BreadTube - The Unofficial ContraPoints Dickriders Club and the culture / drama surrounding the community.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
It's not really the average black South African's land either, Bantus are non-native too. Only the Khoisan are native to Southern Africa.
If you really wanna go that route, where land never belongs to anyone cause there were earlier tribes on it, fine.
Feel free to fight a war against SA blacks and win the land. I don't really care. I am not gonna support you though. My preoccupation is with Europe first, above all else, and with having a moral option to remove undesirable peoples from it at will.
 
If you really wanna go that route, where land never belongs to anyone cause there were earlier tribes on it, fine.
Feel free to fight a war against SA blacks and win the land. I don't really care. I am not gonna support you though. My preoccupation is with Europe first, above all else, and with having a moral option to remove undesirable peoples from it at will.
I think pro-white people would do better supporting indigenous people too bc whites have a claim to Europe for being the most native, we should support other's rights to their own lands too.
 
I think pro-white people would do better supporting indigenous people too bc whites have a claim to Europe for being the most native, we should support other's rights to their own lands too.
One of the best episodes of Myth 20th Century is the episode they did on American Indian Movement and how the fate of the White man on North American Continent will be similar to the Red man.

 
I can't believe no one has posted this yet.
BreadTube video essayist Noah Samsen makes paedophile accusations against a DGG streamer ChudLogic during the midst of a shit-flinging contest for completely unrelated.
twt286

Someone asks him why he calls someone a pedo where it isn't applicable.
twt285.jpg

Noah doubles down and looks like an even bigger idiot.
twt283.jpg
(Archive)
The screenshot he provided clearly states the person on the other end is of legal age, so what's even the accusation here exactly?
1692523826613.png


Also, HasanPiker liked tweet.
twt287.jpg

The post was kept up until his entire account got nuked shortly thereafter.
twt282.jpg
 
I remember this drama from a few years ago. I don't think Chud Logic is a paedo, because Hailey Bug Wife (and their maw/mawrself pronouns) turned out to be of age, if I remember correctly, although Chud Logic was much older, so it is arguably a bit suspect.

The most damning thing, for me, is that they were a tranny.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dan of Steel
I have no idea if this "ethan is online" fag is part of Breadtube or not, but he has the hallmarks of a Breadtuber (Unwashed, gross looking, wire-frame glasses, fat, the video being way too fucking long, taking sponsorships from fucking Raycons even though he's a leftist or whatever), but this video came up in my recs. I watched it, it made me MATI and I wanna bitch about it.
I'm not an art historian by any means, I have few artists that I like (Magritte, Bosch, Escher, etc) but it's only something I have a cursory interest in. However, I guarantee I know more than this retard, who cherrypicks fucking PragerU for half of it talking about what they're saying is le bad and that they're fascist because... they just are okay?!? He tries to defend modern art in a very shitty and shallow way, the thing that damns his entire video the most to me is that he has to explain why the modern art he's defending via context of it, which to me, means it fails as art. Your reaction to art whether you like it or not doesn't depend on context at all. So having to explain away why pieces of modern art are not shitty and vacuous shows why they suck.
He then also tries to conflate Charlie aka Cr1tikal with being a PragerU fascist because he said that modern art also sucks and his points were surface level similar to PragerU's. Even though Charlie AFAIK doesn't watch PragerU, and was coming to his own conclusion. So it's the typical woke bullshit of painting someone I disagree with as a nazi/fascist/bad meanie doodoohead because I disagree with them and I hate this person now. Bad video 0/10.
 
I have no idea if this "ethan is online" fag is part of Breadtube or not, but he has the hallmarks of a Breadtuber (Unwashed, gross looking, wire-frame glasses, fat, the video being way too fucking long, taking sponsorships from fucking Raycons even though he's a leftist or whatever), but this video came up in my recs. I watched it, it made me MATI and I wanna bitch about it.
I'm not an art historian by any means, I have few artists that I like (Magritte, Bosch, Escher, etc) but it's only something I have a cursory interest in. However, I guarantee I know more than this retard, who cherrypicks fucking PragerU for half of it talking about what they're saying is le bad and that they're fascist because... they just are okay?!? He tries to defend modern art in a very shitty and shallow way, the thing that damns his entire video the most to me is that he has to explain why the modern art he's defending via context of it, which to me, means it fails as art. Your reaction to art whether you like it or not doesn't depend on context at all. So having to explain away why pieces of modern art are not shitty and vacuous shows why they suck.
He then also tries to conflate Charlie aka Cr1tikal with being a PragerU fascist because he said that modern art also sucks and his points were surface level similar to PragerU's. Even though Charlie AFAIK doesn't watch PragerU, and was coming to his own conclusion. So it's the typical woke bullshit of painting someone I disagree with as a nazi/fascist/bad meanie doodoohead because I disagree with them and I hate this person now. Bad video 0/10.

