Dramacow Caroline Farrow / CF_Farrow / CaroWithTheGoodHair / BlondPidge - Catholic priest fucker/Banned from the US for pissing off trannies on the internet/Slavishly supports the Catholic church/Drama queen/Emotional diarrhea

Status
Not open for further replies.

Real Mutha For Ya

puffing and blowing in your ear-hole
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Ok. Hate to ask this; but what the fuck is going on here in this thread?

I followed this thread from the start because I follow bits of terf Twitter (but don't really know any of the terf lore) and I'm lost.

Everyone is talking like everyone else is an alias of someone "known" (except the verifieds and that one mental bint who keeps spannering on about not wanting to be "dragged into Caroline's fantasy world" every other post.)

Then there's the weird new guy typing like a spaz refering to Caroline as "the cow" in some weird "how do you do fellow kids?" kind of way.

And now everyone is using this thread as their own personal handbags-at-dawn moment. Despite keeping half an eye on GC/TRA twitter, I've got literally no fucking clue what's going on, or who supposedly chucked sand in whoever-else's vagina. It's like walking in halfway through a season of GoT.

Could someone help a bitch out and give me a dramatis personea & synopsis for this thread??

(please?)
@Caroline Farrow is the verified lolcow.
@Joani Walsh is a freelance journalist who has covered trans issues.
Uncle Tony is a conman who claims he’s a Troon. In legal disputes with loads of TERFs including @Caroline Farrow and @Dr Louise Moody
Adrian “Gnasher” Yalland odd, Tory activist who has acted in a legal capacity for Farrow.
Joani hates Yalland because she believes Yalland sperged some details on the Farms about Uncle Tony.
@Real Mutha For Ya is claimed by @Mr Yalland of Counsel and Walshi to be Yalland.
@Notso jolly Halliday is claimed to be Farrow.
I suspect that @Mr Yalland of Counsel is Uncle Tony, but I don’t have the receipts. He’s certainly as deranged and psychotic as Tony but who gives a shit.
I am not Farrow or Yalland, but Troon mongs don’t believe it.
 

Real Mutha For Ya

puffing and blowing in your ear-hole
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Got any receipts for that? Thought not.

A verified freelance journalist has posted that you Jolly Wide Legs are Mother Superior? BTW what did you do with the money? @Joani Walsh is saying you bought a Mac?
Backacha! Why do you and @Joani Walsh think I am Yalland? Serious question.

And receipts for @Notso jolly Halliday being @Caroline Farrow?

I have admitted I have no proof that would hold up in court that you are Tony, except that you appear deranged and angry, and your posting style/Archive on Twitter, when you become uncontrollably demented, seems to match your insane sperging here.

uncletonybeingamong.PNG
 
Last edited:

Caroline Farrow

Bulwark of the Catholic Church in the UK
kiwifarms.net
I had thought about responding on the other thread about Joani's claims but it's not wise to do so. Also, when it comes to page 85, Real Mutha and NSJ are having a conversation at the same time myself and Adrian Yalland were in court. As anyone who was in court knows, neither of us were using devices. Adrian Yalland was addressing the judge. As for the rest of it. There's candy needs crushing.

A few points.

The Crowdfunder was set up in December 2018, a full 5 months before the claim was brought against me. The screenshot from the GoFundMe demonstrates that. It was set up by a Catholic friend of mine in response to the Tombstone Teeth website and the non-stop mobbing and harassment I get as a result of the advocacy I was doing on MSM and social media.

The purpose of the Crowdfunder was to enable me to have access to legal representation at all times, specifically in relation to a couple of persistent offenders including Tombstone Teeth. One of the mad posters on this thread posted a photograph of her daughter in the comments section of the Crowfunder to warn people that if they donated, then their money would go to harming this child. Another longstanding Twitter 'friend' saw who one of the donors was from the list and began Twitter bombarding and stalking them.

The majority of donors to the Crowdfunder were members of the Catholic community. There were two main donors (who I am not going to name) who together contributed to over 50% of the total. Catholic men. Not rad fems. Neither was the money given to me to stand up for free speech, but to help me secure legal representation, in response to first Tombstone Teeth, then Susie Green and finally the lawsuit. The majority of it was donated before the claim was issued.

My Mac is not a £3k MacBook Pro as Walsh claims, but a much cheaper MacBook Air. Bought with my income from journalism in order to enable me to take up my new job, in the middle of May after my last MacBook Air died. Coincidentally I bought it the day that the papers were served on me.

