BreadTube - The Unofficial ContraPoints Dickriders Club and the culture / drama surrounding the community.

  • We are being DDoS attacked still and 12,000 people are reading about incest. Expect weird errors. Most should go away by refreshing. Emails (registration / password reset) appear to be working; be sure to check spam.

    THE MERGE IS ON.

Josterman

kiwifarms.net
Leon just posted a idea for a new video and him agreeing with the serfs EFA55E21-1218-4E03-A002-9727022860C9.jpegE47FE0EE-A679-48B1-87AD-6D262B9C2AC3.jpeg

here is his reaction to g7

C1AEEEA8-AC36-434F-84F9-3A3DFE1E2970.jpeg
and now soiboy avalone is defending tyt
 
Last edited:

Richter Blobmondo

kiwifarms.net
That's why tranny shit became so big, because all of these activists and activist organizations needed a new pet cause to continue after gay marriage was won.
I always assumed because even back then, (Stonewall and beginning of the gay civil rights movement) that trannies was there and was involved in someway

Sure you can now legally marry, but that doesn't change the fact you can't in other countries either
 

Shaka Brah

Patriotic Ass-Blasting Poster
kiwifarms.net
I always assumed because even back then, (Stonewall and beginning of the gay civil rights movement) that trannies was there and was involved in someway

Sure you can now legally marry, but that doesn't change the fact you can't in other countries either
Yes trannies and diddlers have been involved since the beginning, so I'm constantly shocked that anyone else is shocked that they're here now. Gay and trans activists are constantly telling everyone that this is true (and that they think it's a good thing) but nobody seems to be listening.
 

Neigh

Glue factory enthusiast
kiwifarms.net
I always assumed because even back then, (Stonewall and beginning of the gay civil rights movement) that trannies was there and was involved in someway

Sure you can now legally marry, but that doesn't change the fact you can't in other countries either
I'm fairly certain it's just the next cause after achieving the previous. Trannies have been present in these movements from the beginning but are usually sidelined. My theory is transgenderism is too much of a push for normal people to accept immediately. There is a feminist academic that theorized transgenderism comes into the mainstream when society is decadent and collapsing. Leftist activism in the US has no real care for foreign countries aside from trying to export its ideology. US feminists take on boutique causes while ignoring celebrities' sweatshop merch until the publicity cant be ignored. The best you get are awareness campaigns on social media and american leftist students trying to spread the message at their foreign university.
 
Last edited:

Neigh

Glue factory enthusiast
kiwifarms.net
I wouldn't discount someone's observations because of their affiliation. One can point to Rome and Wiemar Germany as examples of this cultural degeneration.

Pedophilia isn't being pushed very hard despite it being present at the creation of queer theory. Why is that?

Back in 2010 it was normalizing transgenderism for adults. Then it was teens. Now it's children. The leftward drift doesn't stop, not even for other countries to catch up.
 
Last edited:

Evo

yes, an actual nazi
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Fascism when you get down to it is Totalitarianism perfected with strong elements of nationalism. Fascism is total control of the state, which the state is people, the people of the nation and the people should give into the state because the state are the people and to go against the state, is to go against the people. The socialists tend to forget that alot of fascists, especially Mussolini and Mosley were originally socialists that saw the failures of internationalism and to attempt to mend the divide between labor and capitol and wanted both to move with "The State" towards a brighter future. In fact, when socialists attempt to say that Fascism is capitalism at its basest form, I laugh for they fail ot realize how interventionist that Ill Duchey was and that Hitler's "Privatization" really wasn't as it had much of that was given to those who would jump to the tune of the Nazi Party.

Though certainly what commies, socialists, and fascists have in common is a contempt for individual freedom, contempt for property rights, a need for an omnipresent enemy to fight, a belief that heaven can be achieved on Earth and their regimes being unhumane to outright murderous.
I could give you an entire thesis on Hitler's 'privatization' and the NSDAP economy post-MEFO bills - Schacht and MEFO bills were the only existing element of state-enforced privatization prior to the 40's or so, but to state that no independent privatization occurred at all is just fucking hilarious considering the German economy (while being compliant with the state, a concept that makes sense..a nation's economy should be wholly subservient to the nation that hosts said economy and the interests of said nation, unless you prefer deregulated economies) was essentially ran by things like I.G. Farben, Krupp and FW - Farben, despite being "forced" to parrot the party line, had little issues with going the way of the German state at the time, along with many other German industrialists; the mistake is believing the large majority of the German private sector at the time didn't want what the NSDAP introduced, because it did.

As for the rest of what you said, yes, fascism is a totalitarian, syncretic system that meshes elements of the left & right - D'Annunzio and Gentile both coined the phrase 'far-centre' when considering fascism and it's placement on the dualistic spectrum, and Gentile was the actual author of the Doctrine of Fascism; Mussolini's contribution compared to Gentile was fairly mute, and he was mostly an attendant ghostwriter for the book; fascism's earliest influences came out of syndicalist economic movements and drew from people like Georges Valois - the 'association' with socialism mostly goes that far: former fascists came out of syndicalist economic movements, thoroughly disillusioned with the internationalist and socially left-wing elements of far-left ideology; the entire shtick of fascism as an ideology and set of principles was to recognize the importance of an economy based on the working class and ensuring the working class was properly compensated for their work and had a proper place within the state without also pitting the working class against the rich and recognizing the sheer fucking idiocy of 'class warfare' notions that communists create - most fascists propped up class cooperation, as opposed to class warfare, and this derives from the Spengler-influenced perception within fascism of society as a living organism that has to be treated organically.