Then he cries and wonders why AI is replacing artists
 
I have no idea if this "ethan is online" fag is part of Breadtube or not, but he has the hallmarks of a Breadtuber (Unwashed, gross looking, wire-frame glasses, fat, the video being way too fucking long, taking sponsorships from fucking Raycons even though he's a leftist or whatever), but this video came up in my recs. I watched it, it made me MATI and I wanna bitch about it.
I'm not an art historian by any means, I have few artists that I like (Magritte, Bosch, Escher, etc) but it's only something I have a cursory interest in. However, I guarantee I know more than this retard, who cherrypicks fucking PragerU for half of it talking about what they're saying is le bad and that they're fascist because... they just are okay?!? He tries to defend modern art in a very shitty and shallow way, the thing that damns his entire video the most to me is that he has to explain why the modern art he's defending via context of it, which to me, means it fails as art. Your reaction to art whether you like it or not doesn't depend on context at all. So having to explain away why pieces of modern art are not shitty and vacuous shows why they suck.
He then also tries to conflate Charlie aka Cr1tikal with being a PragerU fascist because he said that modern art also sucks and his points were surface level similar to PragerU's. Even though Charlie AFAIK doesn't watch PragerU, and was coming to his own conclusion. So it's the typical woke bullshit of painting someone I disagree with as a nazi/fascist/bad meanie doodoohead because I disagree with them and I hate this person now. Bad video 0/10.
What the fuck does interpreting a painting have to do with whether you vote for the Politician who support conservative economics or not? PragerU made a video about it so now it's a fucking political stance? The fact his big example is someone decidedly NOT conservative shows how baseless it is to make this about politics.

Bruh, this dude shits all over the Birth of Venus but praises a fucking rock because "it's cool" and "you can walk under it." I had to tap out there, this faggot.
 
Fredda popped up on my feed. He was angry because an alt history video about Cuba getting invaded by the US didn't portray the communist government favorably. He's legit angry because a fictional alt history video isn't realistic enough.
Fredda seems like put of all the Breadtuber he seems determined to try and pick a war with people who just want to talk about historical events and make alt history scenarios. But like every other Breadtuber he is an insufferable loser.
I'm Just Ken is a legitimate banger.

No wonder why the Trannies are seething at Righwingers liking the song.View attachment 5276565
I'm just here to say all the right wing male chuds in this thread.
You all are Kenough. That is all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coo Coo Bird
I have no idea if this "ethan is online" fag is part of Breadtube or not, but he has the hallmarks of a Breadtuber (Unwashed, gross looking, wire-frame glasses, fat, the video being way too fucking long, taking sponsorships from fucking Raycons even though he's a leftist or whatever), but this video came up in my recs. I watched it, it made me MATI and I wanna bitch about it.
I'm not an art historian by any means, I have few artists that I like (Magritte, Bosch, Escher, etc) but it's only something I have a cursory interest in. However, I guarantee I know more than this retard, who cherrypicks fucking PragerU for half of it talking about what they're saying is le bad and that they're fascist because... they just are okay?!? He tries to defend modern art in a very shitty and shallow way, the thing that damns his entire video the most to me is that he has to explain why the modern art he's defending via context of it, which to me, means it fails as art. Your reaction to art whether you like it or not doesn't depend on context at all. So having to explain away why pieces of modern art are not shitty and vacuous shows why they suck.
He then also tries to conflate Charlie aka Cr1tikal with being a PragerU fascist because he said that modern art also sucks and his points were surface level similar to PragerU's. Even though Charlie AFAIK doesn't watch PragerU, and was coming to his own conclusion. So it's the typical woke bullshit of painting someone I disagree with as a nazi/fascist/bad meanie doodoohead because I disagree with them and I hate this person now. Bad video 0/10.
i would say these channels that have popped up recently like "ethan is online" represent the final stage of breadtube, that is, completely substanceless outrage-porn. not that the OG breadtubers had much substance, it's just that they tried to put on a veneer of intellectual credibility. these types bank on you already buying into their premises uncritically because that's exactly what they've done. it's sort of like how the early pseudo-intellectual content of mid-2010s rational skeptic youtube would rise to vapid retards like no bullshit later on down the line. personally channels like these seem to me as a good sign, as they are signalling to me that breadtube as a force is devolving as echochamber ingroup bias sets in and as such their arguments will become weaker and weaker.
 
