Snowflake Chloe Wilkinson / DissociaDID and Nanette Zuniga / Nan / TeamPinata -

MaderaTheMad

kiwifarms.net
Interestingly enough, the song used for her intro is actually a snippet of this song. It does seem to be copyright free so she's safe on that front. That would mean that it would only be the visual artwork that would be something to claim.

Welcome back. It was about time you checked on this roaring dumpster fire.

A TLDR of everything thats happened so far:

• Chloe started slithering her way back into the DID scene but has been absolutely written off by all other creators.
• She had a few videos mysteriously taken down via copyright strikes. This would prove not to be her last run in with copyright issues.
•The strikes were later revealed to have been made by Sergio Costa, her former diehard stan. His name appeared on the claims. He came forward citing that him and Chloe had fallen out and it seemed to have been due to unrequited feelings being used to serve her purposes.
• Someone (could be GL, could be someone else, truly irrelevant) dug out a book that almost entirely explains her bizarre inner world she's concocted, right down to the cave bug-eyed Jade lives in and the alters themselves. GL ended up dissecting many parts of this book in a video, much to Chloe's horror.
•Chloe aggressively strikes GL, 6 videos in total, citing bullying and harassment as the reason. Youtibe deems this bullshit. Chloe disagrees and files for an appeal. YouTube steps in the moderate the situation, asking Chloe to justify her reasons for appealing their decision. She crafts a hilariously retarded letter which boiled down to "he bullied me because I am an LGBTQ member, mentally ill and an abuse victim!!1! He should be punished!". She also states that since her videos were used without her consent in GL's video, that is a copyright offense and qualifies for a strike. Youtube essentially tells Chloe to eat shit and puts the videos back up. But Chloe has now falsely striked someone 6 times, and she ends up facing possible channel termination.
•Realizing her error, Chloe runs off to her fans to inform them that her "past abuser" doesn't want her on YouTube any longer and for her safety she simply must retreat to Patreon to collect the shekels. Chloe thought she had her fans convinced until GL made a video, which was in itself a retarded display, showing her actions behind the scenes, sowing seeds of doubt in her fanbase.
•Slowly but surely her patrons started connecting the dots and her empire is starting to crumble at a rapid rate.

I've probably left some shit out but honestly this is all I actually bothered to retain. Its been a slow burn the few months.
Pretty certain GL was snooping in this thread as the SRA/Illuminati pdf was linked from here several days prior to his video exposé on it.


It's a fucking wild read if you have the brain cells to sacrifice.
 

comrade666

The Soviet System; Fronting; Chloe's Trust Pilot
kiwifarms.net
Chloe has always been... Interesting, shall we say? But Nan makes her look almost mundane by comparison. Almost.

Nan has literal brain damage and carves out chunks of her own flesh whilst fucking her own trooncunt to teen sneezeporn. I've got a theory she's been wrangled into inpatient. Chloe is just a bitch with creepy eyes and a disproportionate ego. I know which I'd rather watch amble towards an early grave on screen.

Yes, IAB is still milking the drama. Cringey made a video about the SRA situation and she claimed Chloe was anti-semitic.

Good on her. Probably too late to pose the who the fuck is Cringey? question. Googled anime girl glasses for her icon, probably wishes her handle was ironic, and wheels out some random Fourth Reich hysteria. I'll pass, 1/10 for attempting to shoehorn anti-semitism into this debacle. We really were missing the oven dodgers in this one. Although now I come to think of it, much of Nan's art could be spun as particularly Jewphobic in the hands of the right lefty.

Pretty certain GL was snooping in this thread as the SRA/Illuminati pdf was linked from here several days prior to his video exposé on it.

Most of the information from this thread has migrated elsewhere by now. IAB is the only one with the balls to source.
 

DeafChunt

kiwifarms.net
Would her past abuser be Sergio now? Or did Mother Kay tell her enough was enough?
Welcome Back.

So the speculation is that the 'abuser' is either the insufferable Grandads Lounge or Sergio (or perhaps a combination of the two of them in her mind). As the copyright system on both sides has got her into a load of shit with Youtube's TOS and maybe she came up with the story as a plausible out to save face before the channel is axed.

Of course there could easily be a former friend or family member putting the pressure on her to end the LARP.

As for IAB: she has called you out for a VoiCe MoDuLaTeD interview on her dazzling Youtube channel.
 

