N
NQ 952
Guest
kiwifarms.net
Now comes We All as the ‘Clan of ‘clay’ as the Relators, the quasi plaintiffs/appellants and real parties of interest, having brought a suit in error in the cause at bar, shall here to forward to be known as: “Clayton-m: bates (hereafter Son '“c|ay), an innocent Child incarnated in the resurrected flesh and blood on May 24 in the Year of Our Lord and Savior 2012, the Mother and Maker of Son “clay, “rachael-n: parks (hereafter Mother "'parkS) in the resurrected flesh and blood and thus as Mother and Maker ofthe real property she is the lawful owner ofthe real property, Son "clay, and does claim her property appearing with her innocent Son ”c|ay, " rlotus: justice (hereafter Counselor ”‘justice) in the resurrected flesh and blood, appearing as Executor de son Tort for both Mother "parks and Son “clay and as Relator and lawfully appointed Guardian ofSon “clay as appointed by the Mother with unlimited, springing powers of attorney over him, and the Family and Kin of Son "clay in the resurrected flesh and blood inclusive of, and with specificity, the maternal Great Aunt by marriage of Son "clay, “beverly: croy (hereafter Aunt ”croy) in the resurrected flesh and blood; and the maternal Great Aunt by flesh and blood of Son "clay, “misty-c: brickles (hereafter Aunt Nbrickles). Wherefore We All as the Clan of "clay as Relators, the quasi plaintiffs/appellants and real parties of interest, having brought a suit in error in the cause at bar, do come forth acting in the best interest of the innocent child, their Son, Ward, Family and Kin, Son "clay representing in Propria Personam as is a Substantial Right of All pursuant to the Judiciary Act of 17891 and as affirmed in The Benedictine, also known as Benedict on Admiraltyzunder The Common I_.aw, The Natural Law, as the chosen and appointed Guardians and Counselors by Divinity ofThe One True God, for and ofthe real flesh and blood innocent child, Son Nclay.
Wherefore We All as the Clan of "clay do approach THE SUPREME COURTOF OHIO, a corporate person operating a purported 'judiciaI’ administrative forum in commerce in a name similar in implied form and function to the supreme Court OfI_.aw designated in the amended Ohio Constitution Article IV, having the original jurisdiction pursuant to Ohio Constitution Article IV, Section 2(B)(1)(f) in any cause on review as may be necessary to complete a determination, in appellate jurisdiction pursuant to Ohio Constitution Article IV, Sections 2(B)(2)(a)(iii) in appeals from the courts of appeals as a matter of right when the case does involve questions arising under the constitution of the United States or of the state, Ohio Constitution Article IV, Sections 2(B)(2)(d) in such revisoryjurisdiction of the proceedings of administrative officers or agencies as may be conferred bylaw, and Ohio Constitution Article IV, Sections 2(B)(2)(e) in cases of public or great general interest. We do bring this Jurisdiction Appeal forth as we aver and assert that the averments and assertions proposed in the interlocutory order MAGISTRATE’S ORDER (See Exhibit A, attached as if fully rewritten here) filed on September 30, 2016 by "sharon-a: maerten—moore with THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT HIGHLAND COUNTY (hereafter "Aim APPEALS") is a final decision and judgment in a cause at bar which does involve the termination ofthe Substantial Rights ofthe Mother, Family and Kin to the care custody and control of their innocent Child, Son "clay which did violate the Substantial Rights of We All as the Clan of Nclay inclusive of our rights to due process of law, as preserved and delineated by Article 1, Section 10, Clause 1, Article II, Section 2, Clause 1, and the 15‘, 4", 5" 6"" 7"‘, 8"‘, 9"‘, 10"‘, 11", 13"“", and 14"‘ Amendments to the United States ofAmerica Constitutions, both de jure in Law and de facto by statute, The Sherman Anti Trust Act of 1890 and the Social Security Act Title IV. Wherefore, we are aver and assert that though the MAGISTRATE’S ORDER is an interlocutory order, by its enactment it is a final decision and judgment which affects and effects the Substantial Rights of the parties, We All as the Clan of “clay, in the cause at bar and does additionally raise substantial constitutional questions that are of great interest and concern to th e People at large, the General Government and the National Government as it does relate to the administration ofthe Social Security Act Title IV and the interstate commerce derived thereof by the General Government of the STATE OF OHIO, its agencies and agents. All Rights are reserved by the Clan of"c|ay in the creation and submission of this instrument.
The remainder ofthis page is left blank intentionally.
Wherefore We All as the Clan of "clay do approach THE SUPREME COURTOF OHIO, a corporate person operating a purported 'judiciaI’ administrative forum in commerce in a name similar in implied form and function to the supreme Court OfI_.aw designated in the amended Ohio Constitution Article IV, having the original jurisdiction pursuant to Ohio Constitution Article IV, Section 2(B)(1)(f) in any cause on review as may be necessary to complete a determination, in appellate jurisdiction pursuant to Ohio Constitution Article IV, Sections 2(B)(2)(a)(iii) in appeals from the courts of appeals as a matter of right when the case does involve questions arising under the constitution of the United States or of the state, Ohio Constitution Article IV, Sections 2(B)(2)(d) in such revisoryjurisdiction of the proceedings of administrative officers or agencies as may be conferred bylaw, and Ohio Constitution Article IV, Sections 2(B)(2)(e) in cases of public or great general interest. We do bring this Jurisdiction Appeal forth as we aver and assert that the averments and assertions proposed in the interlocutory order MAGISTRATE’S ORDER (See Exhibit A, attached as if fully rewritten here) filed on September 30, 2016 by "sharon-a: maerten—moore with THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT HIGHLAND COUNTY (hereafter "Aim APPEALS") is a final decision and judgment in a cause at bar which does involve the termination ofthe Substantial Rights ofthe Mother, Family and Kin to the care custody and control of their innocent Child, Son "clay which did violate the Substantial Rights of We All as the Clan of Nclay inclusive of our rights to due process of law, as preserved and delineated by Article 1, Section 10, Clause 1, Article II, Section 2, Clause 1, and the 15‘, 4", 5" 6"" 7"‘, 8"‘, 9"‘, 10"‘, 11", 13"“", and 14"‘ Amendments to the United States ofAmerica Constitutions, both de jure in Law and de facto by statute, The Sherman Anti Trust Act of 1890 and the Social Security Act Title IV. Wherefore, we are aver and assert that though the MAGISTRATE’S ORDER is an interlocutory order, by its enactment it is a final decision and judgment which affects and effects the Substantial Rights of the parties, We All as the Clan of “clay, in the cause at bar and does additionally raise substantial constitutional questions that are of great interest and concern to th e People at large, the General Government and the National Government as it does relate to the administration ofthe Social Security Act Title IV and the interstate commerce derived thereof by the General Government of the STATE OF OHIO, its agencies and agents. All Rights are reserved by the Clan of"c|ay in the creation and submission of this instrument.
The remainder ofthis page is left blank intentionally.
