...Look, I don't even hate you so why applying "Wierding out snare" is important is something mysterious...
What?
...Look, I don't even hate you so why applying "Wierding out snare" is important is something mysterious...
You do weird me out.Wierding out snare
Surely, y'knew to interpret that as intimidation? Well, we know that you come from America's equivalent of the counciled temnentia in neo-Sectional talk......
What?
What the fuck am I reading here? Half this shit isn't even real words.Surely, y'knew to interpret that as intimidation? Well, we know that you come from America's equivalent of the counciled temnentia in neo-Sectional talk...
I may know on average by active recall but I have a shitty-ish Hobbes and Guillies dictionary or whatever it's called, the Scottish-English Standard Cultural Speech level stratification-of-language dictionary: I find it limited in IQ equivalency, in fact, it was basically redundant by the time I was 14 and my secondary-level English teacher considered my essay writing at age equivalency+2.5 by then, so let's call it an IQ-107 dictionary. I'm going to Dancing Marks you here the old TocharTV style, son, what verbal IQ beneath 85, even, do you really believe yourself to have exhibited, worthless Gweilling?What the fuck am I reading here? Half this shit isn't even real words.
That book looks like you got it out of a trash canI may know on average by active recall but I have a shitty-ish Hobbes and Guillies dictionary or whatever it's called, the Scottish-English Standard Cultural Speech level stratification-of-language dictionary: I find it limited in IQ equivalency, in fact, it was basically redundant by the time I was 14 and my secondary-level English teacher considered my essay writing at age equivalency+2.5 by then, so let's call it an IQ-107 dictionary. I'm going to Dancing Marks you here the old TocharTV style, son, what verbal IQ beneath 85, even, do you really believe yourself to have exhibited, worthless Gweilling?
View attachment 1860358
A neo-Rennie era reference of Scot's "formal" or "gentrified English"; the title even looks north fucking Koreanic!
The cheapest dictionaries in my era were deliberately up-priced as education ware for about £25 other than this, and sometimes required "Class Non-Reprobancy Status" if you were not inherently post-working unless you were "gifted from working", limits on PDD were lifted from my Performance IQ score which became "practically gifted from working", I'd won the right to own even cheap dictionaries even if I had owned a dictionary at all. Post-correction from 95 to 128 in third year from retesting, I had actually won a "Rennie offer" of a £300 mega-set to be reclaimed from WHSmith, if I remember, but I'd never collected it if I recall and is it as hell that anyone would remember much to my neglect: it was the mid-2000s, which may as well be as the mid-1960s as to anyone back then, and well, wors still, or better perhaps for the pure inadvertency: it would therefore be "out of print verboten" rather than genuinely inasmuch. Still, then, conversion to WHSmith "Rennusian era credit" should be considered or even more to the equivalency of such offer. I want ethnocentric (light-ish on this for some gifted and talented alternative groups) socialism back. ;_; I'm having another "wistful swing" which is common in Racoon Dog type RAD hebephrenia-sans-schizophrenia type.That book looks like you got it out of a trash can
Or you could just have installed a dictionary in your freaking phone like a normal personThe cheapest dictionaries in my era were deliberately up-priced as education ware for about £25 other than this, and sometimes required "Class Non-Reprobancy Status" if you were not inherently post-working unless you were "gifted from working", limits on PDD were lifted from my Performance IQ score which became "practically gifted from working", I'd won the right to own even cheap dictionaries even if I had owned a dictionary at all. Post-correction from 95 to 128 in third year from retesting, I had actually won a "Rennie offer" of a £300 mega-set to be reclaimed from WHSmith, if I remember, but I'd never collected it if I recall and is it as hell that anyone would remember much to my neglect: it was the mid-2000s, which may as well be as the mid-1960s as to anyone back then, and well, wors still, or better perhaps for the pure inadvertency: it would therefore be "out of print verboten" rather than genuinely inasmuch. Still, then, conversion to WHSmith "Rennusian era credit" should be considered or even more to the equivalency of such offer. I want ethnocentric (light-ish on this for some gifted and talented alternative groups) socialism back. ;_; I'm having another "wistful swing" which is common in Racoon Dog type RAD hebephrenia-sans-schizophrenia type.