Cheese Dust

The Metric System
kiwifarms.net
Would her past abuser be Sergio now? Or did Mother Kay tell her enough was enough?

She has heavily implied it's GL on account of him being one of the first to make videos on her tomfoolery. Most have come to the conclusion it is indeed him, which is both hilarious and exceptional. The fact that he of all people was the one to hand her the shovel that dug her grave is mindlowing.

I'll catch up on the coverage and check on some sources. If they're not dead or cold, perhaps we'll have a life update or two from Nan. Any updates on the SRA situation? I have a deep dive I've been meaning to find use for, but if she's abandoned her association with First Person Plural and co. perhaps it's pointless to unravel that thread.
As far as Nan is concerned, someone on Reddit came forward talking about how they met her while underage on some disgusting snot porn fetish site. They expressed that Nan knew they were underage and inferred she was younger herself. Nan sent this person some of her gross art and steered the conversation in sexual ways concerning sneezing during copulation, which is honestly too horrifying a scenario to think on too long. And the magnificent cherry on this snotty sundae is that Nan had all these OC characters that later became her alters. The reddit poster recounted how they found her channel and couldn't believe the mental retardation she had to present them as her mental illness LARPs.

As for the SRA, much of Chloe's claims have started to become openly discussed as being complete bullshit. A couple of people have come forward talking about her sniffing around groups on Facebook, asking people for their stories and for certain books to read to craft her nonsense. She seems to have abandoned the hinting at SRA as she only listed being a survivor of domestic, sexual and child abuse in her YouTube defense letter. It would still be fascinating to see a deep dive and what that may stir up in the community further.
As for IAB: she has called you out for a VoiCe MoDuLaTeD interview on her dazzling Youtube channel.
Did she really? How wonderfully optimistic of her.
 
Last edited:

comrade666

The Soviet System; Fronting; Chloe's Trust Pilot
kiwifarms.net
Welcome Back.

So the speculation is that the 'abuser' is either the insufferable Grandads Lounge or Sergio (or perhaps a combination of the two of them in her mind). As the copyright system on both sides has got her into a load of shit with Youtube's TOS and maybe she came up with the story as a plausible out to save face before the channel is axed.

Of course there could easily be a former friend or family member putting the pressure on her to end the LARP.

Thanks. Good to see you still around.

Interesting. Initially, I thought Sergio was a sock and if you ask me it's still possible - Chloe loves to play the victim and having a former simp threaten to take her to court (for what?) is an interesting move. I wouldn't put it past Chloe to invent a semi-anonymous abuser to wheel out publicly. His claims of copyright infringement, or whatever the case may be, are intriguing and I could only see him having a case if he had been involved in the formation of the DissociaDID brand. If he does take it to court, I'll retract any suggestion he might be Chloe, or at least in on an orchestrated sympathy drive, but for now I've got my doubts about the entire Sergio saga, for various reasons.

The only individuals who might have a valid claim would be Jamie, who was very supportive in the very earliest days of the channel and may have played a role in the development of the brand, and Nan who was around right on the tail end of Jamie's departure from her life and featured as a longterm character on the channel. Some dull little simp who jumped through hoops to be able to edit her content later down the line, or whatever the claim is, wouldn't have much of a case, at least, not one that would be taken seriously. If you are hired as an editor, you do not have a claim to the material, merely a claim to credit or any prior agreement of compensation.

We know Chloe has previously hinted towards several abusers. Her parents, for one. Random Middle-England Satanic cult members, for another. An abusive former boyfriend. I think the boyfriend is most likely if it isn't Sergio or GL. Someone attempted to clear Kennedy's name without offering concrete proof and claimed the abusive ex has no social media presence. James Darby was left ambiguous but he predates DissociaDID. Some random lesbian popped up for a moment and disappeared again. That leaves Jamie and Nan. I've got a little digging to do into two other candidates who'll remain nameless lest I trigger a delete fucking everything episode again, but I'm sure plenty of the people Chloe has been publicly involved with are rightfully irritated that they've been dragged into this mess by association, and her vague claims of abuse leave them all in murky territory.

Anyone who has ever publicly associated with Chloe has a question mark over their name now - and there is a genuine risk to reputation, particularly when she associates with groups like FPP and RAINS, the latter being the organisation that publish a list of random people they believe are abusive members of pedophilic Satanic Cults just because their clients say so, amongst other dubious practices. It's likely that Chloe has been contacted by a relative or previous associate whose name has cropped up in the 'drama' surrounding her and she has used that as a convenient excuse to cry abuser and pack up shop now the heat is too high.

