FursuitSerialKiller
kiwifarms.net
Example
Charles Alexander Berry / Buck Daniel Riley / Toggle the Rat / @onebiggrumpyrat / ExitMouse / Smoochthispooch / huskeyindenial / clunkymunk - Doug Spink's little animal rapist friend
- Thread starter s0mbra
- Start date
-
Sustained Denial of Service attacks. Paid for botnet. Service will continue to be disrupted until I can contact other providers and arrange a fix. Sister services to the forum will have longer downtime. There's still ongoing service-level attacks which are causing intermittent errors and general slowness.
Stupidface
kiwifarms.net
It's my understanding Miletski isn't his therapist but the bridge he used to find one who would tell him everything he does is acceptable. She's constantly recommended by him and other zoophiles for therapist referral.
Though, wouldn't shock me if he had used her as a resource before his advocacy for animal rape; he has a known incest fetish (albeit, gay) and she wrote an entire shitty book on mother-son relations.
Regardless,
what benefit does having a sexologist on the podcast create? Miletski knows absolutely nothing about animal welfare, with no accreditation or otherwise on the subject. She really went to lengths in her (not peer-reviewed) zoophilia book to imply zoophiles deserve to be treated as "misunderstood" all while giving them a spotlight to continue insisting it's somehow ethical.
So he's essentially just hosting an ass-kisser who doesn't care to understand the ethical issues of zoophilia, in the guise of her being credible to speak on it as a "valid sexuality". When will they talk to literally anyone who understands animal welfare and is credible in a relevant field? Never, because they won't support the mythical idea of "raping animals is fine".
Edit to include the podcast featuring Miletski. 01:54:19 to 02:41:41 for her specifically.
Of note, roughly 02:00:00 to 02:02:00, she declares most bestiality is not abusive to the animal since zoophiles love them so much, despite her aforementioned lack of knowledge in animal welfare. How heartwarming.
Last edited:
that is the most. Scariest. Fucking. Thing
Stupidface
kiwifarms.net
It only gets worse.
And yes, Charles' character and the other freak are nude as well.
Lovecat is a middle-aged man, but this is his character.
They're all awful. It really provides an uncanny valley effect, especially with the eyes and feet?
Silver lining: At least he knows he has a tiny embarrassing cock and doesn't hide it on his fursona.
If you have to ask that question you probably don't belong in this conversation in the least bit.
The proportions are all weird, not just in the faces and eyes but the length of the bones and the shapes of the ribs or pelvis. It's terrible art, misshapen and deformed, repulsive even.
It suits the subjects perfectly.
You forgot the yellow nails and teeth.
Him posting naked drawings of a dog tranny in heels and a cat cuntboy with a side of giant rat ball sack is pretty tame as far as zoophile shit obviously, but in the YouTube thumbnail you can tell the characters are naked too. The dog penis is just barely covered by the cat's hand. It's like sneaky and blatantly degenerate at the same time. All while they're demanding to be taken seriously about their "legitimate sexuality" on their "educational" podcast.
Stupidface
kiwifarms.net
If Charles was sure YouTube wouldn't shit itself over the art, I have the distinct feeling there'd be no attempt at this mild censorship. I mean, the topics of discussion are frequently and blatantly NSFW while having a disgusting amount of detail more often than not.
I think I just got aids from looking at those
There are different breeds (ha) of furry/zoo NSFW art horrors. Some consumers want fur art to look more human than anything else - including human-like proportions and genitals - just with paws and tails and cartoony animal heads. These people are degenerate enough already. But the further along you get on the spectrum of furfaggotry <----> zoophilia, the more "realistic" the genitals will be.
No doubt Toggle wanted to be true to real rats (who do indeed have proportionally massive balls).
round robin
kiwifarms.net
I would be very interested in finding out who his therapist is. I think some people in the Memphis area deserve to know that their shrink supports dog diddling.
Stupidface
kiwifarms.net
Whoever Miletski referred Charles to would be in AASECT. Have fun.
They're not local. He found some internet quack.
A rapist can tell you they love you one million times while dick deep in you/you cunt deep in them and it doesn't make it anything more than a perverted disgusting lie, fuckface. Like abusive spouses who beat their partners then apologize or pedos who corrupt children into sex, but I wouldn't expect her to be empathetic enough to understand such a complex concept of not fucking your dog.
Charles got to get as close to fucking a kangaroo as he'll ever get in his life. He clearly didn't wash his hair for his date with the infant kangaroo.
oh that poor baby roo, if only it knew
Sharklaser
kiwifarms.net
Too bad he didn't try to rape a saltwater croc while he was here.
Similar threads
Twice convicted pedophile. Mad about his shitty 10yo suit + being a registered sex offender
- Sticky
Because you can't have a couple thousand dog fucking enthusiasts under the same roof without shit hitting the fan
