Why are western progressives and left-wingers so fiercely anti-White? Whether they're basic bitch liberals who like Bill Maher or The Young Turks or revolutionary leftists who listen to Punk music or Chapo Trap House, both camps are united in their shared contempt for White people. Casual hostility towards even Whiteness itself, much less White people, is extremely common in progressive and leftist discussion spaces. Just look how leftists sneer using the word "White boy" or other such demeaning language only to backpedal when challenged by claiming such terms only refer to "White right-wingers". Tim Wise is especially guilty of this. This is far more common among left-leaning progressives and social liberals (ie: the limousine liberals / gauche caviar) which people like him or Jane Elliott belong to, but the revolutionary left has picked up on these attitudes as well via their anti-imperialism.
It's especially telling among the revolutionary left because they seem less invested in implementing socialism and much more invested in eliminating White political power. This is a stark contrast from the past when leftists used to complain that too many Americans fixate on race relations rather than class struggle. On the other hand, there are those who see race and class as inseparably tied hence the entire theory of intersectionality. There's also the political philosophy of Maoist Third Worldism that states the revolution will come at the hands of the world's poorest and most disenfranchised which precludes everyone in the industrialized world.
It seems the revolutionary leftists who see race as inseparably tied to class struggle won that debate because it appears every relevant leftist in North America assumes White political power and their demographic existence are obstacles to achieving socialism that can only be overcome by disenfranchising, marginalizing and diminishing White ethnic groups by any means necessary in a managed decline. Any White person is identical to the Pied Noir, Haitian French or Ulstermen, all permanent reactionary settler classes that cannot be rehabilitated unless destroyed. The left's hostility to the nuclear family is greatly contextualized when the family is viewed as an extension of Whiteness. The radical left presumes members of White ethnic groups are just the material basis for reaction rather than broad communities of family and loved ones. Thus, Whites are a threat to be neutralized. Everything that comes from leftist cooperation with neoliberal capital is based off the belief that White's very existence is a problem to be solved.
Theodore Kaczynski makes a very interesting case for the psychology of leftism that's quite riveting, and part of it does explain why leftists behave as they do. They're all very conscious of their social standing and want to be accepted for the sake of clout, but as thoughtful as his premise is, I refuse to believe anti-White attitudes have anything to do with self-loathing or feelings of inferiority. People who tend to hate themselves are self-destructive and ultimately dangers to themselves before anyone else. These same self-described radical leftists could be confused liberals who have some sort of misguided kinship with revolutionary leftists as part of their telescopic charity or this could be the closest they can get towards having a real emotion by investing in the revolution as a pet project. This could also be cynical exploitation of social turmoil and betting on one side, hoping that they would be spared the proletariats' collective wrath and be allowed to exist in their society. The reasons are as numerous the individuals themselves, but what matters more is how is all translates into political action, and the acceptance of anti-White attitudes by the left strongly suggests tacit support for anti-Whiteness.
So tell me. Why do you think leftists wanna kill Whitey so much?
It's especially telling among the revolutionary left because they seem less invested in implementing socialism and much more invested in eliminating White political power. This is a stark contrast from the past when leftists used to complain that too many Americans fixate on race relations rather than class struggle. On the other hand, there are those who see race and class as inseparably tied hence the entire theory of intersectionality. There's also the political philosophy of Maoist Third Worldism that states the revolution will come at the hands of the world's poorest and most disenfranchised which precludes everyone in the industrialized world.
It seems the revolutionary leftists who see race as inseparably tied to class struggle won that debate because it appears every relevant leftist in North America assumes White political power and their demographic existence are obstacles to achieving socialism that can only be overcome by disenfranchising, marginalizing and diminishing White ethnic groups by any means necessary in a managed decline. Any White person is identical to the Pied Noir, Haitian French or Ulstermen, all permanent reactionary settler classes that cannot be rehabilitated unless destroyed. The left's hostility to the nuclear family is greatly contextualized when the family is viewed as an extension of Whiteness. The radical left presumes members of White ethnic groups are just the material basis for reaction rather than broad communities of family and loved ones. Thus, Whites are a threat to be neutralized. Everything that comes from leftist cooperation with neoliberal capital is based off the belief that White's very existence is a problem to be solved.
Theodore Kaczynski makes a very interesting case for the psychology of leftism that's quite riveting, and part of it does explain why leftists behave as they do. They're all very conscious of their social standing and want to be accepted for the sake of clout, but as thoughtful as his premise is, I refuse to believe anti-White attitudes have anything to do with self-loathing or feelings of inferiority. People who tend to hate themselves are self-destructive and ultimately dangers to themselves before anyone else. These same self-described radical leftists could be confused liberals who have some sort of misguided kinship with revolutionary leftists as part of their telescopic charity or this could be the closest they can get towards having a real emotion by investing in the revolution as a pet project. This could also be cynical exploitation of social turmoil and betting on one side, hoping that they would be spared the proletariats' collective wrath and be allowed to exist in their society. The reasons are as numerous the individuals themselves, but what matters more is how is all translates into political action, and the acceptance of anti-White attitudes by the left strongly suggests tacit support for anti-Whiteness.
So tell me. Why do you think leftists wanna kill Whitey so much?