As for IAB: she has called you out for a VoiCe MoDuLaTeD interview on her dazzling Youtube channel.

Flattered I'm still on her mind, I missed that nasally bitch. Whilst we're not supposed to engage with cows outside the farms, she technically doesn't count as she isn't the subject of the thread. But I speak piss poor verbal English and voice modulation would make me all the more incomprehensible. And frankly, I've got nothing interesting to say that I don't already say here. She knows how to contact me if she has any specific questions relating to the shitshow of spergery I launched in thread, but I'm not about to awkwardly Ivan Drago my way through a conversation on her channel.
ETA - Is this an attempt to rekindle our strange farms to twitter communications? Commended? Babe, please.


Anyway, I did a little catching up on missed content, and I found it interesting that Chloe stated in her Valentines Day live that the home she is currently living in was intended for a partner and a family. So, that would be a family... with Nan? (:_(

"We got this house - rented this house - with the intention of sharing it with somebody for many years. It was supposed to be a family home and things fell apart before we moved in. So we've moved in, into lockdown, in this lovely house that we were supposed to share with somebody else and are all alone in it. And then lockdown happened, so we've been here by ourselves the whole time, except from when we've been in and out of treatment and stuff like that."
Timestamp: 12:06

From the established timeline, we know she is talking about Nan. We already knew that their relationship stretched on well beyond the allegations coming to light, but this sheds some additional light on the timeline of that relationship and her longterm intentions. What I also find interesting is that she made a point to state that she has been 'all alone' in this new house ever since. Seems like an irrelevant detail and overcompensation for a blatant lie to me, seeing as we all know she fully intended for Nan to move in with her up until at least July 2020.

On 22 February 2020, shortly after Nan returned to America, Chloe announced that she was being forced to move, as the owners of her home were looking to sell the property.

On 14 March 2020, this thread began. In the early days, there was some discussion surrounding child alters and the strange behaviour exhibited by Nan around these alters. However, much of the discussion focused on how blatant her bullshit was.

On 22 March 2020, Chloe announced that she had moved to a new home and was recovering from the threat of homelessness.

On 24 March 2020, Chloe claimed someone was trying to hack her. Some speculation as to whether she was alluding to us or to Trisha Paytas.

On 26 March 2020 we discovered Nan's fetish work for the first time. We know that in the following days and weeks more of that emerged and the extent of her depravity became clear.

On 28 March 2020, we had confirmation that Chloe had been lurking in thread or was being kept updated as to the contents of the thread.

On 6 April 2020, Chloe shared this post about a fireplace in her new home. Here is the original archive. Here is a cap with the date.
c.png


Between 7 - 9 April 2020 the situation escalated. Grandad's Lounge fired out content at a rapid rate. Public favour began to turn on Nan and Chloe.

On 10 April 2020 Nan went live with Chloe's support to dismiss the pedo allegations. Initially, all goes well. In the days that follow, Twitter spergs out and support begins to tank rapidly.

On 14 April 2020 Chloe posted her 'I didn't know my girlfriend was a pedophile' apology video.

On 7 July 2020 Nan released a statement claiming that she was allowed to be a pedophile because she was traumatised and a professional told her it was fine. There was speculation that Chloe was involved in the post due to the use of 'British English'. Mercedes had a big dyke meltdown and rage revealed that Chloe was still canvassing for Nan behind the scenes and had been for several weeks. (Archive)

On 16 July, it was revealed that the 'professional' in support of Nan was Fay Brown, a literal pedophile apologist who works with the 'MAP' community. Fay is infamous for claiming that it was unfair social workers were concerned with the presence of pedophiles in the home she shares with her children. This revelation quelled any possibility of a victorious return for Nan and is likely around the period Chloe began to wind down her contact with Nan.

There is far more to it than that, and I really ought to make a comprehensive timeline detailing the events that have taken place since, but the point stands. She still intended to raise a family in this home with Nan, even after learning about her preferences, which is horrifying.

What I find particularly interesting is that she states "things fell apart before we moved in".
If she is referring to the second home with the fireplace then this is categorically untrue. She moved into that property on or before 22 March 2020. She alluded to ending her relationship with Nan publicly on 14 April 2020. She continued to canvas for approval for Nan until at least 7 July 2020.