The receipts of the costs of getting legal representation for the injunction have been leaked. £10K. My crowdfunder raised £5K. Do the math.

In addition there was a bunch of court fees that I needed to pay. I had hoped to have surplus, which I was going to donate to Kate S if possible, after my employers, incensed by the situation, decided to campaign on my behalf, but I hadn't accounted for a bunch of outstanding invoices, after I changed my legal representation.

So it's not clear how I could have made any money from what happened and as someone with a media presence and platform, there was no need and certainly no intention to end up in a stressful lawsuit for clicks and likes. That's an insane idea. And there are much easier and assured ways to earn a few K .

It is not the Crowfunders which ought to scandalise people, but the fact that they are needed.

While everyone mocks me over being a mother of 5, like most parents, my children mean everything to me and are a huge driver in my life. At the end of the day, they deserved better than a constantly anxious, constantly strung-out and stressed-out mother, wondering where the next left-field accusation. was going to come from, having prison hanging over her and all of the peer pressure that comes with that, when she'd done nothing wrong.
 
Last edited:

Joani Walsh

TERF Journalist that hates Adrian Yalland
kiwifarms.net
I've responded to these points on the thread about me rather than derail this one.
I'm afraid I don't believe you. You've already argued there wasn't £10k+ in costs. Now the bills have emerged, you're agreeing there was. I've done the math. Your employers were covering your costs. That's exactly why you offered your crowdfunder elsewhere. Why would you have done that if the costs being covered didn't include the injunction?

The money only really started coming in as a result of the fight against Hayden - in order to fight Hayden. The funder had been limping along until then. Green withdrew as soon as the story came out so I'm not sure any came in to fight her. And if any came in to fight Tombstone Teeth then that is what you were obliged to do with it. Offering that money to someone else for another cause without checking with donors - particularly if outside RadFem Land - is unethical, too. Kind Catholics and RadFems aren't sugar daddies. These crowdfunders aren't personal treasure chests. In this case it is not the fact the crowdfunders are needed that's scandalous - in some cases they're not needed at all if people just stopped trying to achieve status and attract supply by declaring themselves the radfem Erin Brockovich; it is how radical feminists, many in parlous circumstances, are being used as cash cows that's scandalous.

Your computer is the same as mine. Mine cost more than £2k eight years ago. Keyboards are about £200, you have to pay for the mouse, too. Memory costs extra as does size of screen. They're expensive pieces of kit, used by journalists because they're what everyone in newsrooms use - because of design software. You said you were giving up any journalism gigs with the new job. It's incredibly badly paid anyway. I can't afford a Mac now and if I could I wouldn't be asking people to pay my legal bills.

As for the news NSJH was also posting at the same time as Real Mutha when Yalland and Farrow were both apparently otherwise engaged... well, that only increases the pointers to Mutha being Adrain. Although the embarrassing gotcha that went wrong - yet again - about Phat B being at court is probably the biggest clue after leaking correspondence to which he has no right.

Similarly, there are pointers to Stephs 6 Iron being Harry. Which is particularly saddening if it is. Shitposters just wouldn't have the insider knowledge that account does. It does seem also to pick out Scottow and I for particular rancour, both of us having stood up for a woman we felt had been treated badly. Some of the things it says sound like knowledge from conversations I've had with Harry. Sad if that is Harry. It seems so bitter.
 

Caroline Farrow

Bulwark of the Catholic Church in the UK
kiwifarms.net
In response to the further claims made on the other thread. It's mad. I am loathe to turn this into a dull slapfight for the lols but there's a number of wild allegations and accusations which Joani has chosen to put out publicly before actually doing any basic decent journalistic enquiry. I've put this into a spoiler in case anyone doesn't have better things to do with their time. Like disembowelling themselves with a blunt spoon.

First you said that the crowdfunder was set up to deal with the civil claim and when that was shown to be incorrect, you claimed that it was only a trickle up until that point. I have the receipts to demonstrate that over £4k was received by the start of January 2019. And that I did indeed seek legal advice over Tombstone Teeth and others and was given an estimate of costs. There was an influx of activity around the time of the Green case and indeed I have a screen grab of my friend who set up the Crowfunder promoting it on 23rd March, when the Green stuff was kicking off and before she dropped it. The civil claim didn't actually add more than a few hundred pounds to the total.

