I agree. I think Rani may have been the only person who legitimately gave a shit about Chloe.Rani was actually romantically involved with Chloe, and actually did care about her, so I think she can have that one.
I agree. I think Rani may have been the only person who legitimately gave a shit about Chloe.Rani was actually romantically involved with Chloe, and actually did care about her, so I think she can have that one.
Yeah, it seems like she's not trying to blame the farms, more the people around her/online circles, the ones who actually did affect her MH.Please don't lock the thread, there's still grifters and assholes trotting out their name to add weight to whatever bullshit they want to peddle online:
View attachment 1963722
View attachment 1963737
Agree, but it's a very clumsy and suspicious piece of public grief to be posting 2 years later.Rani was actually romantically involved with Chloe, and actually did care about her, so I think she can have that one.
Why? Is she supposed to just never mention her again? I'm sure it was an absolutely central event in her mind's landscape, and how can you just move past something like that?Agree, but it's a very clumsy and suspicious piece of public grief to be posting 2 years later.
Just the little details, to me; her 2018 tweets about Sagal(when they were already separated) post-immolation were toned as though "I don't want to be in the spotlight for this, please get facts right and move on, don't make Chloe a circus," and seemed genuine then. I have a hard time identifying with the need to social media-mention someone who's been dead 2+ years out of the blue, several times. But I'm also not a Portland tranny begging for work/bills on twitter, so it may just be out of my headspace to imagine.Why? Is she supposed to just never mention her again? I'm sure it was an absolutely central event in her mind's landscape, and how can you just move past something like that?
I think one of the most telling things to do during this time to gauge intent is to see what certain people did in the aftermath of Chloe's suicide. With many of the usual suspects, you saw the typical panhandling and meaningless "REST IN POWER" BS, as well as attempts to blame the Farms for her death and put the blame on, effectively, anyone but themselves and the culture they created that turned Sagal into a pariah.Just the little details, to me; her 2018 tweets about Sagal(when they were already separated) post-immolation were toned as though "I don't want to be in the spotlight for this, please get facts right and move on, don't make Chloe a circus," and seemed genuine then. I have a hard time identifying with the need to social media-mention someone who's been dead 2+ years out of the blue, several times. But I'm also not a Portland tranny begging for work/bills on twitter, so it may just be out of my headspace to imagine.
There's nothing unusual in that twitter thread the screenshot comes from, and nothing interesting from recent tweets from Rani so I don't have any beef with him/her. I'm just confused by the "always online" element of these people's lives.
He's a real person? Is he worth a topic?
Am newfag, also retard because I clearly kept hitting the quote button while just intending to rubberneck at the human torch. Apologies.Congratulations, you just necroed a five year old post in a thread about someone who has been dead for years. Where the fuck are you retards coming from and what are you doing here?
I just came to laugh at this again as she roped.Congratulations, you just necroed a five year old post in a thread about someone who has been dead for years. Where the fuck are you retards coming from and what are you doing here?