Hiragana
kiwifarms.net
Which is why God invented aids.
All for Same Sex Marriages, but those memes are bloody awful.
Australia SSM Plebiscite Salt - RAPE THE STRAIGHTS RAPE RAPE RAPE RAPE RAPE
- Thread starter LegoTugboat
- Start date
- Status
Which is why God invented aids.
All for Same Sex Marriages, but those memes are bloody awful.
Sincere people suck. Everyone should just communicate in memes and telepathic autism.
'Only the Illuminati, sell-out government and homosexuals want gay marriage': Protesters drape bizarre anti-same-sex marriage banner over a highway
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...rs-hang-bizarre-anti-sex-marriage-banner.html
There has been a spate of offensive anti-gay marriage incidents in recent days.
A Melbourne mother-of-two received hate-mail saying 'I hope your kids get AIDS and bashed', after she hung rainbow bunting from her home.
In Sydney a couple who painted their letterbox rainbow had it vandalised and dog poo placed on their doorstep.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4946538/POO-left-couple-s-step-gay-marriage-letterbox.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...rs-hang-bizarre-anti-sex-marriage-banner.html
There has been a spate of offensive anti-gay marriage incidents in recent days.
A Melbourne mother-of-two received hate-mail saying 'I hope your kids get AIDS and bashed', after she hung rainbow bunting from her home.
In Sydney a couple who painted their letterbox rainbow had it vandalised and dog poo placed on their doorstep.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4946538/POO-left-couple-s-step-gay-marriage-letterbox.html
The Valeyard
kiwifarms.net
I'm not saying that they are false flags by the Yes campaign, but they probably are false flags by the Yes campaign.
I'm leaning towards that too.
That wording....
Feral , Scum, Bashed and in Cockney 
Youse are sounding like proper fucking bogans there.No bush-pig or cunt. That makes me sad. The Yes people forgot that before their autistic as fuck stunts, they were at an incredibly high YES backing by regular people. The other stuff is making people vote No in spite.
In other news - even Bob Hawke thinks this was an autistic waste of money. Also anti-bigots sure love being bigots - an Anti SSM group was denied their booking at a Tasmanian casino and uni.
Imagine my shock etc.
I'm leaning towards that too.
That wording....
No bush-pig or cunt. That makes me sad. The Yes people forgot that before their autistic as fuck stunts, they were at an incredibly high YES backing by regular people. The other stuff is making people vote No in spite.
In other news - even Bob Hawke thinks this was an autistic waste of money. Also anti-bigots sure love being bigots - an Anti SSM group was denied their booking at a Tasmanian casino and uni.
Imagine my shock etc.
It looks like what a socialist alliance newspaper hawker would think 'bigots' would spout on the daily. Utterly autistic nonsense. Obvious false flag. Imagine what would have happened in America if SSM was put to a vote, it would probably be harsher, I'd imagine, any septics want to put in an opinion here, I know you're all looking at this vicariously, as much as @AnOminous likes to pretend he hates Australians he's interested in this as a smaller cognate debate to what could have been, somehow, a U.S equivalent.
*youse* is actually a pretty useful term as it's a second person plural in a language that typically doesn't use it. Pretty standard Australian colloquialism.
Last edited:
shitavious jenkems
kiwifarms.net
http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2017-10-05/same-sex-marriage-survey-forms-burned/9017328
Never change, Abos, never change
Residents of a remote Arnhem land community have destroyed about 50 same-sex marriage surveys in a fire, because they misunderstood the question.
Australian Bureau of Statistics deputy statistician Jonathan Palmer told the ABC a group of people in Ramingining, 560 kilometres east of Darwin, had believed the survey was asking whether or not a man should be "compelled" to marry another man.
Australian Bureau of Statistics deputy statistician Jonathan Palmer told the ABC a group of people in Ramingining, 560 kilometres east of Darwin, had believed the survey was asking whether or not a man should be "compelled" to marry another man.
Never change, Abos, never change
Natural selection.
Is this guy low-key implying that his dick can swing people the other way?