Last edited:
I have no idea if this "ethan is online" fag is part of Breadtube or not, but he has the hallmarks of a Breadtuber (Unwashed, gross looking, wire-frame glasses, fat, the video being way too fucking long, taking sponsorships from fucking Raycons even though he's a leftist or whatever), but this video came up in my recs. I watched it, it made me MATI and I wanna bitch about it.
I'm not an art historian by any means, I have few artists that I like (Magritte, Bosch, Escher, etc) but it's only something I have a cursory interest in. However, I guarantee I know more than this retard, who cherrypicks fucking PragerU for half of it talking about what they're saying is le bad and that they're fascist because... they just are okay?!? He tries to defend modern art in a very shitty and shallow way, the thing that damns his entire video the most to me is that he has to explain why the modern art he's defending via context of it, which to me, means it fails as art. Your reaction to art whether you like it or not doesn't depend on context at all. So having to explain away why pieces of modern art are not shitty and vacuous shows why they suck.
He then also tries to conflate Charlie aka Cr1tikal with being a PragerU fascist because he said that modern art also sucks and his points were surface level similar to PragerU's. Even though Charlie AFAIK doesn't watch PragerU, and was coming to his own conclusion. So it's the typical woke bullshit of painting someone I disagree with as a nazi/fascist/bad meanie doodoohead because I disagree with them and I hate this person now. Bad video 0/10.
New to this thread, so I'm not sure if anything I've said has been said before.
It's funny how this breadtuber, a fat white man who's obviously educated, feels the need to lecture people over a greenscreen about how dumb they are for not equating random splotches of paint on a canvas sold for money laundering purposes to a piece out of the Renaissance. He thinks he's clever for putting Critikal - a popular youtuber- on his thumbnail. Critikal's success is a reflection of the opinions of common people-- people who don't spend all day sniffing the farts of bourgeois academics and eventually indoctrine themselves into thinking condoning pedophilia or trooning out is beneficial to society. And I think most common people think that duct-taping bananas to a wall isn't art either.
I think people only think that breadtubers are smart because they talk like those overly verbose acamdemic essays that share no point other than to sound smart-- pseudointellectualism at its peak. Sorry if this comes across as a schizopost.
 
I wonder how long before BreadTube strokes their cocks to Trump getting arrested.

I have no idea if this "ethan is online" fag is part of Breadtube or not, but he has the hallmarks of a Breadtuber (Unwashed, gross looking, wire-frame glasses, fat, the video being way too fucking long, taking sponsorships from fucking Raycons even though he's a leftist or whatever), but this video came up in my recs. I watched it, it made me MATI and I wanna bitch about it.
I'm not an art historian by any means, I have few artists that I like (Magritte, Bosch, Escher, etc) but it's only something I have a cursory interest in. However, I guarantee I know more than this retard, who cherrypicks fucking PragerU for half of it talking about what they're saying is le bad and that they're fascist because... they just are okay?!? He tries to defend modern art in a very shitty and shallow way, the thing that damns his entire video the most to me is that he has to explain why the modern art he's defending via context of it, which to me, means it fails as art. Your reaction to art whether you like it or not doesn't depend on context at all. So having to explain away why pieces of modern art are not shitty and vacuous shows why they suck.
He then also tries to conflate Charlie aka Cr1tikal with being a PragerU fascist because he said that modern art also sucks and his points were surface level similar to PragerU's. Even though Charlie AFAIK doesn't watch PragerU, and was coming to his own conclusion. So it's the typical woke bullshit of painting someone I disagree with as a nazi/fascist/bad meanie doodoohead because I disagree with them and I hate this person now. Bad video 0/10.
I don't care if this guy's a BreadTuber, you have to have an IQ lower than the highest temperature in Alaska to defend Modern "Art".

