Careercow Benjamin Hyde / JekoJeko / Unnecessary exclamation mark! - Loliconnoisseur, always winning.

Furret

Author. Artist. Visionary.
I don't care if lolicon is legal, and you won't see me calling for people who consume it to be given the chair or whatever, but if you openly enjoy/defend it don't be surprised when people make fun of you and call you a degenerate, especially if you make it your entire life like Benjamin Hyde.
 
Yes, I know you just pulled that statement out of your ass then dropped in two vague words in attempt to make it defendable.
My reply was really just to point out to others that you are full of shit.
Anthing asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.

Feel like the shitty apparent sock account stirring the pot with their garbage "logic" is kind of taking over the thread, which is probably intended to be more focused on one person and not an obvious sock lol

I am new here, but you're even newer.
 

Not Really Here

"I would push the button twice."
Jumping in mid-conversation with another person doesn't make me the initial asserter, who look I was replying to and like I said when he provides citations, I'll take the time to do the same.
You asserted a connection between videogames and mass shooters.
No one else did that.
You are the initial asserter of that claim.

I know that this is you covering for the fact you can't find a citation backing the claim you made, it's very transparent.
 
You asserted a connection between videogames and mass shooters.
No one else did that.
You are the initial asserter of that claim.

I know that this is you covering for the fact you can't find a citation backing the claim you made, it's very transparent.
It's not covering, I'm just not going to bother doing it when no one else is. Anything you're saying right now can be applied to the person I was replying to, so if anything you're doing my job for me.
 

Not Really Here

"I would push the button twice."
It's not covering, I'm just not going to bother doing it when no one else is. Anything you're saying right now can be applied to the person I was replying to, so if anything you're doing my job for me.
No, it couldn't, because you didn't ask for a citation of their claim.
You just made up bullshit.
 
So you made that claim without even checking for citations to make sure it's true first?
No, as someone who lived through the last 10-20 years I've personally see almost every major mass shooter end up being into FPS games.
Actually collecting the various articles and such to present them is literally work, work I'm willing to do if the person I'm engaging with does the same, which is why I return to "When he does it, I'll do it"

If we want to stand on the point that not providing evidence means it's false, that's actually completely fine because it supports my poisition in the original argument regarding lolicon.
 

Furret

Author. Artist. Visionary.
No, as someone who lived through the last 10-20 years I've personally see almost every major mass shooter end up being into FPS games.
Anecdotes don't mean anything. I can say that every lolicon I've met has gone on to either consume actual CP or molest an actual child, but that doesn't make it true.
Actually collecting the various articles and such to present them is literally work, work I'm willing to do if the person I'm engaging with does the same, which is why I return to "When he does it, I'll do it"
Again, if you do the work and the other person doesn't, you win the argument. Insisting that you'll only provide a source if the other person does first makes it look like you don't have one.
If we want to stand on the point that not providing evidence means it's false, that's actually completely fine because it supports my poisition in the original argument regarding lolicon.
No it doesn't, it makes both of you look wrong.
 
Anecdotes don't mean anything. I can say that every lolicon I've met has gone on to either consume actual CP or molest an actual child, but that doesn't make it true.
I agree.
Again, if you do the work and the other person doesn't, you win the argument. Insisting that you'll only provide a source if the other person does first makes it look like you don't have one.

No it doesn't, it makes both of you look wrong.
I don't know what to tell you, we just have different priorities, I care more about showing he's wrong than showing I'm right.
 

Similar threads

Leftist grifter who reported his boomer father to the Feds
Replies
50
Views
2K
Savior of the white race, genocide advocate, anime mind control porn enthusiast.
Replies
300
Views
28K
Artist who’s obsessed with Fanboy & Chum Chum, regularly draws and writes fanfiction of child porn and child abuse
Replies
255
Views
47K
Top