Dude, he has an 800 page thread here.would mister metokur be an anti cow? he seems not te be really ever in shit and comes out on top
Dude, he has an 800 page thread here.would mister metokur be an anti cow? he seems not te be really ever in shit and comes out on top
Lindy irritated me, and a lot of other people, when he tried to compare the Bren to the MG34/42. That video was a comedy of errors, and he got ratio'd pretty hard.
Other than that, he's okay. Not a cow. Not the best military historian either though.
There's a guy named TiK, who does some insanely deep dives on WW2 battles. I suppose he's an anti-cow of sorts.
Hitler's socialism was his racism. So those of you who deny that Hitler was a socialist, you're actually denying the holocaust. ... Marxist holocaust denialists refuse to accept Hitler's socialism. Stalin painted Nazism and fascism as the same thing: the end stage of capitalism. This was supposedly proof that capitalism was failing, and thus the world socialist paradise was just around the corner. Which means that everything that is national socialism or fascism must be explained as capitalism. Go on then, marxists, explain to me: How did the free market result in the holocaust? Which private business owned and marketed the holocaust. Marxist holocaust denialists have no answer to these questions. They have no explanation - I can explain it! But they can't. This is why holocaust denialist laws exist, because marxist holocaust denialist historians cannot explain the ideological reasoning for the holocaust. So they've resorted to creating laws that prop up their narrative.
Well, I dare. I dare to question it, because it turns out that these wonderful marxists are denying the holocaust. It turns out that these wonderful socialists are promoting and justifying theft and murder. It turns out they're the ones who are immoral. It turns out that their ideology is undefendable. Those who control the past, control the future, and the marxists control the past. Since the cold war era, if not much much earlier, socialists have invaded the universities, and have been miseducating the youth. Think about it. WHO writes the history books? Public, socialised, state academic, historians. And who teaches in these public, socialised, state schools? People who believe in socialised control of the means of production. These socialised state historians and these socialised state academics have the most to gain from have the most to gain from the furhter expansion of the public, socialised, state sector. So they're pushing a false narritive of history, a false narritive of the news, a false definition of the words we use in everyday language, like: state. All as a way of defending "real socialism": the state. They've spun history through the lens of class warfare, gender warfare, racial warfare, calling this "social science." They've warped society into misunderstanding the true nature of socialism and capitalism. Most don't even know the meaning of the terms and when you point them out, backed by a host of sources and examples from their own literature, actual evidence, you get told: "You don't know what you're talking about."
I wouldn't call him a cow (nor an anti cow, now), but he has become what he mocked others for (taking money and not making anything, cancer or not).would mister metokur be an anti cow? he seems not te be really ever in shit and comes out on top
To be fair a good amount of the 800 pages is his fanboys vs people who are so upset at Jim he lives rent free in their heads. Its a fucking shit show, where both sides are just covered in, and throwing shit at each other.Dude, he has an 800 page thread here.
TiK is a nutcase and doesn't have a clue about anything he talks about. Here are some prime quotes:
I particularly like the 'you get told you don't know what you're talking about if you rant about the lunacy i'm going on about (gee I wonder why he came up with that gem)
source
and then there is this. You know, literally making the hall of fame for the bad history subreddit
Lets not forget you're talking about a guy who did an insane 4 hour video rant spouting utter nonsense from start to finish about how hitler is actually a socialist and how the eastern front was some kind of civil war between socialists and who publicly belittles anybody who questions anything he says. This is after claiming all kinds of marxist conspiracy in academia horseshit as an excuse as to why nobody paid attention to his 'theories' in school. If anything he's bordering on being a cow himself. If you look at his youtube subs they include sargon, computing forever and jordan peterson. I can't say that surprises me one bit
That said i'll add the host of that townsends youtube channel. he avoids controversy like the plague and has a hardon for the 18th century...even if a weirdly large amount of his stuff actually comes from the 17th and 19th centuries
His video on The Bayeux Tapestry is fantastic. Those little animationsI love Lindybeige. He can be pretty lolworthy, especily when it comes to the French, but he is very likeable.
Jim Hightower. But he's old.As people cite plenty of good examples, being just anticow is too easy. Since most anti-cows are slightly right or neutral politically, I think a hardmode anticow is one of a clear lefty bent.
So, anyone with an example of reasonably sane lefties? Ie opposite of breadtube, yet proselytizing liberal message?
Or George Carlin (but he's dead). I was thinking more in the confines of traditional cow pastures, ie youtubes, social media etc. I'm inclined to nominate The Right Opinion, who IMO does pretty well considering this is the lolcow breedding grounds of youtube commentary. He's not high profile or vocally lefty "enough" tho.Jim Hightower. But he's old.
Jimmy Dore is utterly fucking insane on anything with police. Other than that, I kinda like him. I he had a baby with Saagar Enjeti, I would have him round for tea. Then I would arrest him.As people cite plenty of good examples, being just anticow is too easy. Since most anti-cows are slightly right or neutral politically, I think a hardmode anticow is one of a clear lefty bent.
So, anyone with an example of reasonably sane lefties? Ie opposite of breadtube, yet proselytizing liberal message?
George Carlin is one of those that both sides are desperate to claim would have agreed with them, though. He absolutely detested the kind of people who ultimately evolved into SJWs, and in particular, their shitty, euphemistic language. He may have attacked more "right wing" people than he did "left wing" but he was not a fan of anyone, nor of humanity itself.Or George Carlin (but he's dead).
Yea, he mostly parodied the false dichotomy of two party system, but other than that he struck me as chaotic lefty through and through, including the party hard degeneracy and all. It's just weird how alt-right pretty much coopted this sort of chaotic chic (including the degeneracy and misanthropy I suppose).George Carlin is one of those that both sides are desperate to claim would have agreed with them, though.
This dude looks pretty legit, Matt Taibi talking points on crack. If I were to nitpick, it's that Alex Jones-esque zeal and clickbaity schtick which brings the mental image of John Oliver or Alex Jones - except Dore is actually talking sense as opposed to the former two. Just personal preference for presentation to not trust over-zealous delivery I guess.Jimmy Dore