Fredda seems like put of all the Breadtuber he seems determined to try and pick a war with people who just want to talk about historical events and make alt history scenarios. But like every other Breadtuber he is an insufferable loser.
Right, he already tried and failed to "deboonk" Pax Tube's video on the Crusades with logical fallacies. Leftists can't stand views of history outside their narrow view because then the Leftist view would be destroyed easily.
 
i would say these channels that have popped up recently like "ethan is online" represent the final stage of breadtube, that is, completely substanceless outrage-porn. not that the OG breadtubers had much substance, it's just that they tried to put on a veneer of intellectual credibility. these types bank on you already buying into their premises uncritically because that's exactly what they've done. it's sort of like how the early pseudo-intellectual content of mid-2010s rational skeptic youtube would rise to vapid retards like no bullshit later on down the line. personally channels like these seem to me as a good sign, as they are signalling to me that breadtube as a force is devolving as echochamber ingroup bias sets in and as such their arguments will become weaker and weaker.
You raised a good point, which I hadn't considered. One thing I noticed about breadtube a while ago, in school they teach you when debating you want to consider the potential arguments against your position and address them so your position seems more thought out. Breadtubers figured out they can cheekily sidestep this by acting like they already have considered the opposing arguments, and they are simply not even worth individually addressing, with time being better spent moving on to more important, bigger picture topics. This is exactly what he's doing when he vaguely mentions that people only hate "modern art" because they don't understand it, even saying he used to be ignorant like the rest of us until he went to a museum and became educated.

I assume this style of argument with its pompous self-assurance appeals to people who really want to join this project to convince everyone that conventional wisdom is dead and obsolete for whatever personal benefit they might get out of it. For everyone else it's just obnoxious and insulting, being told that all your ideas and beliefs, even about something as stupid and inconsequential as a banana taped to a wall is a reptile brained, visceral reaction to a thing you don't understand, or you've been programmed by society or the patriarchy, or you have internalized misogyny, etc. etc. etc. Contrapoints also does this in a video where he recounts a fleeting moment of disgust at seeing an ugly, non-passing trans person, with the same patronizing "I used to be like you" nonsense as this guy. Given this all just comes across as incompetent gaslighting meant to convince you you don't really believe the things you believe, your brain is just afraid so it defensively latches onto whatever makes sense so you become more willing to "deprogram" yourself, it's unsurprising that the audience for breadtube is shrinking to its most insular, hardline core.
 
I have no idea if this "ethan is online" fag is part of Breadtube or not, but he has the hallmarks of a Breadtuber (Unwashed, gross looking, wire-frame glasses, fat, the video being way too fucking long, taking sponsorships from fucking Raycons even though he's a leftist or whatever), but this video came up in my recs. I watched it, it made me MATI and I wanna bitch about it.
I'm not an art historian by any means, I have few artists that I like (Magritte, Bosch, Escher, etc) but it's only something I have a cursory interest in. However, I guarantee I know more than this retard, who cherrypicks fucking PragerU for half of it talking about what they're saying is le bad and that they're fascist because... they just are okay?!? He tries to defend modern art in a very shitty and shallow way, the thing that damns his entire video the most to me is that he has to explain why the modern art he's defending via context of it, which to me, means it fails as art. Your reaction to art whether you like it or not doesn't depend on context at all. So having to explain away why pieces of modern art are not shitty and vacuous shows why they suck.
He then also tries to conflate Charlie aka Cr1tikal with being a PragerU fascist because he said that modern art also sucks and his points were surface level similar to PragerU's. Even though Charlie AFAIK doesn't watch PragerU, and was coming to his own conclusion. So it's the typical woke bullshit of painting someone I disagree with as a nazi/fascist/bad meanie doodoohead because I disagree with them and I hate this person now. Bad video 0/10.
Harmful opinions did a solid breakdown on this. Peethans main argument seems to be the information about the art is more important to judge its quality than the actual art itself, thereby excluding skill required, accuracy, aestheticism and anything else. Its the shit social sciences argument which cant differentiate between a childs crayon scribbles and a professional piece in quality.
I can't believe no one has posted this yet.
BreadTube video essayist Noah Samsen makes paedophile accusations against a DGG streamer ChudLogic during the midst of a shit-flinging contest for completely unrelated.
View attachment 5283559

Someone asks him why he calls someone a pedo where it isn't applicable.
View attachment 5283561

Noah doubles down and looks like an even bigger idiot.
View attachment 5283564
(Archive)
The screenshot he provided clearly states the person on the other end is of legal age, so what's even the accusation here exactly?
View attachment 5283556

Also, HasanPiker liked tweet.
View attachment 5283566

The post was kept up until his entire account got nuked shortly thereafter.
View attachment 5283557
He shouldnt go around tossing pedo allegations with that stache especially when hes a manosphere creator who denounces violence.
 
