It's true though. When I moved here, I had to prove to the immigration officer I was capable of withstanding the Australian environment. He put a big spider on the desk, and I just reached over, grabbed it and ate it.
Make me, abo dog
This chimpout may have been triggered by the Sydney diocese donating $1m to the No campaign.
Well, koala rapists, it seems your rulers have spoken on this matter.
It's the current year after all. ..
'Unacceptable': UN committee damns Australia's record on human rights
Australia has been excoriated before the UN human rights committee for its “chronic non-compliance” with the committee’s recommendations, drawing particular condemnation over the mandatory detention of children and the same-sex marriage survey.
Prof Yuval Shany, the committee’s vice-chair, said it was “unacceptable” for Australia to “routinely reject” the committee’s views, or “self-judge” international human rights treaties, telling Australia it could not “pick and choose” which laws it sought to follow and which rights it wanted to uphold.
Australia’s lack of implementation of committee findings was “completely off the charts for the committee”, Shany said. “It’s incredible for a country that claims to have a leading role in global human rights.”
While Australia had a “generally strong record” on human rights, Shany said, it had “very little to be proud of” in addressing failings identified by the human rights committee and other national and international bodies.
“There seems to be a misunderstanding of the purpose of the views of the committee – they are not an invitation to respond … they are an articulation of a specific duty to take action on Australia’s obligation under the covenant,” Shany said.
“While the function of the human rights council is not as such a judicial body, the views … are characteristic of a judicial decision … [and] represent an authoritative view.”
“While we can accept, in some cases, delay, because changes take time especially in implementing domestic legislation, it is unacceptable for a state to almost routinely fail to implement the views of the committee and in essence challenges the expert nature of the committee.”
The committee made particular reference to the government’s dismissal of the Australian Human Rights Commission’s 2015 report The Forgotten Children, which found that immigration detention centres were a “dangerous place for children” and called for a royal commission into the mandatory detention of children.
The then prime minister, Tony Abbott, dismissed the report as a “blatantly partisan politicised exercise”. The committee was especially troubled that the then commission chair, Prof Gillian Triggs, was asked to resign by the attorney general before the report was published.
Australia’s marriage equality postal survey was also criticised. A committee member, Sarah Cleveland, told the Australian delegation: “Human rights are not to be determined by opinion poll or a popular vote.”
Other issues addressed by the committee included domestic violence, transgender rights, the sterilisation of intellectually disabled women and girls, and the impact of anti-terrorism laws on civil liberties.
Australia’s refugee policies will be further examined overnight Australia time.
The country’s permanent representative to the UN in Geneva, John Quinn, said Australia was “not complacent” in regards to its adherence to international human rights law. He acknowledged there were things it “could do better”.
But the Australian delegation said the implementation of the committee’s views would have to be an area where the committee and the government “respectfully disagree”. Australia, the committee was told, does not regard the views of the committee and other treaty bodies as legally binding.
Amy Frew, a lawyer with the Human Rights Law Centre in Geneva for the hearings, said committee members were clearly dismayed at Australia’s disdain for the committee’s expertise and processes.
“The condemnation shows how far we have strayed from the promises we made to uphold the civil and political rights of Australians and people in our care.”
Australia’s periodic examination by the UN human rights committee in Geneva, comes in the same week as Australia was elected uncontested to the UN human rights council in New York.
The foreign minister, Julie Bishop, has nominated as priorities for Australia’s three-year term: gender equality; good governance; freedom of expression; Indigenous rights; strong national human rights institutions; and the global abolition of the death penalty.
Another arm of the UN focused on Australia this week. On Wednesday, the office of the United Nations high commissioner for refugees said Australia had responsibility to prevent the “looming humanitarian emergency” caused by its enforced closure of its Manus Island offshore detention centre while hundreds of men remained living there.
“Having created the present crisis, to now abandon the same acutely vulnerable human beings would be unconscionable,” said Thomas Albrecht, UNHCR’s regional representative in Canberra.
“Legally and morally, Australia cannot walk away from all those it has forcibly transferred to Papua New Guinea and Nauru.”
As a Muslim, I'm proud to support marriage equality
I know that discussions about marriage equality can challenge people’s personal views. These are not easy conversations to have. Believe me, I’ve had many. I still do.
After being elected to the New South Wales upper house as the first female Muslim MP in any parliament in Australia, the media immediately focused on the question of how I would reconcile my faith with the Greens’ support for LGBTQI rights.
While this same question would rarely be asked of an MP who identifies as Christian or Jewish, I wasn’t surprised.
In Australia there is a negative attitude towards Muslims rife with stereotypes. I have never shied away from publicly supporting marriage equality, not then and not now.
As a Muslim, I grew up with values of compassion, justice and dignity. For me it’s a question of removing discrimination and providing hope and happiness to all loving couples regardless of their race, religion, sex, sexuality or gender identity. It matters to me that everyone has the same right to enjoy love, partnership and commitment that my husband and I do.
Who can better understand the trials and tribulations of being a minority community than a brown, migrant, Muslim woman? We know what it feels like to face prejudice.
I came to Australia as a migrant from Pakistan 25 years ago. This is where both my children have grown up and where I’ve studied and worked. We’ve had many great opportunities but also faced barriers for no other reason than simply being who we are.
Australian Muslims are bearing the brunt of the current wave of racism, division and Islamophobia. While we ask others to defend our rights to our culture and religion, surely it’s incumbent upon us to do the same for others being treated unfairly. Discrimination against anyone should be an affront to us all.
Because of my continued support for marriage equality, including co-sponsoring the cross-party marriage equality bill in NSW parliament in 2013 , I’ve been told by some friends and family that “western” thinking has got to me, that I’ve been brainwashed, that I’ve lost my way and that I’ll burn in the fires of hell for eternity.
This hurts.
Like people of any other faith, Muslims come in all shapes and sizes and we have a variety of political views and values.
There are gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender Muslims. Some of us will be vocal about our support for marriage equality, others will vote quietly. For those still on the fence, please consider this: marriage equality doesn’t mean anyone will be forced to do anything they don’t want to. It just means that other people will have the same rights as heterosexual people who are free to marry the person they love. Why would we deny this basic right to any other couple?
That’s why my husband, my children and I are voting yes , publicly and proudly. As a mother, I can’t fathom the idea that in 2017 there are Australians, particularly young people, whose very identity is being challenged in public debate.
Multicultural ethnic communities are not homogeneous conservative caricatures that the media makes us out to be. Groups like Muslims for Marriage Equality, the Australian Council of Hindu Clergy, the Asian Australian Alliance and the Arab Council support civil marriage because they know, perhaps better than most, that all Australians must be treated equally.
We want our LGBTIQ friends and loved ones to have the same rights we have. It’s that simple.
- Dr Mehreen Faruqi is a NSW Greens MP and the Greens spokeswoman on multiculturalism.
bugman
Check again -
In diplomacy speak that's how they say 'ahaahahahaha, go fuck yourself.'
What I don't undertand is why you would want to force somebody to make something for your wedding. It's a commission, if they don't want my money, why would I insist on that person on particular when they'll likely do a shitty job just as an extra fuck you?
