- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Try to get to this level of wokeness, you racist white devils
It isn't more "historically accurate" of course. It's just more KAAAAAANGZ bullshit.
Try to get to this level of wokeness, you racist white devils
Because for all the talking they do about their African ancestors the reality is that they don't actually care. They know damn well that the most famous stuff happened in Egypt since the ancient Egyptians left giant monuments and massive tombs all over the place and their ancestor's didn't.I would love a historical docu-drama about the Solominids of Ethiopia or Mansa Musa, or hell even one about the Christianization of Kongo.
There's a rich history full of fascinating people that isn't ever explored on television.
I will never understand why "woke" types want to change existing historical figures in media, rather than campaign for historical shows about the larger than life figures in their own race
If you're really that determined, why not do a film on some actual black figure in history? I mean, Cleopatra has been done so many freaking times -- why reinvent the wheel?
This is literally cultural appropriation. Stealing the history of another race for profit and propaganda.
This shit is why i'm more and more in favor of radical solutionsvto problems out there because too many outhere aretoo far gone for softer approachesIt's basically what they did with Assassins Creed Odyssey though. There's that video about "Diversity and Inclusion" training the team got that told them straight out "muh inclusion" came before historical fact.
Of course it will. There will always be illegal immigration. The question is how much.It will still be somewhat porous even if the wall is built. Trump has already said that it won't be a continuous structure. I'm curious about just how much of it needs to be built by 2020 for him to legitimately claim that he has fulfilled his promise to build the wall.
That's called a chokepoint.
That's clearly a dude, and I demand he be played by one in the movie. For diversity's sake.Cleopatra was Greek though.
Take a look at the bust carved when she visited Rome. We know exactly who she was, and it wasn't black.
![]()
In the 1980s, the South Africans made a pretty good historical drama TV miniseries about the bloody reign of Shaka Zulu. Initially I didn't think I would be that interested in the dynastic feuding and court intrigue of a bunch of literal Bantu spearchuckers, but I ended up watching the whole thing from start to finish. But the Shaka Zulu story is pretty well documented as far as indigenous African epics go, thanks to the frequent visits of European traders and missionaries to Zululand back then.Big problem is African written history didn't start until the late middle ages and that was them getting cucks by arabs. After that a few random kingdoms and wat not. Not a very deep well of written history to draw epics from. I suppose they could try the oral mythologies, but again this runs into the problem that western, middle eastern, and Asian mythos were all written down and provides another deep well to draw on.
If you're really that determined, why not do a film on some actual black figure in history? I mean, Cleopatra has been done so many freaking times -- why reinvent the wheel?
She did much better than most of her relatives. She just took over Egypt at a time when it was pretty much hopeless.If you cared at all about historical accuracy you'd be more upset that they keep portraying Cleopatra as an intelligent and capable ruler instead of a stupid inbred bitch.
She did much better than most of her relatives. She just took over Egypt at a time when it was pretty much hopeless.
Most of her relatives were even stupider inbred bitches.
You've gotten extremely boring in your old age.
we continue to favour light-skinned BAME actors, even when they’re supposed to be portraying dark-skinned people on-screen.
Most of her relatives were even stupider inbred bitches.
She did much better than most of her relatives. She just took over Egypt at a time when it was pretty much hopeless.
She was probably a 6/10 with makeup but apparently had an incredibly sexy manner that overcame her plain looks. The right actress could pull that off but I doubt they'll find one.She was ugly as sin, though. And no way will they be historically accurate about that, because nobody wants to spend two hours looking at some uggo.
Based and Redpilled Cato the Younger remains best Roman.The Ptolemies were basically the Mediterranean's punching bag. The Romans largely considered them degenerate. Cato hated them enough that when a Ptolemaic king (IIRC Cleopatra's dad but it might've been one of her brothers) came asking for a favor, he held the audience on the shitter.
Im pretty sure the Punching back was to the east, The Seleucid empire was just pathetic. 250 years of turning stuff to shit ending in a giant clusterfuck of getting your own men stampeded by your war elephants.The Ptolemies were basically the Mediterranean's punching bag. The Romans largely considered them degenerate. Cato hated them enough that when a Ptolemaic king (IIRC Cleopatra's dad but it might've been one of her brothers) came asking for a favor, he held the audience on the shitter.