say, progressive values, hence they're likely to find somebody from outside such communities but not outright conservative a reactionary.
Ladies and gentlemen, take a gander at this:
What's not to love about pseudo-intellectual fart huffing?
Layman is great, and I feel he sadly has a point. Popularity is not based on merit, and the anti-SJW channels are slowing down in terms of growth, whereas speds like Shaun are continuing to grow in popularity because they offer a new, contrarian perspective that sounds intelligent to the average leftie, and have rabid and sycophantic fanbases who will defend them to the end. This is true of many anti-SJW channels too, but there are some good channels like Layman and Vernaculis out there who have avoided this.
Separating leftist content creator and right-wing content creators are oversimplifying how the youtube landscape is changing. Assuming strictly right-leaning channels are getting stagnant, I personally disagree since Infowars and Steven Crowder is still going strong, the small left youtube channels aren't really making any significant mark on youtube. Most rising channels are fairly apolitical or pushing out content frequently without any political reasons. He mentions H3H3 and Idubbbz, but the fact they exist should be clear that the left won't win. Just because they are entertainment doesn't mean they are out of the equation entirely. Additionally, strong left entertainment channels aren't prevalent on youtube.
Also, the reason why the right is falling out of relevance is less about having a common enemy, and more that their effort to expand their brand tend to end quickly or badly.
Also @11:38 looking at the social blade of these channels, the presentation of the stats are misleading. Those "right" channels still continue to get more views than most left channels.
Also, the reason why the right is falling out of relevance is less about having a common enemy, and more that their effort to expand their brand tend to end quickly or badly.
Also @11:38 looking at the social blade of these channels, the presentation of the stats are misleading. Those "right" channels still continue to get more views than most left channels.
I think it's important to note he's talking about trajectory and specifying it to the political Youtube circle. With regards to trajectory, the left-wing channels have more momentum than the right-wing channels; we just don't know where they'll peak yet in terms of growth. As for the political Youtube circle, I'd say channels like Infowars and Steven Crowder (especially the former) are above it. Even Sargon is starting to move past it now by doing more real life events, but channels like Hbomber and Shaun are firmly cemented in it, whereas the anti-SJW's are represented by autists like No Bullshit and Cognitive Thought now. Not that that makes Hbomber or Shaun good, but they've got a much easier battle on their hands now.
Similar threads
A part of the tumblr subculture with high levels of sperging and edgyness.
Severely paranoid thin-skinned attention whore with hate/real boner for Ralph, Null, Jim, BSV, etc. "Right kind of gay" and "verified female". Legally banned from KF, 13 socks and counting
