Castaigne2 said:I just have low tolerance for bullshit - whether that be yours or anyone else's - and I lack fear of violence or death. So, if the Kiwis decide to dox the fuck out of me, I give no shits, unlike you. Now, when they start shooting at me, I'll start shooting back, but I frankly think they don't have the stones to assassinate people. Frankly, I'm surprised that when you got doxxed that you didn't get some of your Hamas bros to go allahu-akbar on 'em. I would have. But to each their own.
So what does everyone here do when they look around IRL and have a strong temptation to just say "Fuck it." and stride off penniless into the world, abandoning all responsibility, all attachments, and severing every tie with everyone you ever knew? (Or similar; I doubt everyone here has the same reactions I do to life's little irritations.) --Castaigne (talk) 01:10, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
I ask for these because Brianna Wu hasn't identified herself as such, and so therefore I do not know for a fact that she is transgender.
2) Try to deny it as you will, Jace Connors self-identifies as a GamerGater and I consider his stalking trip to be an "act of violence". And no, don't try to deny him - GamerGate has no leaders, no structure, anyone who claims Gatorhood is part of it. Y'all left that membership '''WIDE''' open. Hell, I can be a GamerGater if I want! All I have to do is announce it!
There is always room for hope for homosexuals? How naive of science you are. I had myself sterilized at the age of 22. My wife was sterilized before we married. It would be impossible for us to bear children and we knew before we married that we would never adopt. There are zerochances of us having children, and we knew that before marriage - thus invalidating your statement that there is always room for hope for heterosexuals.
Furthermore, we didn't get married in a church, just before a judge. While I was raised Catholic, my wife is a 3rd-generation atheist. And the onlyreason we married was to secure the rights of inheritance, the rights of medical determination for the spouse, and the other 1000+ federally provided benefits of marriage.
Before you suggest that we should have gotten a civil union, I remind you that civil unions are legally inferior and subject to disruption by a blood relative, especially in the case of inheritance. Marriage would not protect my wife from having the will nullified by my rapacious uncles who seek my wealth. --Castaigne (talk) 14:26, 4 June 2015 (UTC)