I will note that Nan unfollowed Chloe on Instagram on 19 March 2020, shortly before the anti-Nan train picked up steam. Perhaps there was trouble in Spergadise before the drama? Could it be that Nan's pedophilia actually brought them together again? Unlikely, but an interesting note with hindsight.

This leaves us with a few options in relation to the statement made in her February 2021 livestream.

The first being, she moved into a third property with another partner she intended to start a family with since breaking up with Nan, and this relationship has also fallen apart. We could make an argument for this, as the aesthetics and background of the home she is currently posting in do not necessarily match the background of the home she had moved into in April 2020. Perhaps I'm misremembering, but I do recall a third move at some stage.
Whilst she has had some form of involvement with individuals like Cam and Sergio in this time period, the exact nature of their relationship is unclear, and I doubt that she would attempt to move someone in, plan a family, and break up with them, all within the space of approximately ten months. I'm going to call this theory unlikely, but interesting.

Our second theory is far more likely. Chloe is once again attempting to gaslight her fans and rewrite her history by claiming that her relationship with Nan ended the moment she became aware of any allegations in March 2020. Which we know is untrue - she found out about the allegations around 24-28 March 2020, went ahead and moved into a 'family home' she hoped to share with Nan, and continued to unsuccessfully campaign to restore Nan's reputation until at least 7 July 2020. Now, she seems to be attempting to walk that back with her we fell apart before we moved in statements.

Third option, she is deeply retarded and can't keep her story straight. She thought playing the I've lived alone in this house big enough for a whole family since the beginning of the UK Lockdowns card would be a great sympathy hook, forgetting that her scandal with Nan even happened in the first place and I've overanalysed this situation to death.

As for the SRA, much of Chloe's claims have started to become openly discussed as being complete bullshit. A couple of people have come forward talking about her sniffing around groups on Facebook, asking people for their stories and for certain books to read to craft her nonsense. She seems to have abandoned the hinting at SRA as she only listed being a survivor of domestic, sexual and child abuse in her YouTube defense letter. It would still be fascinating to see a deep dive and what that may stir up in the community further.

Interesting. This has been a theory for quite some time now, but many of the caps taken from Facebook were dismissed thanks to that one fake cap circulating on Twitter from a group chat involving a fake Chloe. Twitter loves to shoot their load early and it gave Chloe a significant advantage. Interesting to see that the legitimate caps are now being scrutinised. Good.
 
Last edited:

SpiceBow

kiwifarms.net
Thanks. Good to see you still around.

Interesting. Initially, I thought Sergio was a sock and if you ask me it's still possible - Chloe loves to play the victim and having a former simp threaten to take her to court (for what?) is an interesting move. I wouldn't put it past Chloe to invent a semi-anonymous abuser to wheel out publicly. His claims of copyright infringement, or whatever the case may be, are intriguing and I could only see him having a case if he had been involved in the formation of the DissociaDID brand. If he does take it to court, I'll retract any suggestion he might be Chloe, or at least in on an orchestrated sympathy drive, but for now I've got my doubts about the entire Sergio saga, for various reasons.

The only individuals who might have a valid claim would be Jamie, who was very supportive in the very earliest days of the channel and may have played a role in the development of the brand, and Nan who was around right on the tail end of Jamie's departure from her life and featured as a longterm character on the channel. Some dull little simp who jumped through hoops to be able to edit her content later down the line, or whatever the claim is, wouldn't have much of a case, at least, not one that would be taken seriously. If you are hired as an editor, you do not have a claim to the material, merely a claim to credit or any prior agreement of compensation.

We know Chloe has previously hinted towards several abusers. Her parents, for one. Random Middle-England Satanic cult members, for another. An abusive former boyfriend. I think the boyfriend is most likely if it isn't Sergio or GL. Someone attempted to clear Kennedy's name without offering concrete proof and claimed the abusive ex has no social media presence. James Darby was left ambiguous but he predates DissociaDID. Some random lesbian popped up for a moment and disappeared again. That leaves Jamie and Nan. I've got a little digging to do into two other candidates who'll remain nameless lest I trigger a delete fucking everything episode again, but I'm sure plenty of the people Chloe has been publicly involved with are rightfully irritated that they've been dragged into this mess by association, and her vague claims of abuse leave them all in murky territory.

