POV: you're a failure of a normal human being
Charles Alexander Berry / Buck Daniel Riley / Toggle the Rat / @onebiggrumpyrat / ExitMouse / Smoochthispooch / huskeyindenial / clunkymunk - Doug Spink's little animal rapist friend
- Thread starter s0mbra
- Start date
-
Sustained Denial of Service attacks. Paid for botnet. Service will continue to be disrupted until I can contact other providers and arrange a fix. Sister services to the forum will have longer downtime. There's still ongoing service-level attacks which are causing intermittent errors and general slowness.
Trash Cans
kiwifarms.net
It feels like Youtube's going down another slippery slope. If advertisers catch word of the fact that this stuff is still on YouTube there could be another Adpocalypse. I feel like if I worked at YouTube I'd be at least aware of how close they're teetering to the line yet again.
Youtube having a couple dozen animal abuse/fake rescue vids and one known zoofag podcast wouldn't fuck their entire system because, unlike with Elsagate, most of the people viewing the videos aren't random unsupervised children who are too young to understand what a report feature is. A huge part of the reason why Elsagate became such a big thing and why it triggered the Adpocalopse was because there were literally thousands and thousands of channels built around exploiting the algorithm in order to expose kids to disgusting clickbait due to a complete lack of oversight on Youtube's side, but also no adequate supervision from the white suburban moms who couldn't be bothered to actually check what their kids were doing on a website that had a very open "extreme violence and porn isn't allowed; profanity, cartoon violence and suggestive content is fine though" policy until after they had already ingested a few Elsa and Spiderman pregnant kidnap needle videos.
Animal vids are a bit different and I can sort of see why Youtube ignores most reports even when they're valid, given that every single video featuring an animal in it somewhere has at least five angry comments from complete morons saying shit like, "Don't breathe so hard on that turtle, you're hurting it!" and spam-report out of spite when other people tell them to shut the fuck up. If anything I would imagine that their report system for animal abuse is constantly overloaded from people with no common sense getting angry that someone dared to feed their dog cooked chicken on camera, which makes it very hard to take full-blown animal abuse or more subtle animal exploitation videos seriously; especially if Youtube is doing it via automated system in some way, because if 95% of animal abuse report tickets are bogus then it's very likely that any algorithm in place would start defaulting to all animal abuse tickets being false based on highest likelihood.
Any leads on the three other mice molesters in this thumbnail? I can only imagine the kind of person that would gladly talk to Toggle about the sociopolitical effects of fucking a snake for 2 hours...actually scratch that, Ashley Zoe Fox punches that ticket.
TLDR: who are the tards, I'm not prepared for 2 hours in the toggle-sphere.
ApplesOnTop
kiwifarms.net
Until the zoophiles take a stance of decapitating zoosadists on sight, they can't say shit about how they're better than zoosadists.
This is not an encouragement to commit crime, it's just a statement on what standpoint zoophiles would have to take before I'd be willing to listen to their bullshit "ethics" lessons.
Cranky Hermit
kiwifarms.net
Seriously. The "brave and unrelenting" response to zoosadists from zoophiles... was to nudge them and whisper "knock it off." Not only because these people would immediately roll on them to get a plea deal but because the zoosadists were some of the most prolific producers of "regular" bestiality porn out there. I mean, they couldn't jeopardize their precious sources of animal rape porn, could they?
By the by, after getting outed, Toggle created another alt for Zooier than Thou.
If you fuck a dog, you're a zoosadist. Having sex with animals is in itself abuse.
If you want to fuck any tangible, living thing other than another human you're an actual idiot who needs to seek help in general. Frankly, the fact they think they need to make some sort of distinction between the two of them just goes to show how deluded they are. It's like the difference between a date rapist and the guy pinning someone down in an alleyway, one might be less violent than the other but the end result is still rape.
I had to read the phrase "Gay Rat Tummy". I really shouldn't be surprised at the kind of selective thinking these people do, but it still kind of confuses me just how much they're willing to ignore just to avoid the fact that they're fucked in the head. Surely ego can only go so far with them? Then again, judging from the sorts of lives these people tend to lead screwing sea biscuit may be the only thing they actually have.
We get it Charles. You like fucking animals. He really thinks this is either funny or cute, probably both. But it's just degenerate cringe.
Stupidface
kiwifarms.net
Had the displeasure of being reminded Charlie is very much alive, and happens to be turning 32 today. Despite holding a BA, he continues to do nothing with his life, wallow in filth, and make society an objectively worse place.
Archive
Raping animals is absolutely fine but eating them is where we draw the line, remember!
Archive
Raping animals is absolutely fine but eating them is where we draw the line, remember!
Donutcapybara
kiwifarms.net
That's it. ı'm done,furries need to be gassed.
![[n i h i l i s m]](http://no-cookie.kiwifarms.net/data/avatars/l/49/49249.jpg?1621767910){kind=avatar}
I'm not sure if anyone has linked it here, but there was a study a few years back in which 7000+ furries were surveyed. Approximately 18.4% of them self identified as zoophiles. So, statistically speaking, about 1 in every 5 furries you see is a dogfucker. A stat that will surprise noone.
