Brianna Walker Wu / John Walker Flynt General Thread -
- Thread starter Jaimas
- Start date
Did they screech a lot about mansplaining? Please tell me they did.
PFC A. Einstein, your services to this great nation will never be forgotten, nor the services of your 10,000k homosexual squad mates
I'd need to see the experiment, but unless they had four groups of cows (one painted black, one painted white, one unpainted, one striped) it wouldn't be very rigorous since the flies could merely be avoiding the paint.
Biting flies are an issue everywhere there are large mammals, it seems odd that they only developed stripes in Africa. Granted Tsetse flies would put a bit more pressure for change on a critter.
I love to see #Woke companies cucking under for actually abusively authoritarian regeimes.
Last edited:
Well there's a blast from the past, haven't seen Mississippi John in a while.
No. But she did have several striking similarities to John, including a falsified resume. She claimed to be an expert in several software applications that we used; in two of them she couldn't even open the program and create a new document.
It's the trannies, John. No one wants to hire trannies because they are insane.
The absolute highest quality journalism.
The absolute highest quality journalism.
Jesus christ you screeching tranny.
No one can be denied employment based on sex. Even if theyare a horse-piss injected closeted faggot, theycan't be denied employment based on sex because, guess what, "Male" is still a sex! They just don't get to claim unrepresented minority points because someone convinced them to cut off their cock.
What they can be denied is when a 6-foot bearded troon saddles into the ladies, they CAN be told to use the men's room or get fired for making the women uncomfortable when they try to capture audio of authentic female pissing sounds.
I feel like October should belong to Wendingo Wu, but we haven't covered Miss'ippi John's military career have we?
Glad to see our obligatory daily/weekly mention of gubergaber, thanks John!
So hilarious John! Because everyone knows you're a super serious and super intelligent canidate who has rich and nuanced opinions about society's most pressing issues.
You know, like this, for example.
You know, like this, for example.
Has there ever been a flynt/jarbo victim fight club over gaymergate since they both are claiming to be patient zero?
Who is he kidding........he's always playing with semen.
OttoWest
kiwifarms.net
John you ignorant fuck. The HRC was founded as a gay & lesbian rights org. Their focus was on raising campaign money for politicians who openly supported LGB rights and would push for anti-discrimination policies at the state and federal level. They also worked to defeat idiots like Jesse Helms who were actively opposing bills that would provide federal funding for AIDS research and treatment.
If anything the HRC was a relative latecomer to the gay marriage issue. They had no hand in Baehr v Lewin, one of the earlier challenges to states prohibiting same-sex marriage. HRC didn’t really even show up to the debate until after DOMA was passed in 1996.
No one demands the ASPCA build low-income housing for pet owners. That’s not their mission. The HRC wasn’t focused on troons because troons had fuck all to do with the first two decades of work done by the HRC. It wasn’t until the muckety-muck money men saw that they needed a new cause (once they knew Obergefell would pas) that y’all got to hijack the org.
Never mind burning witches, what about hunting down the ogres in our midst first
Unsurprisingly, John is wrong. There were all kinds of silly (to us) forms of evidence used in the Salem witch trials, but "testimony from Satan speaking to them from the demon world" was not one of them.
And even if they did, how does that invalidate Giuliani's point? The right to know and confront your accuser is one of the most bedrock-deep principles in American jurisprudence. You know who loves anonymous and unchallengeable accusations? Dictatorships and corrupt shitholes. And the Democrats in the House, apparently.
And even if they did, how does that invalidate Giuliani's point? The right to know and confront your accuser is one of the most bedrock-deep principles in American jurisprudence. You know who loves anonymous and unchallengeable accusations? Dictatorships and corrupt shitholes. And the Democrats in the House, apparently.
I thought the same thing. Is he remembering the Crucible? Does the Satan-as-witness thing happen in the play?
John is a very stupid person, with an idiot's command of general knowledge. If he remembers this "fact" from anywhere, it's probably a badly jumbled version of something that happened in a video game.
His ignorance of all things cannot be underestimated or understated.
No, that happens nowhere in The Crucible.