Careercow Benjamin Hyde / JekoJeko / Unnecessary exclamation mark! - Loliconnoisseur, always winning.

[Pizza Box]

Why do sociopaths try this hard to defend their right to kill people in video games? It doesn't matter if it's fictional or not, the fact of the matter is you get your jollies off to killing people in violent situations. I know I'd never let these low-t's around me or my friends/family no matter how much they say "durr hurr it's only fictional I would never try it against irl people!!!"

Hey Jeko. How's it going? Is it funny that we think it's wrong that you defend loli ?

 

[Make Anime Illegal]

Sorry man but just because you say it's different and not comparable doesn't just make it so, you need to actually provide an argument as to why getting a dopamine hit from tourturing a hyperealistic human in GTA is fine but getting a dopamine hit from seeing Gwen from ben10 naked is immoral and dangerous. I doubt you could even give a number on how many lolicons exist, let alone the percentage of them that are into actual CP and go on to actually hurt children.

To be clear, the argument is:
"If you are sexually attracted to drawings of X, you are sexually attracted to X."

What exactly do you think the analogous argument is when it comes to video game violence?

 

[TheBeanz]

Why do sociopaths try this hard to defend their right to kill people in video games? It doesn't matter if it's fictional or not, the fact of the matter is you get your jollies off to killing people in violent situations. I know I'd never let these low-t's around me or my friends/family no matter how much they say "durr hurr it's only fictional I would never try it against irl people!!!"

The difference is you don't beat off to video games.

If you go out of your way to look at scat porn, you get sexual arousal from human shit. If you go out of your way to look at drawings of anime children getting fucked, you're a paedo. It's not fucking difficult is it Jeko's sock account?

 

[Los Lobos]

Thread was pretty much inactive until this Tad Loaf appeard, so we are probably waiting for his threadban to end, if we want to have something new here in a short amount of time.

To be precise, what I meant wasn't that the thread was dead, coz it wasn't and isn't now. It simply moves way faster when someone here defends lolis, or if jeko tweets something about it.
So now we are probably waiting.

 

[Teiluna]

finally, some cow representation for an area near me!

so when will his encrypted hard drive be found?

 

[CatParty]

 

[Massa's Little Buckie]

His thread was fucking dead. Poor faggot misses us.

 

[Pizza Box]

View attachment 1926609View attachment 1926610

Did he just start talking about the thread just so it can be noticed again? Sounds like the pedoboy missed us.

 

[Furret]

View attachment 1926609View attachment 1926610

We missed you too, Ben. Welcome back.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Did he just start talking about the thread just so it can be noticed again? Sounds like the pedoboy missed us.

Pretty much. No new lolis to gawk at I guess?

 

[Minionlover98]

My take away from all of this is that either people who are autisticly super defensive over lolicon and people who are autisticly super "critical" and "antis" of it are most likely secretly to be actual pedos themselves

Yes, I dislike the overzealous fictional police as much as the next guy, and yes, I know at the end of day "it's not real" and if I have to pick a position, I rather have people jacking it to fictional kids then real ones.

But to make your whole ass life around it? To make anti-SJW Twitter accounts mindlessly defending it and making a shitty culture war over this shit? lmao, personally, you are now the lolcow

 

[AnOminous]

My take away from all of this is that either people who are autisticly super defensive over lolicon and people who are autisticly super "critical" and "antis" of it are most likely secretly to be actual pedos themselves

I just like how they completely melt down when their fap material is criticized and feel compelled to justify it at enraged and cringy length. Who the fuck does that?

 

[IlIIlIlIlIlIllIlI]

My take away from all of this is that either people who are autisticly super defensive over lolicon and people who are autisticly super "critical" and "antis" of it are most likely secretly to be actual pedos themselves

Yes, I dislike the overzealous fictional police as much as the next guy, and yes, I know at the end of day "it's not real" and if I have to pick a position, I rather have people jacking it to fictional kids then real ones.

But to make your whole ass life around it? To make anti-SJW Twitter accounts mindlessly defending it and making a shitty culture war over this shit? lmao, personally, you are now the lolcow

Actually retarded.

 

[Minionlover98]

Actually retarded.

Jacking it off to lolis, whatever it's fictional or otherwise, is forever going to be werid to normal people

Sorry that this offends you

 

[Los Lobos]

Jacking it off to lolis, whatever it's fictional or otherwise, is forever going to be werid to normal people

Sorry that this offends you

No, I think this guy doesn't like lolis

 

[Kruger]

He should've studied psychology if he wanted to understand human sexuality, there's a whole literature on it. I guess that would mean having to understand statistics and how research is actually conducted. Let me debunk some of his 'psychological' claims.

TLR Ben doesn't know what he's talking about when it comes to the psychological nature of pedophilia.

Therapy for any anxiety disorder, including PTSD, does include exposure therapy. A patient needs to willingly and carefully expose themselves to their fear. As such they grow in confidence, they don't lose the fear itself. But that's for anxiety disorders not sexual attraction. There is no hard 'cure' for sexual attractions of any kind, just suppression which is not the same brain mechanism for anxiety and overcoming it. Anxiety is avoidant behavior while sex is approach behaviour. From the victims point of view, lolicon isn't the fucking 'trigger' of their PTSD, its fucking abuse so exposure to lolicon wouldn't work anyway.

I agree that age play and pedophilia are not necessarily the same thing BUT are definitely connected. Peadophilia is attraction to the prepubescent form. Clearly an adult, no matter how hard they try won't have the same body structure as a child so in that sense they're distinct. Being aroused by an adult form even disguised as a child is not the same as arousal from a child. But clearly, trying to attain the form of a child for sexual gratification is in service of prepubescent attraction. He's right pedos aren't attracted to the childish performance but the prepubescence itself but then says it is not the sheer form of loli that attracts pedos. This is an out and out contradiction in two sentences. If you like lolicon you're a pedo. Pure and simple.

Where does he get the data for only 1% who watch cp commit offences against minors. First of all, participants lie all the time. Second, a well known phenomena in psychological research is the responses bias, where participants tell researchers what they think researchers want to hear. Where do they find pedophiles to question in the first place, it's hard enough to find participants for any study. An outlier in statistics is a data point within a data set that seems wrong, an error or just a participant who is very distinct from the other participants in a given study. A reaction time of less than 100ms for example. However, researchers aren't allowed to remove that data point from the statistical analysis unless there is very good reason for it, a reaction time of 0 or a reaction time that is unreasonably long, otherwise that data point stays in regardless. Plus, he misses the point, that in order to produce cp those making cp are committing an offence against a minor.... So it really doesn't matter how many pedos watch cp and never commit an offence. For every video, an offence was committed. Just because two things correlate doesn't mean they are related. In fact correlations are mostly used in research to justify further investigation with the data and not used as conclusive evidence. Of course he will have a 'correlation' he has what you call a sampling bias. All the people he talks to believe the same thing so the participant pool he's drawing from are skewed one way.

Finally, the pictures he present as 'an exploration of child abuse' are not drawn in an horrific way meant to 'shock and horrify', they're drawn to attract.

 

[Baron Vain]

Its pretty funny how both this dude and BenTheLooney have the same names, considering both are ardent defenders of lolicon and other sick shit.