Can you be gay and be against gay marriage? -

[AF 802]

I think so. (t. gay)

Not in the sense of being hateful (or whatever else the social justice weirdos want to say it is), but that in legalizing it, you open up a Pandora's box for people to start demanding even more things, eventually leading to more extremities (such as right now).

 

[Bassomatic]

I have a set of gay friends whom are "married" in all sense of not having another person in life for 10 years almost and happy, but both against gay marriage for different reasons, one's more in the following of Rand Paul and thinks the gov shouldn't be part of marriage and won't marry anyone under that watch, the other is a bit more old fashioned and semi devout Christian and feels, it's for a family, they don't want to adopt and clearly can't have a kid so he sees it's not needed.

Now they both have good careers so health insure and signed for wills, medical issues etc, so it's as close as they can be.

 

[PlasticOwls]

Say what you will about marraige, but if a man and a woman can be miserable together, why not a man and a man?

Also marriage has a great set of legal benefits so why take that away from a couple?

 

[PorcupineTree]

I’ve thought about it too, mostly in regard to the dumbass polyamory shit Canada is doing right now.

The financial benefits outweigh that concern though.

 

[Jaiman]

You can't just not give people basic freedoms in fear that some faggots will try to take advantage of it. NAMBLA tried to take part in LGBT movements since the 90s, and pedos are still shunned by society.

 

[BoingBoingBoi]

there are classic libertarian arguments against it and against the institution of state-sanctioned marriage altogether, but that doesn't single out gay marriage really. a related point that i think milo actually made is about how the institution of marriage "domesticates" gays in a kind of negative way while a gay lifestyle is supposed to be more free and fun or whatever (i'm sure not all gays agree with this). or you might be gay but also find the institution of gay marriage to be an abomination for christian reasons and prefer to keep your sex life private.

 

[Draza]

Yes, it can also be alsp applied to straight people who are also against marriage.

 

[Snuckening]

Sure.

Milo Yiannopolisn or Log Cabin Republicans seem like the obvious eg's

You get whites saying anti-white shit, uncle ruckus-type blacks complaining about blacks, men who suppoŕted womens rights and women who opposed them. Probly all were minorities in their groups, but they existed

 

[PorcupineTree]

or you might be gay but also find the institution of gay marriage to be an abomination for christian reasons and prefer to keep your sex life private.

Are there any religious reasons a Christian with a same sex partner would oppose marriage? From what I understand, the church’s beef with homos is that it goes against the biblical definition of marriage. So even if you’re a legally married gay, you’d still be guilty of fornication in the eyes of God.

The morally correct thing to do from that perspective is either force yourself to marry straight or be celibate.

 

[Y2K Baby]

How about mentioning the fact that the Supreme Court ruling on gay marriage was unconstiutional and anyone saying that it wasn't bullshit judicial activism is a fucking retard?

You can't just not give people basic freedoms in fear that some faggots will try to take advantage of it. NAMBLA tried to take part in LGBT movements since the 90s, and pedos are still shunned by society.

Shut up, cuck.
"""""basic freedoms""""

 

[Draza]

Are there any religious reasons a Christian with a same sex partner would oppose marriage? From what I understand, the church’s beef with homos is that it goes against the biblical definition of marriage. So even if you’re a legally married gay, you’d still be guilty of fornication in the eyes of God.

The morally correct thing to do from that perspective is either force yourself to marry straight or be celibate.

Or don't get married.

 

[Clintonberg]

Sure. I'm gay and also staunchly against any basic human rights for other homosexuals.

dab

 

[Y2K Baby]

basic human rights

Your name fits you well, kike.

 

[AF 802]

NAMBLA tried to take part in LGBT movements since the 90s, and pedos are still shunned by society.

Unless you're on Tumblr, which unfortunately, that mentality is taking over slowly.

How about mentioning the fact that the Supreme Court ruling on gay marriage was unconstiutional and anyone saying that it wasn't bullshit judicial activism is a fucking exceptional individual?

tru that too

 

[PorcupineTree]

Or don't get married.

But that doesn’t fix the fornication issue.

How about mentioning the fact that the Supreme Court ruling on gay marriage was unconstiutional and anyone saying that it wasn't bullshit judicial activism is a fucking exceptional

Ok sure but of all the unconstitutional shit to complain about, I’m not going to choose the one that benefits a large group of people and harms nobody.

 

[Y2K Baby]

Ok sure but of all the unconstitutional shit to complain about, I’m not going to choose the one that benefits a large group of people and harms nobody.

It harms states' rights. And nobody cares.

Of all the things to override democracy for, we're stooping to fucking gay marriage because some dudes couldn't be buried together. It's especially heinous because it matters so little.

 

[PorcupineTree]

It harms states' rights.

Does it? I mean, would the world really be that different if that order wasn’t made?

If I was a super straight person I guess I might feel a little more scandalized, but in the rare event that I found a compatible wife, I would very much like to get married and adopt kids. My perspective is biased here.

 

[Y2K Baby]

Does it? I mean, would the world really be that different if that order wasn’t made?

If I was a super straight person I guess I might feel a little more scandalized, but in the rare event that I found a compatible wife, I would very much like to get married and adopt kids. My perspective is biased here.

Yes, because laws were overwritten to make it happen. It was an issue traditionally, (at the time of issuing it) recently, and consistently handled by indivdual states. (Parts of Alabama and Texas still don't have gay marriage because of the few institutions there that can validate marriages refuse to do it- wait until that's overriden too for the technicolor special interests groups.)

But fuck that, lolololol. Right side of history.

 

[wylfım]

Does it? I mean, would the world really be that different if that order wasn’t made?

If I was a super straight person I guess I might feel a little more scandalized, but in the rare event that I found a compatible wife, I would very much like to get married and adopt kids. My perspective is biased here.

Remember when California of all fucking places had a vote to make gay marriage illegal, and it passed by 52%?
Remember when a (faggot) judge overturned this with a very unbiased point of view for being "unconstitutional"?

 

[PorcupineTree]

Yes, because laws were overwritten to make it happen. It was an issue traditionally, (at the time of issuing it) recently, and consistently handled by indivdual states. (Parts of Alabama and Texas still don't have gay marriage because of the few institutions there that can validate marriages refuse to do it- wait until that's overriden too for the technicolor special interests groups.)

But fuck that, lolololol. Right side of history.

Ok that’s fair. I’m just an unpatriotic fag and don’t care enough lol. I have yet to see anything bad come of it. (outside of speculation)