Don't. It's dog shit.I keep meaning to get around to reading the sequel, which was described to me as a frank portrayal of how Hollywood eats people and spits out the gristle.
Don't. It's dog shit.I keep meaning to get around to reading the sequel, which was described to me as a frank portrayal of how Hollywood eats people and spits out the gristle.
How so?Don't. It's dog shit.
It honestly opens pretty well but it devolves into a gory whodunnit that is both uninteresting and shockingly short.How so?
I'm willing to bet the less than stellar movie adaptation of "Less than Zero" has a lot to do with the public and the media ignoring the horrific shit in that book still go unnoticed.Most people don't know this book but it is actually more fucked up than American Psycho, just not in a way that got media attention.
The same is true about the American Psycho movie. Really, the only good thing about that was Christian Bale's performance.I'm willing to bet the less than stellar movie adaptation of "Less than Zero" has a lot to do with the public and the media ignoring the horrific shit in that book still go unnoticed.
I realized this book was just fucking with me at the point Patrick Bateman was lecturing us about how Phil Collins was vastly superior to Peter Gabriel in their respective solo careers. At some point in the book, you realize you're just being fucked with, with absolute idiocy, and Bateman is either a complete cunt or is just fucking with you.To be fair, so much of the book's experience is about having your brain beaten into submission by wave after wave of awful shit that I don't think it's possible to adapt it at theatrical length. At a certain point I started skimming a lot of it. "Okay, this latest horrible torture goes on for the next five-six pages, lemme move on to the next bit where something else happens."
Truly horrifying; someone finds Peter Gabriel good.I realized this book was just fucking with me at the point Patrick Bateman was lecturing us about how Phil Collins was vastly superior to Peter Gabriel in their respective solo careers. At some point in the book, you realize you're just being fucked with, with absolute idiocy, and Bateman is either a complete cunt or is just fucking with you.
Only an absolute moron would choose Phil Collins in a Collins vs. Gabriel deathmatch.
Aside from the extremely toned down violence I thought it was an excellent adaptation. The violence that remained I would still consider effective.The same is true about the American Psycho movie. Really, the only good thing about that was Christian Bale's performance.
I was very disappointed at everything other than Bale's amazing performance. It rescued a failed movie.Aside from the extremely toned down violence I thought it was an excellent adaptation. The violence that remained I would still consider effective.
Bale is great. I agree with that. But I think it was truthful to the book with very few omissions. I loved how it incorporated the music review chapters in a very smart way. The one flaw you can throw at the movie is that Bateman's mental illness isn't made as clear. In the book, he has hallucinations like seeing a giant peanut (I think it was a peanut) host a talk show. Not to mention the melt down he has where he crashes a car and calls a waitress a kike in a kosher restaurant.I was very disappointed at everything other than Bale's amazing performance. It rescued a failed movie.
I loved "cool it with the anti-Semitic remarks" when he had so many atrocities to his credit. There are reasons this movie is so meme-worthy despite its numerous deficiencies.Not to mention the melt down he has where he crashes a car and calls a waitress a kike in a kosher restaurant.
I loved "cool it with the anti-Semitic remarks" when he had so many atrocities to his credit. There are reasons this movie is so meme-worthy despite its numerous deficiencies.
The book, as pointed out above, eventually makes it clear that Bateman is the least reliable narrator and everything we're reading could be a tall tale or a fever dream. The movie I think is deliberately trying to suggest that possibility without coming down firm either way. I've never really been able to decide whether I like that aspect of it or not.The one flaw you can throw at the movie is that Bateman's mental illness isn't made as clear. In the book, he has hallucinations like seeing a giant peanut (I think it was a peanut) host a talk show. Not to mention the melt down he has where he crashes a car and calls a waitress a kike in a kosher restaurant.
The book makes it a little more obvious with the hallucinations, him meeting Tom Cruise in his building (and mistaking him for Kevin Bacon), keeping a severed head outside his apartment as a Jack O'Lantern, etc. I like that the movie made it more vague.The book, as pointed out above, eventually makes it clear that Bateman is the least reliable narrator and everything we're reading could be a tall tale or a fever dream. The movie I think is deliberately trying to suggest that possibility without coming down firm either way. I've never really been able to decide whether I like that aspect of it or not.
This one sounds really interesting, reminds me of the book Programmed to KillTRANCEformation of America - Cathy O'Brien
I felt this deserved a mention as several users mentioned the ubiquitous Sov Cit genre. Cathy is a woman who alleges that she was a part of an MK Ultra-like experiment called Project Monarch. She claims to have been programmed as a spy, a sex slave, and a sacrificial lamb--- All for the "elites". That is, yknow, the Bushes, the Rockefellers, Dick Cheney, and a bunch of country music stars (like Johnny Paycheck). We're treated to a dizzying, psychotic narrative that is somewhat hard to read in structure, but nauseatingly descriptive. She does her best to explain how 'mind control' and psy-ops work, the network of evil Freemason Pedophile Jews that Run the World, and just how big Cheney's rapetastic cock is. Plenty of insight to a symptom known as 'loose associations' (which she interprets as commands). Bonus scene of Hilary Clinton mutilating her vagina to look like a witch face. [whatthefuckamireading.jpg]
the truth is out there
Getting my replies out of order because I didn't see this post at first. Yes, Ellis liberally cribbed from Raymond all across his career. Batman's Grave has a lot of the Raymond style of procedural in it.There was a popular TV crime drama in the 90s called Cracker, penned Jimmy Mcgovern, that drew superficially on the dark and unpleasant tone of Raymond's novels. Warren Ellis also appeared to be strongly influenced by them during his short-lived run on Hellblazer. It's a great shame that no attempt has been made to dramatise the books themselves. If they were filmed by someone who was sympathetic to the nuances of the material, they would make for very haunting television.