Coercion and Sexual Assault -

[Zero Day Defense]

If coercion (e.g. by blackmail) into sex makes the act constitute sexual assault, what would people think if the blackmail being used was the fact that the victim sexually assaulted the now-perpetrator? What if, to an arbitrary recursive depth, they're blackmailing each other with the fact that the other assaulted them?

 

[Penis Drager]

If coercion (e.g. by blackmail) into sex makes the act constitute sexual assault, what would people think if the blackmail being used was the fact that the victim sexually assaulted the now-perpetrator? What if, to an arbitrary recursive depth, they're blackmailing each other with the fact that the other assaulted them?

Penis haver=bad guy
Vagina haver=dindu nuffin

That's really all the context you need 90% of the time.

 

[TFT-A9]

Man, that ain't no way to have a healthy relationship

 

[The Empirical Bogey]

If coercion (e.g. by blackmail) into sex makes the act constitute sexual assault, what would people think if the blackmail being used was the fact that the victim sexually assaulted the now-perpetrator? What if, to an arbitrary recursive depth, they're blackmailing each other with the fact that the other assaulted them?

If only Null would give us back Thunk-Provoking.

 

[ResurrectedFerret]

Duuuude, thats fucking so deep brooooo whoa!

 

[Ughubughughughughughghlug]

If somebody raped you, it's okay to rape them back.

 

[Johan Schmidt]

At that point it just sounds like a case of domestic violence. Both the original victim and the original perpetrator are engaged in a mutually destructive relationship.

 

[mate]

"There are no bad tactics, only bad targets." - Jesus Christ

 

[Bad Gateway]

OP doesn't know how to pick ex girlfriends

 

[Slimy Time]

Penis haver=bad guy
Vagina haver=dindu nuffin

That's really all the context you need 90% of the time.

Not even a joke in some countries, like jolly old England.

Rape​

(1)A person (A) commits an offence if—

(a)he intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis,

(b)B does not consent to the penetration, and

(c)A does not reasonably believe that B consents.

(2)Whether a belief is reasonable is to be determined having regard to all the circumstances, including any steps A has taken to ascertain whether B consents.

(3)Sections 75 and 76 apply to an offence under this section.

(4)A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable, on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for life.

For a country that is as woke as England, they still keep this fucking outdated definition of rape.

 

[Lemmingwise]

If coercion (e.g. by blackmail) into sex makes the act constitute sexual assault, what would people think if the blackmail being used was the fact that the victim sexually assaulted the now-perpetrator? What if, to an arbitrary recursive depth, they're blackmailing each other with the fact that the other assaulted them?

At that point they're just having sex with more foreplay.