He later used the predictable outrage from the Murdoch owned press to try to hawk a quarterly essay he'd written.
Raping men to make them not homophobic sounds similar to raping lesbians so they wouldn't hate men.
sounds like the plot to a porno written by a sociopath
H
HG 400
Guest
kiwifarms.net
Don't be fooled, I've seen him using terms like "king hit" like the filthy fuckin rooaboo he is.
In other words a hentai.
No matter how many times it happens, it's always funny when people cheat themselves out of a sure victory and then blame everyone else for it. I honestly think the Yes campaigners could've done absolutely nothing and still won...or at least performed better than they are now.
The Valeyard
kiwifarms.net
The marriage survey is a start, but what happens next for equality?
The marriage equality campaign raises larger questions about freedom and equality that will bubble long after the vote
The marriage equality campaign raises larger questions about freedom and equality that will bubble long after the vote
In every campaign there is a tipping point, and the marriage debate probably hit that moment the weekend of the football finals. The support for rapper Macklemore at the rugby league grand final and the AFL’s public support for “yes” suggested that the equality cause had caught the popular imagination in ways that are probably unstoppable.
The “respectful debate” the prime minister called for has been largely absent. There’s been deceit and nastiness on the no side, and considerable hyperbole from yes supporters. I’ve heard claims that this is “the most difficult time for the LGBT community ever”, which ignores the far darker times of police persecution and Aids deaths.
But the campaign has raised larger questions about freedom and equality, which will continue to trouble our politics long after marriage is resolved.
Let’s assume the yes case succeeds, and parliament votes to legitimise same-sex marriage, adopting the bill already drafted by Liberal senator, Dean Smith. There will be attempts to add further “protections” for religious freedom to that bill, along the lines of some state laws in the United States which in effect allow people to override anti-discrimination law if they do so in the name of religious belief.
Most people would regard as unacceptable the notion that a bakery could refuse to serve a customer because she is Catholic, or a hotel could refuse to accommodate a Muslim couple. Yet these are the provisions that some US states are introducing to allow discrimination against same-sex couples.
Parliament is unlikely to follow the US path. Indeed, the marriage debate may lead to a renewed examination of the ways religious belief is already privileged, despite Australia being a religiously diverse society, where a third of us have no religious affiliation at all.
The national schools chaplaincy program, which seems to contradict the basic assumptions of a secular state, remains well funded by the same government which axed Safe Schools (although the current agreement expires next year). The largest source of school chaplains is Access ministries, which describes itself as “an ecumenical body committed to the basic doctrines of the Christian faith”.
The marriage equality movement has mobilised thousands of people, many of them involved in a political campaign for the first time in their lives. The most interesting question is where will these energies go, other than into immediate celebration and marriage celebrations.
Director of the equality campaign, Tiernan Brady, suggests it will go into community organising rather than mainstream politics. There is already considerable discussion about the next priorities, particularly the needs of those most marginalised within the queer community.
Next year Australia will take a seat on the United Nations Human Rights Council, which has seen several fractious debates on LGBT rights. This comes at a time when the situation for sexual minorities in many parts of the world is deteriorating, with increasing persecution in some countries in our region.
Under the Obama administration the US took the lead in fighting for human rights for sexual and gender minorities, and providing financial assistance to queer organisations globally. The ascent of Trump has seen their role decline, and there is an important opportunity for Australia.
The most immediate step Australia could take to show a commitment to LGBT rights would be to acknowledge the many people fleeing persecution because of their sexuality, beginning with those we are currently holding in indefinite detention.
People who have discovered demonstrations and campaigning through an equality movement are likely supporters of movements that seek equality for other groups and on other issues. The marriage debate has created alliances of convenience, with some prominent conservative politicians supporting the yes case.
But equality is an uncomfortable fit for conservatives. Both Labor and the Greens have been actively campaigning for a yes vote, clearly with an eye to winning new recruits. The spike in enrolments for the poll will hardly help the government at the next election.