I provisionally offered any surplus in my crowdfunder elsewhere, in August, on the proviso and assumption that there would be a few K left. This was before a further court hearing in October and also before a number of legal bills came in, that I was personally responsible for, dating back to the injunction and a bunch of IT forensic work, court fees and admin fees. There was never any offer to pick up legal fees already incurred. The offer to fund my legal bills came 4 months after the original claim and after I'd been subject to attempts to have me put into prison. Do you really think £5k would cover all that work?

As for whether or not I checked with donors - I would have done prior to actually handing any funds over. I have actually spoken with the woman who set it up and who has communicated with the large donors who have indicated their consent for me to use the money however I want. The aim of the fund is self-explanatory: it was to defend me against (non-specified) legal issues, which started with Tombstone Teeth, but was not limited to them. Nowhere did I say, or represent this was the case, not least, because I did not set it up, it was set up to support me by two friends, not BY me.

When it comes to my MacBook Air - and I cannot believe that I am sat on KiwiFarms justifying my choice of work equipment, (which you claimed was for personal use) it was bought with my income, from a weekly column I write, from paid media appearances and from other employment, because my old MacBook Air from 2011, had fallen over and I was being quoted £800 for repair because the motherboard had died.

I bought it because it was easy to transfer all my files and data over from my old machine and because I needed a laptop to run various pieces of software for my new job. I don't care what yours cost. A MacBook Air does not currently cost anywhere £2k - check the Apple website, and neither did I need specific design software or memory otherwise I would have bought a Pro. I went to the Apple store (with my husband who is far more up on these things than I am) discussed what I needed and why and they recommended the Air as being the right machine for me. You don't need to buy an extra keyboard or mouse with a MacBook. They are an integral part of the hardware. Surely a journalist would know this.? I may not be doing journalism, but my job still involves being able to run various pieces of software and to use multimedia software and design packages. But why on earth should I even be having to justify this?

At the time the Crowdfunder was set up I was not earning brilliantly well and while I was trying to put aside some cash for a rainy day, didn't have thousands that I could just lavish on legal fees. Who does?

I bought my computer because I was starting a new job in 2 weeks time and needed it. I knew I would have the money from my first month's salary. I bought it from my own money, not the Crowdfunder, which went into an entirely separate account , on the day that the claim was issued against me in the High Court. Before any money came in from sympathetic rad fems to specifically fight the case. I have receipts which can account for every single penny which went on legal bills as expected.

This whole thing is making you look impervious to evidence. It's bonkers that you think that Adrian Yalland was stood-up, speaking to a judge, with the Claimant sat about 10 feet away while simultaneously and repeatedly posting on KiwiFarms. Don't you think the judge might have rightly told him off or someone in the court brought it to the judge's attention? He was sat 3 feet in front of me and my husband and was not on any kind of device, but taking hand-written notes, while I was having a meltdown because I was being informed that I was being reported to the police (once again) for being Real Mutha, who were supposedly coming to arrest me.
 
Last edited:

Joani Walsh

TERF Journalist that hates Adrian Yalland
kiwifarms.net
Caroline, sorry, I just can't be arsed wading through all that twisting and turning, I've been there too many times with you and Adrain and that way insanity lies. Neither of you will ever accept responsibility for anything you do, you'll even blame innocent parties as you're both doing right now on and off here trying to finger me for your fuckups. There's no point trying to obtain the truth from someone so desperate to hide it they spent from 9pm last night til three this morning editing their posts, even editing one to which I'd already responded. As I type, you're editing the post to which it is a response.

Neither is there any point in trying to obtain the truth from someone who has spent maybe ten years claiming victimhood and begging pity for the terrible impact on their family of so very, very many people who so weirdly seem to have it in for her and yet who risked everything posting on here as a sock. Who is currently in a tag team with her own sock.

I'll stick to what I know and can evidence. You called me to tell me your boss had offered to pay your bills so you were going to give your crowdfunder to Kate - it became pretty much dormant from that point yet tens of thousands was pouring into Shakatak's, Moody's and Scottow's. If the offer didn't include the bills that went before, the crowdfunder wouldn't have been free to pass on to someone else fighting the good fight and you'd have made sure to have been part of the largesse directed at the others in the same boat.