Anyone who has ever publicly associated with Chloe has a question mark over their name now - and there is a genuine risk to reputation, particularly when she associates with groups like FPP and RAINS, the latter being the organisation that publish a list of random people they believe are abusive members of pedophilic Satanic Cults just because their clients say so, amongst other dubious practices. It's likely that Chloe has been contacted by a relative or previous associate whose name has cropped up in the 'drama' surrounding her and she has used that as a convenient excuse to cry abuser and pack up shop now the heat is too high.



Flattered I'm still on her mind, I missed that nasally bitch. Whilst we're not supposed to engage with cows outside the farms, she technically doesn't count as she isn't the subject of the thread. But I speak piss poor verbal English and voice modulation would make me all the more incomprehensible. And frankly, I've got nothing interesting to say that I don't already say here. She knows how to contact me if she has any specific questions relating to the shitshow of spergery I launched in thread, but I'm not about to awkwardly Ivan Drago my way through a conversation on her channel.


Anyway, I did a little catching up on missed content, and I found it interesting that Chloe stated in her Valentines Day live that the home she is currently living in was intended for a partner and a family. So, that would be a family... with Nan? (:_(


Timestamp: 12:06

From the established timeline, we know she is talking about Nan. We already knew that their relationship stretched on well beyond the allegations coming to light, but this sheds some additional light on the timeline of that relationship and her longterm intentions. What I also find interesting is that she made a point to state that she has been 'all alone' in this new house ever since. Seems like an irrelevant detail and overcompensation for a blatant lie to me, seeing as we all know she fully intended for Nan to move in with her up until at least July 2020.

On 22 February 2020, shortly after Nan returned to America, Chloe announced that she was being forced to move, as the owners of her home were looking to sell the property.

On 14 March 2020, this thread began. In the early days, there was some discussion surrounding child alters and the strange behaviour exhibited by Nan around these alters. However, much of the discussion focused on how blatant her bullshit was.

On 22 March 2020, Chloe announced that she had moved to a new home and was recovering from the threat of homelessness.

On 24 March 2020, Chloe claimed someone was trying to hack her. Some speculation as to whether she was alluding to us or to Trisha Paytas.

On 26 March 2020 we discovered Nan's fetish work for the first time. We know that in the following days and weeks more of that emerged and the extent of her depravity became clear.

On 28 March 2020, we had confirmation that Chloe had been lurking in thread or was being kept updated as to the contents of the thread.

On 6 April 2020, Chloe shared this post about a fireplace in her new home. Here is the original archive. Here is a cap with the date.
View attachment 2109412

Between 7 - 9 April 2020 the situation escalated. Grandad's Lounge fired out content at a rapid rate. Public favour began to turn on Nan and Chloe.

On 10 April 2020 Nan went live with Chloe's support to dismiss the pedo allegations. Initially, all goes well. In the days that follow, Twitter spergs out and support begins to tank rapidly.

On 14 April 2020 Chloe posted her 'I didn't know my girlfriend was a pedophile' apology video.

On 7 July 2020 Nan released a statement claiming that she was allowed to be a pedophile because she was traumatised and a professional told her it was fine. There was speculation that Chloe was involved in the post due to the use of 'British English'. Mercedes had a big dyke meltdown and rage revealed that Chloe was still canvassing for Nan behind the scenes and had been for several weeks. (Archive)

On 16 July, it was revealed that the 'professional' in support of Nan was Fay Brown, a literal pedophile apologist who works with the 'MAP' community. Fay is infamous for claiming that it was unfair social workers were concerned with the presence of pedophiles in the home she shares with her children. This revelation quelled any possibility of a victorious return for Nan and is likely around the period Chloe began to wind down her contact with Nan.

There is far more to it than that, and I really ought to make a comprehensive timeline detailing the events that have taken place since, but the point stands. She still intended to raise a family in this home with Nan, even after learning about her preferences, which is horrifying.

What I find particularly interesting is that she states "things fell apart before we moved in".
If she is referring to the second home with the fireplace then this is categorically untrue. She moved into that property on or before 22 March 2020. She alluded to ending her relationship with Nan publicly on 14 April 2020. She continued to canvas for approval for Nan until at least 7 July 2020.

I will note that Nan unfollowed Chloe on Instagram on 19 March 2020, shortly before the anti-Nan train picked up steam. Perhaps there was trouble in Spergadise before the drama? Could it be that Nan's pedophilia actually brought them together again? Unlikely, but an interesting note with hindsight.

This leaves us with a few options in relation to the statement made in her February 2021 livestream.

