I hope heads roll for submitting utter crap in their line of duty but seeing as judges answer to no-one by design I severely doubt it.Don't give the 9th circuit any ideas... I can totally see one of their more activist members trying to issue an injunction against Trump for an "improperly motivated veto" when, much like this case:
A. The court has no jurisdiction to review Executive Veto, that power is granted by the Constitution, full stop, with no challenge to it available except Congressional override.
B. Within the framework of the courts, "Improperly Motivated" means nothing, it is not a legal term or even a legal concept, it's just someone's raw opinion. You might as well just say "The court finds that you are a doo-doo head".