The current poll was an invention of the Dutton/Corman faction to solve an immediate political problem. It would be ironic if they have helped create a new generation of social justice activists, seeking to extend the notion of equality far beyond the right to march up the aisle in matching tuxedos.
The “respectful debate” the prime minister called for has been largely absent. There’s been deceit and nastiness on the no side, and considerable hyperbole from yes supporters. I’ve heard claims that this is “the most difficult time for the LGBT community ever”, which ignores the far darker times of police persecution and Aids deaths.
But the campaign has raised larger questions about freedom and equality, which will continue to trouble our politics long after marriage is resolved.
Let’s assume the yes case succeeds, and parliament votes to legitimise same-sex marriage, adopting the bill already drafted by Liberal senator, Dean Smith. There will be attempts to add further “protections” for religious freedom to that bill, along the lines of some state laws in the United States which in effect allow people to override anti-discrimination law if they do so in the name of religious belief.
Most people would regard as unacceptable the notion that a bakery could refuse to serve a customer because she is Catholic, or a hotel could refuse to accommodate a Muslim couple. Yet these are the provisions that some US states are introducing to allow discrimination against same-sex couples.
Parliament is unlikely to follow the US path. Indeed, the marriage debate may lead to a renewed examination of the ways religious belief is already privileged, despite Australia being a religiously diverse society, where a third of us have no religious affiliation at all.
The national schools chaplaincy program, which seems to contradict the basic assumptions of a secular state, remains well funded by the same government which axed Safe Schools (although the current agreement expires next year). The largest source of school chaplains is Access ministries, which describes itself as “an ecumenical body committed to the basic doctrines of the Christian faith”.
The marriage equality movement has mobilised thousands of people, many of them involved in a political campaign for the first time in their lives. The most interesting question is where will these energies go, other than into immediate celebration and marriage celebrations.
Director of the equality campaign, Tiernan Brady, suggests it will go into community organising rather than mainstream politics. There is already considerable discussion about the next priorities, particularly the needs of those most marginalised within the queer community.
Next year Australia will take a seat on the United Nations Human Rights Council, which has seen several fractious debates on LGBT rights. This comes at a time when the situation for sexual minorities in many parts of the world is deteriorating, with increasing persecution in some countries in our region.
Under the Obama administration the US took the lead in fighting for human rights for sexual and gender minorities, and providing financial assistance to queer organisations globally. The ascent of Trump has seen their role decline, and there is an important opportunity for Australia.
The most immediate step Australia could take to show a commitment to LGBT rights would be to acknowledge the many people fleeing persecution because of their sexuality, beginning with those we are currently holding in indefinite detention.
People who have discovered demonstrations and campaigning through an equality movement are likely supporters of movements that seek equality for other groups and on other issues. The marriage debate has created alliances of convenience, with some prominent conservative politicians supporting the yes case.
But equality is an uncomfortable fit for conservatives. Both Labor and the Greens have been actively campaigning for a yes vote, clearly with an eye to winning new recruits. The spike in enrolments for the poll will hardly help the government at the next election.
The current poll was an invention of the Dutton/Corman faction to solve an immediate political problem. It would be ironic if they have helped create a new generation of social justice activists, seeking to extend the notion of equality far beyond the right to march up the aisle in matching tuxedos.
- Dennis Altman is Emeritus Professor of Politics at LaTrobe University
Ineedahero
kiwifarms.net
That bias tho...
Religious belief...
belief...
privileged....
What the fuck does that even mean? That's some serious :autism:. I know these dumb cunts think that it's just all the "White Christians" that are to blame, but Hindus, Buddhists, Muslims and Brown and Yellow Christians also don't agree with fag marriage. Are they still belief privileged?
Religious people tend on average to have better mental health, higher happiness indices, and much lower representation of crippling autism (unironic use there).
That's not what they mean, though. They mean that Christianity and its principles are super over-represented in the Western world, including the Anglosphere, and all this stuff about inherent rights and not raping the homophobia out of your opponents is against their beliefs.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
alt-right freaks out over boring center-right loser becoming Canada's opposistion leader