The first being, she moved into a third property with another partner she intended to start a family with since breaking up with Nan, and this relationship has also fallen apart. We could make an argument for this, as the aesthetics and background of the home she is currently posting in do not necessarily match the background of the home she had moved into in April 2020. Perhaps I'm misremembering, but I do recall a third move at some stage.
Whilst she has had some form of involvement with individuals like Cam and Sergio in this time period, the exact nature of their relationship is unclear, and I doubt that she would attempt to move someone in, plan a family, and break up with them, all within the space of approximately ten months. I'm going to call this theory unlikely, but interesting.

Our second theory is far more likely. Chloe is once again attempting to gaslight her fans and rewrite her history by claiming that her relationship with Nan ended the moment she became aware of any allegations in March 2020. Which we know is untrue - she found out about the allegations around 24-28 March 2020, went ahead and moved into a 'family home' she hoped to share with Nan, and continued to unsuccessfully campaign to restore Nan's reputation until at least 7 July 2020. Now, she seems to be attempting to walk that back with her we fell apart before we moved in statements.

Third option, she is deeply retarded and can't keep her story straight. She thought playing the I've lived alone in this house big enough for a whole family since the beginning of the UK Lockdowns card would be a great sympathy hook, forgetting that her scandal with Nan even happened in the first place and I've overanalysed this situation to death.



Interesting. This has been a theory for quite some time now, but many of the caps taken from Facebook were dismissed thanks to that one fake cap circulating on Twitter from a group chat involving a fake Chloe. Twitter loves to shoot their load early and it gave Chloe a significant advantage. Interesting to see that the legitimate caps are now being scrutinised. Good.
Dude, Sergio is already suing her
 

comrade666

The Soviet System; Fronting; Chloe's Trust Pilot
kiwifarms.net
Dude, Sergio is already suing her

But is he though? Or is he just tweeting about it? Where is the definitive proof? There is a difference between a lunatic emailing YouTube with baseless claims, and between issuing an actual court summons. In the caps he's posted so far, YouTube state his claim requires further investigation. Am I missing further evidence? Until I see something official I'm not going to believe it.

I would love to see this go to court. It would be a genuinely funny outcome. But where is the proof? He's certainly trying to sue her, or making steps in the right direction. But this is the problem with Twitter and Plebbit - they take every wild declaration by strangers on the internet as indisputable fact without waiting to watch it play out.

I am suing Chloe. I am suing Nan. I have spoken with my solicitor and I am actually in Manningtree right now. My solicitor says this is going to be big and guarantees that both Chloe and Nan will serve a life sentence for being embarrassing on the internet. It's happening. It's fact. You can tell Twitter it's going down. My solicitor has sworn on his Grandmother's life. That's fact.
 
Last edited:

Wolf Blitzer

The Most Trusted Name In News
kiwifarms.net
But is he though? Or is he just tweeting about it? Where is the definitive proof? There is a difference between a lunatic emailing YouTube with baseless claims, and between issuing an actual court summons. In the caps he's posted so far, YouTube state his claim requires further investigation. Am I missing further evidence? Until I see something official I'm not going to believe it.

I would love to see this go to court. It would be a genuinely funny outcome. But where is the proof? He's certainly trying to sue her, or making steps in the right direction. But this is the problem with Twitter and Plebbit - they take every wild declaration by strangers on the internet as indisputable fact without waiting to watch it play out.

I am suing Chloe. I am suing Nan. I have spoken with my solicitor and I am actually in Manningtree right now. My solicitor says this is going to be big and guarantees that both Chloe and Nan will serve a life sentence for being embarrassing on the internet. It's happening. It's fact. You can tell Twitter it's going down. My solicitor has sworn on his Grandmother's life. That's fact.
012A9521-C05B-4816-ABB3-3A15BC6A98BA.jpeg
excuse me, I have it on good authority that Chloe missed her court appearance for Sergio’s lawsuit
 

comrade666

The Soviet System; Fronting; Chloe's Trust Pilot
kiwifarms.net
View attachment 2110729
excuse me, I have it on good authority that Chloe missed her court appearance for Sergio’s lawsuit

I stand corrected. Very official.

But honestly - this is the level of evidence certain platforms would run with. I've been catching up throughout the day, and the levels of hysteria surrounding this supposed lawsuit made me think something had actually happened for a change. But this is based on what? His word? Some stock response emails from YouTube who are obligated to investigate every claim? I'm genuinely trying to understand the uproar, and so far the only answer I've got is that every Chloe spectator has a serious case of brain rot.

