Brianna Walker Wu / John Walker Flynt General Thread -
- Thread starter Jaimas
- Start date
I feel like October should belong to Wendingo Wu, but we haven't covered Miss'ippi John's military career have we?
Glad to see our obligatory daily/weekly mention of gubergaber, thanks John!
So hilarious John! Because everyone knows you're a super serious and super intelligent canidate who has rich and nuanced opinions about society's most pressing issues.
You know, like this, for example.
You know, like this, for example.
Has there ever been a flynt/jarbo victim fight club over gaymergate since they both are claiming to be patient zero?
Who is he kidding........he's always playing with semen.
John you ignorant fuck. The HRC was founded as a gay & lesbian rights org. Their focus was on raising campaign money for politicians who openly supported LGB rights and would push for anti-discrimination policies at the state and federal level. They also worked to defeat idiots like Jesse Helms who were actively opposing bills that would provide federal funding for AIDS research and treatment.
If anything the HRC was a relative latecomer to the gay marriage issue. They had no hand in Baehr v Lewin, one of the earlier challenges to states prohibiting same-sex marriage. HRC didn’t really even show up to the debate until after DOMA was passed in 1996.
No one demands the ASPCA build low-income housing for pet owners. That’s not their mission. The HRC wasn’t focused on troons because troons had fuck all to do with the first two decades of work done by the HRC. It wasn’t until the muckety-muck money men saw that they needed a new cause (once they knew Obergefell would pas) that y’all got to hijack the org.
Never mind burning witches, what about hunting down the ogres in our midst first
Unsurprisingly, John is wrong. There were all kinds of silly (to us) forms of evidence used in the Salem witch trials, but "testimony from Satan speaking to them from the demon world" was not one of them.
And even if they did, how does that invalidate Giuliani's point? The right to know and confront your accuser is one of the most bedrock-deep principles in American jurisprudence. You know who loves anonymous and unchallengeable accusations? Dictatorships and corrupt shitholes. And the Democrats in the House, apparently.
And even if they did, how does that invalidate Giuliani's point? The right to know and confront your accuser is one of the most bedrock-deep principles in American jurisprudence. You know who loves anonymous and unchallengeable accusations? Dictatorships and corrupt shitholes. And the Democrats in the House, apparently.
I thought the same thing. Is he remembering the Crucible? Does the Satan-as-witness thing happen in the play?
- Highlight
- #48,431
John is a very stupid person, with an idiot's command of general knowledge. If he remembers this "fact" from anywhere, it's probably a badly jumbled version of something that happened in a video game.
His ignorance of all things cannot be underestimated or understated.
No, that happens nowhere in The Crucible.
I believe that a random person on the street could list more horse facts than Wu can list actual facts about any of his interests.
Thank God we have John Flynt, PhD in computer science and voice of reason, to tell us that longer passwords are more secure than shorter ones.
If only Revolution 60 hadn't lost hundreds of thousands of dollars, to say nothing of the psychological costs of recruiting and firing vulnerable female employees after paying them $1.
If only Revolution 60 hadn't lost hundreds of thousands of dollars, to say nothing of the psychological costs of recruiting and firing vulnerable female employees after paying them $1.
As usual, John is full of shit https://keithieopia.com/post/2017-12-13-passwd-crack-time/
And that is assuming attacker already got an unsalted password hash.
And that is assuming attacker already got an unsalted password hash.
He may be on to something. malegenitals = 12 characters, femalegenitals = 14 thus he's more secure.
Also, why would the puritans, a devoutly religous sect accept testimony from Satan, the Father of Lies? This doesn't hold up to even a moment's idle thought, let alone serious scrutiny.
I truly don't know which is more appalling: John's historical illiteracy, John's complete theological ignorance, or John's handwaving away of inconvenient doctrines of jurisprudence.
I wonder if, in his garbled, synthetic hormone-and-Ambien-ravaged brain, he's thinking of the Devil's Advocate, the person who argues against the canonization of a candidate for Catholic sainthood.
"In Congress I'll fight to ensure our rights can't be taken away."
...says the Democrat who demands the Supreme Court override Congress every time the Republicans pass a bill.
There's 100+ years of scholarly thought on whether the Courts should override the legislature, how they should do it, and when they should be constrained. But there is less than 5 seconds' worth of thought in John's brain about how the branches should interact.