All of you are severely autistic and this argument is gay.
Careercow Benjamin Hyde / JekoJeko / Unnecessary exclamation mark! - Loliconnoisseur, always winning.
- Thread starter Null
- Start date
-
Sustained Denial of Service attacks. Paid for botnet. Service will continue to be disrupted until I can contact other providers and arrange a fix. Sister services to the forum will have longer downtime. There's still ongoing service-level attacks which are causing intermittent errors and general slowness.
I don't care if lolicon is legal, and you won't see me calling for people who consume it to be given the chair or whatever, but if you openly enjoy/defend it don't be surprised when people make fun of you and call you a degenerate, especially if you make it your entire life like Benjamin Hyde.
Feel like the shitty apparent sock account stirring the pot with their garbage "logic" is kind of taking over the thread, which is probably intended to be more focused on one person and not an obvious sock lol
Tad Loaf
kiwifarms.net
Anthing asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
I am new here, but you're even newer.
Yes, I am glad we can both read dates, thank you.
You-assert without evidence
Me-do you have evidence?
You-no
Me-Dismisses Tad entirely.
Thanks for giving me permission to do something I had already done.
Tad Loaf
kiwifarms.net
Jumping in mid-conversation with another person doesn't make me the initial asserter, who look I was replying to and like I said when he provides citations, I'll take the time to do the same.
You asserted a connection between videogames and mass shooters.
No one else did that.
You are the initial asserter of that claim.
I know that this is you covering for the fact you can't find a citation backing the claim you made, it's very transparent.
Tad Loaf
kiwifarms.net
It's not covering, I'm just not going to bother doing it when no one else is. Anything you're saying right now can be applied to the person I was replying to, so if anything you're doing my job for me.
Why not provide a citation? If you do and he doesn't, you've won the argument.
No, it couldn't, because you didn't ask for a citation of their claim.
You just made up bullshit.
Tad Loaf
kiwifarms.net
Because I prefer the idea that no evidence means you're wrong, since it applies to the lolicon situation as well. Also lets be real, it's a pain to dig up citations and shit.
Last edited:
So you made that claim without even checking for citations to make sure it's true first?
Tad Loaf
kiwifarms.net
No, as someone who lived through the last 10-20 years I've personally see almost every major mass shooter end up being into FPS games.
Actually collecting the various articles and such to present them is literally work, work I'm willing to do if the person I'm engaging with does the same, which is why I return to "When he does it, I'll do it"
If we want to stand on the point that not providing evidence means it's false, that's actually completely fine because it supports my poisition in the original argument regarding lolicon.
Anecdotes don't mean anything. I can say that every lolicon I've met has gone on to either consume actual CP or molest an actual child, but that doesn't make it true.
Again, if you do the work and the other person doesn't, you win the argument. Insisting that you'll only provide a source if the other person does first makes it look like you don't have one.
No it doesn't, it makes both of you look wrong.
Tad Loaf
kiwifarms.net
I agree.
I don't know what to tell you, we just have different priorities, I care more about showing he's wrong than showing I'm right.
This thread got real gay real fast. Why is it that cartoons are to faggots as lamps are to moths?
I agree. It's pretty sad that he has nothing better to do with his life than defend lolicon online 24/7.
Similar threads
Leftist grifter who reported his boomer father to the Feds
Savior of the white race, genocide advocate, anime mind control porn enthusiast.
