Careercow Benjamin Hyde / JekoJeko / Unnecessary exclamation mark! - Loliconnoisseur, always winning.

RedditMoment

I'm just a man in love, what's wrong about that?
Why do lolicons try this hard to defend their right to jerk it to children? It doesn't matter if it's fictional or not, the fact of the matter is you get your jollies off to kids in sexualized situations. I know I'd never let these low-t's around my kids no matter how much they say "durr hurr it's only fictional I would never try it against irl children!!!" :cans:
 
Why do sociopaths try this hard to defend their right to kill people in video games? It doesn't matter if it's fictional or not, the fact of the matter is you get your jollies off to killing people in violent situations. I know I'd never let these low-t's around me or my friends/family no matter how much they say "durr hurr it's only fictional I would never try it against irl people!!!" :cans:
 

Peach Pit

True & Honest Fan
Why do sociopaths try this hard to defend their right to kill people in video games? It doesn't matter if it's fictional or not, the fact of the matter is you get your jollies off to killing people in violent situations. I know I'd never let these low-t's around me or my friends/family no matter how much they say "durr hurr it's only fictional I would never try it against irl people!!!" :cans:

lolicon isn't inherently child abuse or pornography, you're just pretty gross and we reserve the right to think you're a degenerate
 
Why do sociopaths try this hard to defend their right to kill people in video games? It doesn't matter if it's fictional or not, the fact of the matter is you get your jollies off to killing people in violent situations. I know I'd never let these low-t's around me or my friends/family no matter how much they say "durr hurr it's only fictional I would never try it against irl people!!!" :cans:
FPS gamers don’t typically wind up getting caught with illegal firearms and explosives and an extensive internet history openly fantasizing about going on mass killings, but lolicon fans do have a marked tendency to get caught with tons of actual kiddie porn and an extensive internet history openly fantasizing about shoving their dicks into children.
 
FPS gamers don’t typically wind up getting caught with illegal firearms and explosives and an extensive internet history openly fantasizing about going on mass killings, but lolicon fans do have a marked tendency to get caught with tons of actual kiddie porn and an extensive internet history openly fantasizing about shoving their dicks into children.
This is just complete nonsense, almost every major mass shooter in the last 10-20 years has been found to be into FPS games. There are literally mods based around simulating the scenes of mass shootings and GTA is one of the highest selling pieces of media EVER and it is solely based around being a criminal and hurting people. The latter half is just made up, there is no common tendency of lolicons to be caught with actual CP, I would genuinely love to see evidence suggesting otherwise. If anything I've seen more instances of people who are anti-lolicon being actual child abusers.

lolicon isn't inherently child abuse or pornography, you're just pretty gross and we reserve the right to think you're a degenerate
I don't mind if you find it gross, the issue is when people take it to an autistic level claiming it's actual abuse or needs to be banned and people who are into it or produced it harmed.
 
This is just complete nonsense, almost every major mass shooter in the last 10-20 years has been found to be into FPS games.
So were almost all their victims, most likely. Violent video game consumption is far more prevalent than lolicon consumption other than in perhaps the middle east but there is no correlation between FPS consumption and murdering people. Lolicon is a different story entirely, and your attempt to compare apples to fleshlights is as suspicious as it is retarded.
 
So were almost all their victims, most likely. Violent video game consumption is far more prevalent than lolicon consumption other than in perhaps the middle east but there is no correlation between FPS consumption and murdering people. Lolicon is a different story entirely, and your attempt to compare apples to fleshlights is as suspicious as it is retarded.
Sorry man but just because you say it's different and not comparable doesn't just make it so, you need to actually provide an argument as to why getting a dopamine hit from tourturing a hyperealistic human in GTA is fine but getting a dopamine hit from seeing Gwen from ben10 naked is immoral and dangerous. I doubt you could even give a number on how many lolicons exist, let alone the percentage of them that are into actual CP and go on to actually hurt children.
 

RedditMoment

I'm just a man in love, what's wrong about that?
Why do sociopaths try this hard to defend their right to kill people in video games? It doesn't matter if it's fictional or not, the fact of the matter is you get your jollies off to killing people in violent situations. I know I'd never let these low-t's around me or my friends/family no matter how much they say "durr hurr it's only fictional I would never try it against irl people!!!" :cans:
Coincidentally, every single loliconer I seen online always use this same type of "gotcha" when you call out what they're trying to defend as it is in it's pure definition. Really makes a man think. :smug:
 
Coincidentally, every single loliconer I seen online always use this same type of "gotcha" when you call out what they're trying to defend as it is in it's pure definition. Really makes a man think. :smug:
It's an easy way to put a mirror up to someone's face and point out their inconsistent logic. People often give violence a free pass while sexuality in general is held to a weird standard due to feelings. If it ain't broke, why change it up?
 

RedditMoment

I'm just a man in love, what's wrong about that?
It's an easy way to put a mirror up to someone's face and point out their inconsistent logic. People often give violence a free pass while sexuality in general is held to a weird standard due to feelings. If it ain't broke, why change it up?
Wanting kids to be protected from being sexualized is a "weird standard due to feelings" now I guess. This attempt to defend drawings of sexualized children is always amazing whenever I see it. I'm not one of those "fiction = reality" tards but you can't try to flaunt/defend jerking it to lolicon because "it's only a drawing sjw! >: )" and be surprised when people who aren't cumbrains want nothing to do with you or have you around their kids. Weebs and furfags are one and the same, it really shows.
 
Wanting kids to be protected from being sexualized is a "weird standard due to feelings" now I guess
1611011713564.png

We're not talking about children, we're talking about fictional characters, drawings, pixels.
Wanting to keep actual children safe is completely reasonable, I genuinely think the people involved with producing Cuties should have been arrested and tried, because they involved children, and I mean actual children, not a drawing.

This attempt to defend drawings of sexualized children is always amazing whenever I see it. I'm not one of those "fiction = reality" tards but you can't try to flaunt/defend jerking it to lolicon because "it's only a drawing sjw! >: )" and be surprised when people who aren't cumbrains want nothing to do with you or have you around their kids. Weebs and furfags are one and the same, it really shows.
Yeah like I said earlier on this very page, if you want to find it gross absolutely feel free, I'm not going to lose sleep over not being invited to come to your house or whatever weird situations you've imagined in order to "own the lolicons", no one really cares. You claim you're not a "fiction = reality" person but your actions don't support that, even in your own post you refer to them as "children" as if they're humans and not pixels or ink. It's also perfectly valid to point out how objectively inconsistent your logic is if you're someone who pays no mind to someone who might have spent thousands of hours killing actually realistic looking people in video games but then suddenly have an issue cause someone is into loli.

If you're against any form of immorality in fiction, I may disagree with you but at the very least that is a consistent logic, but if you're for one and not the other then it comes down to fact you're just going off your emotions "one makes me feel uncomfortable, therefore bad, the other makes me not uncomfortable, therefore okay" which leads to inconsistent (and therefore inherently invalid) "logic".
 

Similar threads

Leftist grifter who reported his boomer father to the Feds
Replies
50
Views
2K
Savior of the white race, genocide advocate, anime mind control porn enthusiast.
Replies
300
Views
28K
Artist who’s obsessed with Fanboy & Chum Chum, regularly draws and writes fanfiction of child porn and child abuse
Replies
276
Views
52K
Top