Are men who go down on women faggots? - I saw it in the Sopranos

[HG 400]

Are you a faggot if you go down on women?

 

[Cthulu]

If cucks are faggots then these men are faggots

 

[Autismo Pinochet]

Well both men and women have an X chromosome. So it's at least half gay.
Either way you deserve to die of throat cancer if you do go down on a woman.

https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/261453.php
(I'm not trying to prove a point, I'm just providing a reference for the "throat cancer" thing)

 

[Clop]

Who doesn't love going down on hair and the smell of dead fish?

 

[From The Uncanny Valley]

They're heroes.

Have you SEEN A fucking vagina?

 

[AZ 594]

The clits just a really tiny dick.

 

[Sir Auroras]

If she's a virgin it's less gay. Otherwise you're putting your mouth where a dick has been and that's uber gay.

 

[RG 448]

i get all up in that shit idgaf

 

[ES 148]

Men are all gay.

 

[UnclePhil]

No. A vagina pushed into a man's face is the most hetero thing there is. His sensory input is 360 degrees of pussy.

 

[Diesel Boogaloo]

Ancient Romans knew the answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexuality_in_ancient_Rome#Os_impurum

Os impurum, "filthy mouth" or "impure mouth", was a term of abuse especially for those who provided oral sex. "Oral turpitude" was a favorite form of invective for Catullus, Horace, and Martial. An accusation of having an os impurum is an "extreme obscenity", so vile that Cicero reserved it for men of lower standing than himself, only implying that their debasement tainted their more powerful patrons who were his real targets.

It was a convention of obscenely comic verse that oral sex caused bad breath that was nearly toxic. "Whores of the alleyways" are contaminated from giving oral sex; Catullus refers to "the foul saliva of a pissed-over whore". The urinary function of the penis makes oral sex particularly repulsive to Catullus, who elsewhere reviles a Celtiberian for brushing his teeth in urine. Martial jokes that a fine perfume turned to garum, fish sauce, when it was sniffed by a man whose breath was putrid from oral sex. In another of Martial's epigrams, a fellator breathes on a hot cake to cool it down and turns it to excrement. The bad breath and rotten teeth that are attributed to performing oral sex represent moral decay and a general corruption of the mouth's positive functions as the organ of a citizen's persuasive speech.

Because of the stigma attached to providing physical pleasure, a man who performed oral sex on a woman was subject to mockery. Cunnilingus typically appears in Roman art only as part of a reciprocal act, with the woman fellating her male partner in some variation of the "69" position. A wall painting from Pompeii, however, represents a virtually unique role reversal in the giving of oral sex. The woman who receives cunnilingus is tall and shapely, well-groomed, and brazenly nude except for jewelry. The male figure is relatively small, crouching subserviently, and fully clothed; he has an anxious or furtive look. The situation is so extreme that it was probably meant to be humorous as well as titillating; other paintings in this group show a series of sex acts, at least some of which could be seen as transgressive or parodic.

There is some evidence that women could hire male prostitutes to provide cunnilingus. Graffiti at Pompeii advertise the prices male prostitutes charged for cunnilingus, in the same price range as females performing fellatio; however, the graffiti could be intended as insults to the men named, and not as actual advertisements. One graffito is perhaps intended as political invective: "Vote Isidore for aedile; he's the best at licking cunt!"

TL;DR: It was more gay that getting your ass fucked.

 

[RG 448]

Ancient Romans knew the answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexuality_in_ancient_Rome#Os_impurum



TL;DR: It was more gay that getting your ass fucked.

Sounds like they were upset they couldn’t make their women climax.

 

[UselessRubberKeyboard]

Are you Russian? If so, the answer's yes.

If not, then the answer is no and congratulations on being a guy who knows how to satisfy a woman.

 

[sperginity]

If that's gay why the fuck would anyone be straight

 

[Doc Cassidy]

Pussies, yeah. Going down on a girldick isn't gay though imho

 

[Your Weird Fetish]

Sounds like they were upset they couldn’t make their women climax.

A lot of Roman academia and the upper political classes were closet cases. Women were supposed to just lie there while Roman men did their duty. They didn't want any "lascivious wriggling".

 

[Some JERK]

Sounds like they were upset they couldn’t make their women climax.

Dude, the Romans thought women got turned on by looking at cranes. I'm surprised they knew how to find a woman's vagina in the first place.

 

[Rand /pol/]

No. A vagina pushed into a man's face is the most hetero thing there is. His sensory input is 360 degrees of pussy.

He's a cuck for doing that tho

 

[UnclePhil]

He's a cuck for doing that tho

Only if it's full of sloppy seconds.

 

[GarthMarenghisDankplace]

What about women who go down on women. Chasing pussy is pretty straight right?