All this is doing is proving too many who have made themselves figureheads on this side of the debate display the very same characteristics of their counterparts on the other. Two accounts on here are trying to claim I'm a cokehead. There's a story doing the rounds I threw a charlie-fuelled party at my house - a RadFem snowdown. Only two women have stayed at my house, both of whom I put up so they could attend the same night out I'd organised for Fair Cop that went awry: Kate Scottow and Heather Brunskell-Evans. And I've never touched drugs. There won't be one witness to claim otherwise in or out of RadFem Land.

If that malevolent little fairy tale originated from the only night any RadFem has been to my house, the only people who knew about it were Fair Cop. I really hope that's not the source after what's being claimed about Harry and Scottow that hasn't been denied.
 

Caroline Farrow

Bulwark of the Catholic Church in the UK
kiwifarms.net
G K Chesterton on madness and arguing with a madman is sublime. I wonder if he would have been a lolcow?

And if great reasoners are often maniacal, it is equally true that maniacs are commonly great reasoners. When I was engaged in a controversy with the CLARION on the matter of free will, that able writer Mr. R.B.Suthers said that free will was lunacy, because it meant causeless actions, and the actions of a lunatic would be causeless. I do not dwell here upon the disastrous lapse in determinist logic. Obviously if any actions, even a lunatic's, can be causeless, determinism is done for. If the chain of causation can be broken for a madman, it can be broken for a man. But my purpose is to point out something more practical. It was natural, perhaps, that a modern Marxian Socialist should not know anything about free will. But it was certainly remarkable that a modern Marxian Socialist should not know anything about lunatics. Mr. Suthers evidently did not know anything about lunatics. The last thing that can be said of a lunatic is that his actions are causeless. If any human acts may loosely be called causeless, they are the minor acts of a healthy man; whistling as he walks; slashing the grass with a stick; kicking his heels or rubbing his hands. It is the happy man who does the useless things; the sick man is not strong enough to be idle. It is exactly such careless and causeless actions that the madman could never understand; for the madman (like the determinist) generally sees too much cause in everything. The madman would read a conspiratorial significance into those empty activities. He would think that the lopping of the grass was an attack on private property. He would think that the kicking of the heels was a signal to an accomplice. If the madman could for an instant become careless, he would become sane. Every one who has had the misfortune to talk with people in the heart or on the edge of mental disorder, knows that their most sinister quality is a horrible clarity of detail; a connecting of one thing with another in a map more elaborate than a maze. If you argue with a madman, it is extremely probable that you will get the worst of it; for in many ways his mind moves all the quicker for not being delayed by the things that go with good judgment. He is not hampered by a sense of humour or by charity, or by the dumb certainties of experience. He is the more logical for losing certain sane affections. Indeed, the common phrase for insanity is in this respect a misleading one. The madman is not the man who has lost his reason. The madman is the man who has lost everything except his reason.
 

LisaMuggeridge

kiwifarms.net
Ohhow fortunate. We have Joani. Joani while you are here, can I point something out to you. I know you are pretty thick and disgusting but I may as well.
''They apparently have to go through an official procedure and obtain authorisation. Rather than just logging on to Twitter and having a look. I confirmed it with Herts press office. Yet when I reported Lisa Muggeridge to the police checking her mental tweets seemed pretty routine. '' YOu appear to have been on the Charlie sweetheart. Just to clarify for you because you are a thick as shit fascist. A singlemother who doesnt use social media is not harassing you by saying she wont stand with a fascist. The police dont treat that as harassment cos everyone rejects a charlie snorting fascist. I am confused because the dates I have are this-
September 30th 2018, you tried exploiting child rape victims for Tommy Robinson and I said I dont stand with fascisrts who do that. I had @rdrake98 tell me on the 2nd October 2018 that I was 'being investigated for bullying Caroline Farrow'. Strangest thing was you already knew and Posie Parker knew what she was. You both did. You still do. You are the same as she is. A nuttier than squirrel shit fantasist fascist moron. A bottom feeder on social movements.
Now I know you are stupid and the charlie does leave holes in your already not very substantial brain- but you appear not to be delusional youa re malicious. Ad so is Mrs.Farrow. Somehow you have managed to conjure up in the two days between me saying I wouldnt stand with you ad you whipping up Mrs.Farrow, a delusion that I somehow harassed you/ Sweety, no sane person stands with a fascist. Because they hang around with people like Mrs.Farrow. You knew what Caroline was then you took part in what she does. That fear of rejection of yours, combined with the tendency to fantasy and the risk you pose to women is going to get you in trouble,. And it means you can only hang around with women like Farrow. A barometer for the mental. You knew what she was in NOvember 2018, you were happy to do what she does and you fabricated me doing taht to you because you are a coke head narcissist. You and Mrs.Farrow were friends because you enjoy harming women, its why other women wont stand with the far right or christian right. You and Posie ONLY liked Caroline because of what she is and how useful it was to harm women.