Then you've got people like Toggle and his zoo crew tying to normalize it. The greater majority of furries turn a blind eye. They could have just as easily gone full twitter mob and rejected Toggle and his dogfucker friends, but furries never want to invalidate one another because "muh uwu safe space".
TL;DR Furries need to be gassed.
Then you've got people like Toggle and his zoo crew tying to normalize it. The greater majority of furries turn a blind eye. They could have just as easily gone full twitter mob and rejected Toggle and his dogfucker friends, but furries never want to invalidate one another because "muh uwu safe space".
TL;DR Furries need to be gassed.
Having dug around Usenet archives for ancient furry artifacts on the really old furs a few times and knowing a few furfags who have me dog up dirt on other furfags for black mail (though what furries find blackmail worthy is weird) I think the silence is more than silent acceptance and more systematic. Speaking out seems to always draw the ire of someone with power. Con organizers, site admins, reddit moderators, zine organizers, major artists, fur suit makers, etc c..
Someone always brings down the hammer if you speak out against anything at all. Talk about people shitting in public at the con being inappropriate? Your favourite artist won't do your commissions anymore. Tell pedos to go throw themselves in a volcano? That con you were going to next weekend just banned you. Complain about minimum wage not being enough to live off of and having to work 100+ hour weeks to live? Suddenly you're banned from FA.
These are all real examples I've seen over the years. They've just sort of bullied themselves into compliance. This has lead to a out of control growth of degeneracy. Zoophiles seem to have the biggest issue getting this protection though. The way they get it is a bit more insidious, they actively network and work to get each other into positions of authority so they can co-opt non-zoophile spaces to make them zoophile friendly.
andy panda
kiwifarms.net
That survey of 7000 from 2008 also compares to over a million active Furaffinity accounts. The official presence of zoophiles is online and you'll get concentrated response from them. Furries are spread out across innumerable sub-fandoms, wouldn't reply to a survey and don't have to lead sick sad existences based on apologetics for fucking dogs. A lot of them do anyways, but you get the point. So do a lot of not-furries, like the famous Kinsey report found 8% of men did bestiality and approaching half of them raised on farms did. All I'm saying is, constructing skewed data is easy but so is finding 1191 bullets for humans who shouldn't be molesting animals and trying to normalize it. Please keep Charles/Toggle at the front of the line.
Last edited:
Charles is shocked to find out not every gay person is a disgusting degenerate like he is:
Yes, gay people are aware of the similar verses about homosexuality. Times have changed and so has the church's stance on homosexuality so that's not at all that hypocritical Charles. Faggots, the Church, and your average sane person all agree that having sex with animals is an abomination and deviancy that nobody will tolerate. He's kind of on his own little island with this one.
Leviticus 18:23
And you shall not lie with any animal and so make yourself unclean with it, neither shall any woman give herself to an animal to lie with it: it is perversion.Leviticus 20:15-16
If a man lies with an animal, he shall surely be put to death, and you shall kill the animal. If a woman approaches any animal and lies with it, you shall kill the woman and the animal; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them.Yes, gay people are aware of the similar verses about homosexuality. Times have changed and so has the church's stance on homosexuality so that's not at all that hypocritical Charles. Faggots, the Church, and your average sane person all agree that having sex with animals is an abomination and deviancy that nobody will tolerate. He's kind of on his own little island with this one.
I dunno what sorta "gotcha" he's trying to pull here. Just because the Bible condemns gay people too doesn't mean that the quoted text is any less wrong.
The delusions from this man are too plenty to count, jfc.
Dunno what's worse, the fact he probably has put lipstick on his dog Buffalo Bill style to make out with it or that he parodied Katy Perry basically invalidating his ability to say he was ever involved with music.
Kind of the issue with pegging down a trend for something as admittedly broad as the furry fandom is, it's so massive that it kind of splinters off into smaller and smaller niches that can number into the tens of thousands on their own. However, it's hard to deny that a.) the fandom, in general, is far far too accepting of zoophiles and zoo content, and b.) there's arguably a culture in the fandom of enabling this sort of extreme degeneracy (for as head tilting as a neon wolf with three cocks and nipples larger than his head is, it's at least removed enough from a real animal to be construed as such) because of an impulse to be 'tolerant and accepting' to a frankly absurd degree.
My spergy rambling aside, yes keep the rat fucker near the front
Part of me thinks that he knows on some level that what he's doing is sick and abusive but he's so dead set on making this mental illness a lifestyle that he scrounges for any sort of defense he can possibly muster. With alphabet month here expect ungodly amounts of zoosexual pride
Catboi
kiwifarms.net
Lipstick means dog cock,
Charles had his "therapist" listen to his podcast (probably for validation and acknowledgement):
Apparently his unethical quack of a "therapist" agreed to go on his podcast. There goes all of their credibility, what little they had left.
Apparently his unethical quack of a "therapist" agreed to go on his podcast. There goes all of their credibility, what little they had left.
Similar threads
Twice convicted pedophile. Mad about his shitty 10yo suit + being a registered sex offender
- Sticky
Because you can't have a couple thousand dog fucking enthusiasts under the same roof without shit hitting the fan
