Honestly, Trump is not playing with fire
He's playing with fucking "NUKE THE NET" button
He's playing with fucking "NUKE THE NET" button
Battle for Section 230 - The Situation Monitoring Thread for Monitoring the Situation of the Situation Monitor's Situation Monitoring
- Thread starter Null
- Start date
And we all know how that ended.
Everyone's been playing with it for a while now. It's just that he's the only one who decided that everyone should pay for this retarded bitch fit between him and twitter.
If this goes through, I fear for what this could spell for other countries. Because the way things happen, anything that occurs in the US with the internet always ends up finding its way to other countries somehow.
and we all know who runs the banks.
we could have a ten party system like france, it doesn't matter if it suddenly becomes a one-party system when it comes to the JQ, or blacks
Because /pol/ memed him into the presidental run and we all just rolled with it because Hillary was the horrible choice of the two.
I really fucking hope they realize what they've done.
Why the fuck was he the only other option? Couldn't have we gotten an actual competent person and not a fucking reality tv star?
Fuck if I know. You really expect me to know what goes on in the mind of some exceptionally idiotic conspiritards and politictards?
My fellow kiwis, we had a good run and shared many memories. We had a chance to laugh at some of the best autism and most disturbing humanity has had to offer. Now I guess the time to say goodbye draws nigh.
Last edited:
This would mean shitposting will end forever and trump is not gonna let that happen.
Honestly trust the plans niggers. Trump is our boi.
Honestly trust the plans niggers. Trump is our boi.
Put the rope around your neck and kick the chair.
Trump's plans don't extend beyond "how do I get out of this room five minutes from now without looking like I lost."
Ok, I get the banks wield a huge amount of political power but how does having less investors benefit them? If they have to police every transaction thanks to the US Patriot Act, they're missing a lot of micro-transactions form smaller investors because of the restrictions, not counting the resources needed to screen every single one of them. My point is, how is in the bank's best interest to deny access to credit? Isn't it the other way around?
Dude, he's literally crying over some twitter posts getting censored. He's been shown to be irrational, so who knows what he'll end up doing.
And if he does decide to get 230 repealed, it's obvious that no one, except the outright most deluded of Trumptards, would want to vote him back in. But like I said, who knows? Could be just Trump thowing a hissyfit like always and he'll soon turn his attention to some other event, could be him actually being serious and him being as much of a boomer as the rest of the US politicians.
Either way, your post is dumb and you should be ashamed.
Pretend for a second you are a multi-trillion dollar corporation that controls the flow of capital in almost every country. The countries you don't do business with (Russia, China, Iran, and the DPRK) are under intense international sanctions. More than the amount of money you have, is the power and influence you wield over the flow of money. You can turn off entire companies like a spigot and no one has any authority to challenge you. You maintain secret blacklists which you share with your 'competition' (MasterCard, Visa, Amex, Diner's all use the same terminated mechant files).
What do you need 3% of $40,000/yr for? What do you need 3% of $40m/yr for? You don't. That money is literally worthless to you, and in many times is in direct opposition to your interests. If a website can operate on $40,000/yr but promotes ideas against your interests, then it does far in excess of $1200/yr worth of damage.
This is the beating heart of the 'conspiracy'.
Large
kiwifarms.net
Vote Ted K.
YOU SHOULDVE DONE IT
Trump is the smartest president to sit in the office since Eisenhower. I don't know where you get this thing from.
Similar threads
"How to Ban End-to-End Encryption Without Actually Banning It"