Just to clarify Ms.Walsh- there wasnt even a digital device in my house in the period after I told you I would NEVER stand with a fascist. The two days it took you to whip up Mrs.Farrow, were not me harassing you. I was rejecting you. You already know noone will stand with a fascist and why, and doing that really only leads here. THank you for demonstrating why no sane person stands with fascist and thank you very much to you and Mrs.Farrow for the demonstration on this trhead.

Oh and Joani before ypou come back with your narc rage. Neither I nor anyone else gives a flying fuck what a coke snorting narcissistic fascist thinks. Its not like you are a journalist is it sweetheart? Its why you have to bottom feed social movements and need friends who will do what MrsFarrow will do to children and women. Bless, you share the dysfunction of trans rights activists and liked having them for cover. A freak fascist trapped in her own destructive patterns with lunatics like Farrow. Eugh. Stick to Kiwifarms love. Shit as the police are they dont treat someone saying they wont stand with a fascist as harassment, and you really shouldnt be making such blatant fabrications up if you want to pretend you are a journalist. Not that anyone was ever convinced of that.

Mrs.Farrow, your response to my posts was not welcome and it appears I am quite ill and may need to protect the final months of mylife by prosecuting you. So you might want to think again about unwanted contact with me, soliciting third parties to defame me, and generating risk of violence and harm for my daughter, using media organisations, generating risk of violence?. If a private prosecutiin necessary so that I can protect my final months from you, after THAT ten year campaign, with so many other victims is a prison sentence. But am sure you've been advised of that. I have had no voluntary contact with you since 2010.
 
Last edited:

Real Mutha For Ya

puffing and blowing in your ear-hole
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Is this the reason so many posts critical of Farrow are being hidden?View attachment 1279111
Perhaps it’s because you’re a boring, cokehead, fuckwitted mong.
You do realise that after sperging here no one will ever take you seriously again as a “journalist”. You have destroyed whatever career you ever had. You can’t write; your critical faculties are fucked; your judgement is shot to pieces and you are as tedious as fuck.
journalists are supposed to protect their sources. Do you think anyone will trust you now after you have divulged private correspondence? You are disgrace.
Oh, by the way, what colour knickers are you wearing?
 
Last edited:

Joani Walsh

TERF Journalist that hates Adrian Yalland
kiwifarms.net
Perhaps it’s because you’re a boring, cokehead, fuckwitted mong.
You do realise that after sperging here no one will ever take you seriously again as a “journalist”. You have destroyed whatever career you ever had. You can’t write; your critical faculties are fucked; your judgement is shot to pieces and you are as tedious as fuck.
journalists are supposed to protect their sources. Do you think anyone will trust you now after you have divulged private correspondence? You are disgrace.
Oh, by the way, what colour knickers are you wearing?
23FC6AFF-A7D0-4D13-9BE6-320EDE14DC36.jpeg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Dumb
Reactions: TheBlackVolga

Real Mutha For Ya

puffing and blowing in your ear-hole
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
It’s ironic for someone who has issues with the batshit end of TERFery to invoke #MeToo when Gnasher Yalland makes a clumsy pass.
If he did assault you then you should go to the police. At least we would have receipts to back up your WhatsApp spergery.
Stop projecting Yalland’s idiotic behaviour on someone who had the misfortune to engage him.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: trannyfucker

Joani Walsh

TERF Journalist that hates Adrian Yalland
kiwifarms.net
It’s ironic for someone who has issues with the batshit end of TERFery to invoke #MeToo when Gnasher Yalland makes a clumsy pass.
If he did assault you then you should go to the police. At least we would have receipts to back up your WhatsApp spergery.
Stop projecting Yalland’s idiotic behaviour on someone who had the misfortune to engage him.
It's ironic that Kiwi Farms is now worse than Mumsnet for censoring comments it doesn't like.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.