I have no idea if this "ethan is online" fag is part of Breadtube or not, but he has the hallmarks of a Breadtuber (Unwashed, gross looking, wire-frame glasses, fat, the video being way too fucking long, taking sponsorships from fucking Raycons even though he's a leftist or whatever), but this video came up in my recs. I watched it, it made me MATI and I wanna bitch about it.
I'm not an art historian by any means, I have few artists that I like (Magritte, Bosch, Escher, etc) but it's only something I have a cursory interest in. However, I guarantee I know more than this retard, who cherrypicks fucking PragerU for half of it talking about what they're saying is le bad and that they're fascist because... they just are okay?!? He tries to defend modern art in a very shitty and shallow way, the thing that damns his entire video the most to me is that he has to explain why the modern art he's defending via context of it, which to me, means it fails as art. Your reaction to art whether you like it or not doesn't depend on context at all. So having to explain away why pieces of modern art are not shitty and vacuous shows why they suck.
He then also tries to conflate Charlie aka Cr1tikal with being a PragerU fascist because he said that modern art also sucks and his points were surface level similar to PragerU's. Even though Charlie AFAIK doesn't watch PragerU, and was coming to his own conclusion. So it's the typical woke bullshit of painting someone I disagree with as a nazi/fascist/bad meanie doodoohead because I disagree with them and I hate this person now. Bad video 0/10.
Look at the end of the day Kraut and Tea offered at least a more substantial defense of modern art. Pieces like "Eating ice cream with the assistance of the secret police"
Other works By OldrichKulhanek are pieces of modern art with meaning. Unironically Kraut and Tea offered a far better defense of modern art then any bread tuber. For those wondering his art pieces were protests of the Chezcslovakian authorities during the cold war.

Sadly I had to find a reupload of an old video.
 

Attachments

  • images (44).jpeg
    images (44).jpeg
    12.1 KB · Views: 94
  • Juxtapoz-OldrichKulhanek01.jpg
    Juxtapoz-OldrichKulhanek01.jpg
    50.3 KB · Views: 94
  • MV5BMGIwYTIwY2YtMTI2ZC00YThjLWIyMzgtYmJmOTExYTg5MjI2XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMDY3OTcyOQ@@._V1_FMjpg_UX1...jpg
    MV5BMGIwYTIwY2YtMTI2ZC00YThjLWIyMzgtYmJmOTExYTg5MjI2XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMDY3OTcyOQ@@._V1_FMjpg_UX1...jpg
    87.2 KB · Views: 91

I can't believe this faggot has given me a reason to watch The Big Bang Theory and possibly enjoy it from a new point of view. There isn't much to be said about the video because it's just him pulling up a bunch of clips from the show as "PROOF" and then saying "muh transphobia," but this guy has all the trappings of your typical tranny freak. Looks greasy and unwashed, has a cheap poster referencing communism/homosexuality/etc. hanging on a very unclean looking wall, obsesses over a dead show that was mostly mocked for it's cheesy writing and lack luster humor as if it was singlehandedly going to end the world, is named lily (The eternal rule of Lilith still holds true).

It will always amaze me how man children, such as this, think they ever deserve to be taken seriously. They're life is wrapped around a fantasy, that if ever even slightly criticized, will bring them to tears and toddler like temper tantrums. The comments for the video, as always, are a joy to read.
1693311721826.png

I'm sure everything this guy writes will be as funny as a rock hitting the ground.
1693311847926.png

This one just speaks for itself.
1693311957939.png

This is a weird way to spell "Keep sticking your girl dick into my mouth please!"
1693312077478.png

You're daughter will grow to resent and hate you, and she won't return your calls whenever she leaves the house.
1693312328246.png

ACK incoming [insert laugh track}.
 
Back