This is what I imagine it would be like if someone developed an instant cure for severe mental retardation. Suddenly developing self awareness in room full of flailing gurners and coming to the understanding that everyone around you is covered in their own piss and babbling nonsensically. I hope I'm wrong though. If true, it would be deeply satisfying.
 

00000000

no
kiwifarms.net
Anyone have the deets on the latest $5 patreon post she put up? Based on the title, it should be worth a solid chuckle, at the least. Looks like another comic.
 

00000000

no
kiwifarms.net
Please source your posts. Doubtful I'm not the only one who has no idea what you're on about.
Link to her Patreon (I'd link directly to the post, but I can't because I'm not a patron.)
Screenshot_20210422-224350_Chrome.jpg

Hope this helps. Didn't realize I wasn't specific enough, especially since the existence of her Patreon is extremely common knowledge. I'll not post requests next time without links/screenshots.

Also, "doubtful I'm not the only one" means you're likely the only one. Double negatives & all that.
 

DeafChunt

kiwifarms.net
Anyone who has ever publicly associated with Chloe has a question mark over their name now - and there is a genuine risk to reputation,
Absolutely. There must be a growing number of people from her past who feel like they could be dragged through the court of public opinion any second by her rabid stans.

I'll be interested to see this new boogeyman when we inevitably find out who it is. They could do worse than coming forward here and sharing what joy they have to share. :)

Anyway, I did a little catching up on missed content, and I found it interesting that Chloe stated in her Valentines Day live that the home she is currently living in was intended for a partner and a family. So, that would be a family... with Nan?
What a genuinely terrifying thought, and given the apparent state of child services in the UK (and others) I'm sure that if they persisted enough they'd have gotten access to children to adopt. As a stunning and brave neuro-divergent couple.

I just thought of a Papa Nan doing her best Salad Fingers impression... No child deserves that.

This leaves us with a few options in relation to the statement made in her February 2021 livestream.
So given the options available and everything we know about our malingering princess, I'd probably lean toward her rewriting her personal history to make herself appear less like a pedophile-white-knight. However judging by the letter she wrote to Youtube regarding her copyright claim - I am reminded to never again put any amount of nativity or retardation past her...
 

comrade666

The Soviet System; Fronting; Chloe's Trust Pilot
kiwifarms.net
I'll be interested to see this new boogeyman when we inevitably find out who it is. They could do worse than coming forward here and sharing what joy they have to share. :)

Personally, I would lean towards Jamie, or one of her parents as the 'past abuser'. Someone who has been mentioned in this thread and beyond, who would rather their name didn't come up in a Google search connected to pedophilia, sneeze erotica, thinly veiled racism and general malingering. I wouldn't know if this is the case everywhere, but when searching 'Kay Wilkinson Manningtree' this thread is on the first page of results. Jamie's name and social media appears in thread. I imagine he might take some issue with that, and someone on Twitter claimed to have contacted him at one stage.

We've had plenty of people come forward claiming to be associated with Chloe. Only one backed that up - Craig, a university classmate. No one personally reached out to Craig and he came here willingly. Her antics and the events of the last year are common knowledge within her peer group, and I'm sure no one wants the association. It is typical of Chloe to spin this as an abuser attempting to silence her when it is much more likely her parents found out what she had been saying about them and asked her to stop. Or, Jamie or another old associate got tired of being harassed on Twitter and asked her to clear their name.

It makes me wonder how this might have played out if the thread had gone under the radar for a while longer. It has played out arguably successfully - a year down the line, we've milked them pretty dry, we've got some good material, and every time I think we're done, they give us a little something extra. But it's a shame people went on a cow tipping spree with this one. They were much more entertaining before they knew they were being observed and with pressure from family and friends to stop lying on the internet, we've lost a good few months of material. They were in their prime when we found them so it's regrettable - call me a moralfag, but in many ways, it was worth it to see a pedophile go dark.

What a genuinely terrifying thought, and given the apparent state of child services in the UK (and others) I'm sure that if they persisted enough they'd have gotten access to children to adopt. As a stunning and brave neuro-divergent couple.

Particularly if it prevents her starting a fucking family. Jesus. I already wonder how Jess of M&Ms child copes with her Mother screaming and wailing until she's medically sedated every few days, but at least Jess isn't a pedophile. Small mercies with this 'community'.