'Fashcap' exists, fascist capitalists, but they're as fucking funny to me as ancaps - fascism is inherently built to be opposed to capitalism and capitalist economic theory, but only to a point and that 'point' exists to prevent capitalism from reaching the grotesque, unregulated hyperactive stage it exists in today; in other elements, there is no problem in fascist doctrine with the use of capitalist economic elements in the creation of a foundation or the usage of the private sector - the complete removal of the private sector is retarded, unsustainable, toxic, and unrealistic; if you're attempting to make the argument that these fascists aimed to create a state economically similar to the 'all-equity, raceless, stateless, utopian all-worker commune' communists envision, I will debate you endlessly, friendo.
 
Last edited:

DumbDude42

kiwifarms.net
I could give you an entire thesis on Hitler's 'privatization' and the NSDAP economy post-MEFO bills - Schacht and MEFO bills were the only existing element of state-enforced privatization prior to the 40's or so, but to state that no independent privatization occurred at all is just fucking hilarious considering the German economy (while being compliant with the state, a concept that makes sense..a nation's economy should be wholly subservient to the nation that hosts said economy and the interests of said nation, unless you prefer deregulated economies) was essentially ran by things like I.G. Farben, Krupp and FW - Farben, despite being "forced" to parrot the party line, had little issues with going the way of the German state at the time, along with many other German industrialists; the mistake is believing the large majority of the German private sector at the time didn't want what the NSDAP introduced, because it did.

As for the rest of what you said, yes, fascism is a totalitarian, syncretic system that meshes elements of the left & right - D'Annunzio and Gentile both coined the phrase 'far-centre' when considering fascism and it's placement on the dualistic spectrum, and Gentile was the actual author of the Doctrine of Fascism; Mussolini's contribution compared to Gentile was fairly mute, and he was mostly an attendant ghostwriter for the book; fascism's earliest influences came out of syndicalist economic movements and drew from people like Georges Valois - the 'association' with socialism mostly goes that far: former fascists came out of syndicalist economic movements, thoroughly disillusioned with the internationalist and socially left-wing elements of far-left ideology; the entire shtick of fascism as an ideology and set of principles was to recognize the importance of an economy based on the working class and ensuring the working class was properly compensated for their work and had a proper place within the state without also pitting the working class against the rich and recognizing the sheer fucking idiocy of 'class warfare' notions that communists create - most fascists propped up class cooperation, as opposed to class warfare, and this derives from the Spengler-influenced perception within fascism of society as a living organism that has to be treated organically.

'Fashcap' exists, fascist capitalists, but they're as fucking funny to me as ancaps - fascism is inherently built to be opposed to capitalism and capitalist economic theory, but only to a point and that 'point' exists to prevent capitalism from reaching the grotesque, unregulated hyperactive stage it exists in today; in other elements, there is no problem in fascist doctrine with the use of capitalist economic elements in the creation of a foundation or the usage of the private sector - the complete removal of the private sector is retarded, unsustainable, toxic, and unrealistic; if you're attempting to make the argument that these fascists aimed to create a state economically similar to the 'all-equity, raceless, stateless, utopian all-worker commune' communists envision, I will debate you endlessly, friendo.
communism = capital belongs to the state, only the state gets to decide how it is used
capitalism = capital belongs to whoever owns it and they can do whatever the fuck they want with it
fascism = capital belongs to whoever owns it, but they have to use it in a way that aligns with the interests of the state
 

Ged's Forth

The Merge is on, baby!
kiwifarms.net
The laziest form of argumentation imaginable: laughing at someone's argument instead of addressing it. It doesn't even require the ability to speak, just the ability to fake a laugh. No wonder this waterhead lost to JF. Most of this guy's other points in this vid were just him repeating the points they brought up or describing them. What was even the point of him making this video, it's so low effort. Fucking weird.

Also, "The Serfs" pausing and making a face every time Sean made a Jew joke was hilarious. The guy's a massive Zionist if you ever check his twitter. Not that The Serfs would know, but still.
 

Ged's Forth

The Merge is on, baby!
kiwifarms.net
What is it with Breadtubers being so afraid of the Stitch and Adam show. First Vaush wants on, and then backpedels out, now Serfs is throwing shade. These faggots need to stop being afraid of some cartoon jew and adam.
I've noticed that and others have as well, as seen in this post from the Destiny thread:
I find it peculiar that during his CRT research yesterday, Destiny had an immediate, repulsive reaction towards a superchat message suggesting that he refer to "enlightened centrists" PSA Sitch and Adam Friended, who have already been doing a lot of investigation into it. It's not like Destiny isn't open to sources to his Right, and those two have repeatedly expressed fondness for him in turn, so does he harbor some one-sided personal beef with them or something?

View attachment 2256400
I know the enlightened centrism thing is a meme, but it seems to pose a bit of a threat to these debate bros. There is a real power to being able to admit that everyone, no matter where they sit on the political spectrum, can at least have a valid political point about something. It might seem obvious to most people, I remember there's a Chomsky quote that goes something along the lines of "There are issues on which I probably agree with Hitler, but that doesn't really mean anything", but a lot of these debate bros are autistic, and not being able to put their debate opponents in some nice neat box can be challenging to them. To be fair, the cartoon Jew and hollywood script doctor do seem to actually know what they're talking about a lot of the time, and Vaush in particular has a habit of not facing challenging opponents.
 

Similar threads

Infected RationalWiki
Whiny hugbox for spergs and a clusterfuck of neverending drama on a rapidly declining website.
Replies
3K
Views
398K
The Hilarious N̶e̶v̶e̶r̶e̶n̶d̶i̶n̶g̶ Splintering "Gaming" Forum Circus
Replies
36K
Views
7M
Top