Charles Alexander Berry / Buck Daniel Riley / Toggle the Rat / @onebiggrumpyrat / ExitMouse / Smoochthispooch / huskeyindenial / clunkymunk - Doug Spink's little animal rapist friend

FursuitSerialKiller

kiwifarms.net

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20200514-073759_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20200514-073759_Chrome.jpg
    221.8 KB · Views: 107

Stupidface

kiwifarms.net
Apparently his unethical quack of a "therapist" agreed to go on his podcast. There goes all of their credibility, what little they had left.

View attachment 2231403
It's my understanding Miletski isn't his therapist but the bridge he used to find one who would tell him everything he does is acceptable. She's constantly recommended by him and other zoophiles for therapist referral.
Though, wouldn't shock me if he had used her as a resource before his advocacy for animal rape; he has a known incest fetish (albeit, gay) and she wrote an entire shitty book on mother-son relations.

Regardless,
what benefit does having a sexologist on the podcast create? Miletski knows absolutely nothing about animal welfare, with no accreditation or otherwise on the subject. She really went to lengths in her (not peer-reviewed) zoophilia book to imply zoophiles deserve to be treated as "misunderstood" all while giving them a spotlight to continue insisting it's somehow ethical.
Screenshot_20210604-165423_Messenger.png

So he's essentially just hosting an ass-kisser who doesn't care to understand the ethical issues of zoophilia, in the guise of her being credible to speak on it as a "valid sexuality". When will they talk to literally anyone who understands animal welfare and is credible in a relevant field? Never, because they won't support the mythical idea of "raping animals is fine".


Edit to include the podcast featuring Miletski. 01:54:19 to 02:41:41 for her specifically.

Of note, roughly 02:00:00 to 02:02:00, she declares most bestiality is not abusive to the animal since zoophiles love them so much, despite her aforementioned lack of knowledge in animal welfare. How heartwarming.
 
Last edited:

Stupidface

kiwifarms.net
that is the most. Scariest. Fucking. Thing

View attachment 2239111
It only gets worse.
imageedit_1_4231781886.png

Of course it's a tranny.

And yes, Charles' character and the other freak are nude as well.
Lovecat is a middle-aged man, but this is his character.
imageedit_5_5310750932.png


imageedit_7_8991230138.png

They're all awful. It really provides an uncanny valley effect, especially with the eyes and feet?
 

RoboticRichardSimmons

Robotic Weight Saint
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
It only gets worse.
View attachment 2240865
Of course it's a tranny.

And yes, Charles' character and the other freak are nude as well.
Lovecat is a middle-aged man, but this is his character.
View attachment 2240866

View attachment 2240868

They're all awful. It really provides an uncanny valley effect, especially with the eyes and feet?
Silver lining: At least he knows he has a tiny embarrassing cock and doesn't hide it on his fursona.
 

Ramona

all out of lean cuisines
kiwifarms.net
If you have to ask that question you probably don't belong in this conversation in the least bit.
Him posting naked drawings of a dog tranny in heels and a cat cuntboy with a side of giant rat ball sack is pretty tame as far as zoophile shit obviously, but in the YouTube thumbnail you can tell the characters are naked too. The dog penis is just barely covered by the cat's hand. It's like sneaky and blatantly degenerate at the same time. All while they're demanding to be taken seriously about their "legitimate sexuality" on their "educational" podcast.
 

Stupidface

kiwifarms.net
It's like sneaky and blatantly degenerate at the same time. All while they're demanding to be taken seriously about their "legitimate sexuality" on their "educational" podcast.
If Charles was sure YouTube wouldn't shit itself over the art, I have the distinct feeling there'd be no attempt at this mild censorship. I mean, the topics of discussion are frequently and blatantly NSFW while having a disgusting amount of detail more often than not.
 

B1 Commander

roger roger
kiwifarms.net

GenitalFetishist

Send duck pics plz
kiwifarms.net
The rat has giant balls

There are different breeds (ha) of furry/zoo NSFW art horrors. Some consumers want fur art to look more human than anything else - including human-like proportions and genitals - just with paws and tails and cartoony animal heads. These people are degenerate enough already. But the further along you get on the spectrum of furfaggotry <----> zoophilia, the more "realistic" the genitals will be.

No doubt Toggle wanted to be true to real rats (who do indeed have proportionally massive balls).
 

round robin

kiwifarms.net
Charles had his "therapist" listen to his podcast (probably for validation and acknowledgement):

View attachment 2231402

Apparently his unethical quack of a "therapist" agreed to go on his podcast. There goes all of their credibility, what little they had left.

View attachment 2231403
I would be very interested in finding out who his therapist is. I think some people in the Memphis area deserve to know that their shrink supports dog diddling.
 

keyboredsm4shthe2nd

Youscatgetouttahereg-go-gogetthestick-getouttahere
kiwifarms.net
It's my understanding Miletski isn't his therapist but the bridge he used to find one who would tell him everything he does is acceptable. She's constantly recommended by him and other zoophiles for therapist referral.
Though, wouldn't shock me if he had used her as a resource before his advocacy for animal rape; he has a known incest fetish (albeit, gay) and she wrote an entire shitty book on mother-son relations.

Regardless,
what benefit does having a sexologist on the podcast create? Miletski knows absolutely nothing about animal welfare, with no accreditation or otherwise on the subject. She really went to lengths in her (not peer-reviewed) zoophilia book to imply zoophiles deserve to be treated as "misunderstood" all while giving them a spotlight to continue insisting it's somehow ethical.

So he's essentially just hosting an ass-kisser who doesn't care to understand the ethical issues of zoophilia, in the guise of her being credible to speak on it as a "valid sexuality". When will they talk to literally anyone who understands animal welfare and is credible in a relevant field? Never, because they won't support the mythical idea of "raping animals is fine".


Edit to include the podcast featuring Miletski. 01:54:19 to 02:41:41 for her specifically.
View attachment 2231696
Of note, roughly 02:00:00 to 02:02:00, she declares most bestiality is not abusive to the animal since zoophiles love them so much, despite her aforementioned lack of knowledge in animal welfare. How heartwarming.
A rapist can tell you they love you one million times while dick deep in you/you cunt deep in them and it doesn't make it anything more than a perverted disgusting lie, fuckface. Like abusive spouses who beat their partners then apologize or pedos who corrupt children into sex, but I wouldn't expect her to be empathetic enough to understand such a complex concept of not fucking your dog.
 

Similar threads

Twice convicted pedophile. Mad about his shitty 10yo suit + being a registered sex offender
Replies
161
Views
34K
  • Sticky
Because you can't have a couple thousand dog fucking enthusiasts under the same roof without shit hitting the fan
Replies
813
Views
208K
Artcow Ken Penders
Former Archie Sonic Comic Writer/Artist
Replies
1K
Views
316K
Top