So given the options available and everything we know about our malingering princess, I'd probably lean toward her rewriting her personal history to make herself appear less like a pedophile-white-knight. However judging by the letter she wrote to Youtube regarding her copyright claim - I am reminded to never again put any amount of nativity or retardation past her...

I'd be inclined to agree with you. Her activities during her hiatus are intriguing, but I can't see her fitting in a serious relationship and break up without letting at least a little information slip through the cracks. It is in keeping with her previous mode of operation. She DARVOs hard. She's never had any qualms about lying to her audience to save face - but she's a piss poor liar. She might get away with it offline, but online, there is a clear record of everything she has said and done that directly contradicts her story. We know she stayed with Nan for at least four to five months after the allegations.

Admitting it would be career suicide - and I've notice that Chloe never admits fault. It's an interesting tactic. Some people like to give a little something small to appease the masses and deflect from any major fuck ups. Not Chloe. I've never seen her admit she was wrong, misinformed, or even misremembering. She only came close with Nadia, and even then, she came armed with excuses and justifications, never quite acknowledging that she was in the wrong. It was the audience who had simply misunderstood her. It has to be pathological, her inability to admit fault, no matter how much evidence stacks up against her.

Anyway - someone posted a new Patreon dump :shit-eating::shit-eating::shit-eating:

Highlights:

Nadia feels deeply insecure now that everyone hates her Red Indian impression.

'Someone' groomed her last summer following her suicide attempt. Sergio, what have you done? Or could it be Cam?

Chloe has BPD now - she was diagnosed many years ago but had absolutely no idea because she has quirky amnesia.

Inner world Kyle looks like a faggot and Chloe wishes she was a natural blonde.

She claims Kyle has now been with her since she was three years old as opposed to previous claims that he appeared when she was four. And five. His arrival in her head is incredibly ambiguous as detailed in her timeline, but again, she is doubling down on her claims that some serious abuse took place before the age of three, and was so severe she developed DID. It can only be Kay and Stuart.

Chloe claims that she as 'Nin' is now a trauma holder and has knowledge of trauma from her youth.

Donnie is next in line to take Sergio's simp seat.

Not my caps, credit to some random plebbitor.

1619197580128.png
1619197598390.png
1619197612640.png
1619197646415.png
1619197668955.png
1619197704426.png

1619197729027.png
1619197751826.png
1619197780914.png
1619197812676.png
1619197826091.png
 
Last edited:

prettybad

DO WORSE.
kiwifarms.net
Chloe has BPD now
Bad news for tapping into that market: Chloe's not hardcore enough to be a bpdfag. There's plenty of sideshow freaks of that ilk on the internet much more entertaining than her standard issue grift. 2-inch self-harm scar tissue sleeve on both arms or gtfo.

So apparently Kyle has the body of an ftm. This is either a Freudian slip or just that she's traced some shit tier template "reference".
 

Cheese Dust

The Metric System
kiwifarms.net
Teehee, amnesia walls amirite??

I distinctly remember in one livestream, where Chloe and Nan showcased that horrifying amount of PDA while Bo sat holding candle, that Chloe expressed how terrible Nan's life must be on account of having BPD and how she couldn't imagine living like that. Which upon reflection is just another retarded Chloe moment as she's the same girl who implies she was used as a satanic pin cushion. How convenient to rediscover this new diagnosis at a time when her public standing has never been weaker.
 

aanoo

kiwifarms.net
I'm not gonna lie, if Chloe has an actual diagnosis, EUPD would be the least surprising for a doctor to give her. Like she's a young woman (the stereotype) with attention-seeking and parasuicidal behaviour off the charts; she can't keep up studies or a real job, or a maintain a relationship that's not an epic disaster. All of her issues would be solved by growing the fuck up though.
 

Donovan the Man

Best 2 silver coins I’ve ever spent.
kiwifarms.net
Lmao, Chloe’s self dx BPD. Her manipulations and drama is way too composed for an untreated BPD case. BPDs do hardcore suicide attempts to manipulate people as they actually want to die and the grief the suicide will cause is the sweetest revenge, not fake and gay throwaway threats. She’s too arrogant, confident, and self-absorb to successfully LARP BPD. BPDs’ self loathing is like nothing else.
 

Similar threads

Man hater, tranny shill, superstraight sperg, Canadian BLM advocate, confused "bigender"
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • Locked
Self-Immolated to Protest The US Mental Health System. Currently Being Exploited by her "Allies".
Replies
3K
Views
627K
Top