That's fine. The explanation is simpler than had ever lent justification to the idea you were clever enough to apprehend this innately but you appear to have forgotten: 1. It is the wrong dialect (published in Scotland, described insetly to be of the cultural vernacular here, a dialect of English partially Gaelic, minorly Flemo-Dutch, and occasionally neologistic from literal loan-borrows of East German and North Korean concepts in old political eras and as of late, annoyingly, Nordic ones; basically it is about as highly indigenised a form of English as you can get and even proles speak the cultured speech when they aren't brain-dead which is more common than one might think), 2. It follows on for me to believe an unaccountability may exist in the American's lack of pre/sub-AP provision for neologistically transterpolative profixtiature of phrasal transformation?The title of this thread is misleading, this isn't a man. This is an overly confident little boy who autistically reads an old ass dictionary but is too infantile to deduce how to properly use the vast majority of his cobbled together vernacular, let alone form a coherent statement.
@Autphag you are boring and not smart.
YOU. ARE. NOT. SMART.That's fine. The explanation is simpler than had ever lent justification to the idea you were clever enough to apprehend this innately but you appear to have forgotten: 1. It is the wrong dialect (published in Scotland, described insetly to be of the cultural vernacular here, a dialect of English partially Gaelic, minorly Flemo-Dutch, and occasionally neologistic from literal loan-borrows of East German and North Korean concepts in old political eras and as of late, annoyingly, Nordic ones; basically it is about as highly indigenised a form of English as you can get and even proles speak the cultured speech when they aren't brain-dead which is more common than one might think), 2. It follows on for me to believe an unaccountability may exist in the American's lack of pre/sub-AP provision for neologistically transterpolative profixtiature of phrasal transformation?
If that was a refutation I'd gladly accept internalisation of that receptively. It's not, so, outstripping your intelligence in smartness expectations is all I've anticipated having genuinely oneupped you out-performatatively.YOU. ARE. NOT. SMART.
Sorry sport.
And it's still better than mine.That's the handwriting of a serial killer.
Using big words doesn't make you smart, it just makes you look like a pretentious retard.If that was a refutation I'd gladly accept internalisation of that receptively. It's not, so, outstripping your intelligence in smartness expectations is all I've anticipated having genuinely oneupped you out-performatatively.
FTFYUsing big words doesn't make you smart, it just makesyou look like apretentiousretard.
And a nutjob.And it's still better than mine.
Using big words doesn't make you smart, it just makes you look like a pretentious retard.
Yet I hadn't pretended that these words in the following book "don't exist" or that it's quite normal for average intelligence proletarians to use them here unlike there; we just wonder if American disacculturation has become worryingly apexical...And it's still better than mine.
Using big words doesn't make you smart, it just makes you look like a pretentious retard.
You should spend more time looking up the medical science behind the disabilities you have rather than big words you don't have the capability of using in a cohesive manner because you clearly have fetal alcohol syndrome face.Yet I hadn't pretended that these words in the following book "don't exist" or that it's quite normal for average intelligence proletarians to use them here unlike there; we just wonder if American disacculturation has become worryingly apexical...View attachment 1860711
Anti-Reprobancy era Cultured Speech Standard Scottish English dialect dictionary reference, c. ~2004, 1991 initial publish run and design
Refusal of recognition of racial vesture is to be performed non-existently upon Mongoloid impregnesses with either Racoon Dog type syndra or "practically gifted from working" Irreprobancy markers in the Reprobacy Act era; this is extensive to partial breeds; it is reasoned legally on general clan equivancy abilitatively with the most elitely disabortificated often even from crippling deprivation and we refuse to kowtow in our country's custom standardly or have manifestations of vehemently strict desire to uphold inassuch considered subsumatively something in equivalence with, equivocally, a psychiatrically awry complaint in the presumptive.You should spend more time looking up the medical science behind the disabilities you have rather than big words you don't have the capability of using in a cohesive manner because you clearly have fetal alcohol syndrome face.
Just me and myRefusal of recognition of racial vesture is to be performed non-existently upon Mongoloid impregnesses with either Racoon Dog type syndra or "practically gifted from working" Irreprobancy markers in the Reprobacy Act era; this is extensive to partial breeds; it is reasoned legally on general clan equivancy abilitatively with the most elitely disabortificated often even from crippling deprivation and we refuse to kowtow in our country's custom standardly or have manifestations of vehemently strict desire to uphold inassuch considered subsumatively something in equivalence with, equivocally, a psychiatrically awry complaint in the presumptive.