Exactly. It's his own fault for jumping on the tucute anti-gatekeeping bandwagon. This false narrative, "Nyk is crying on the floor popping Xanax because he's scared that his mantits will deflate if he doesn't eat handfuls of tittie skittles for a few weeks while he's getting the snip", is plainly ridiculous. Nyk is freaking out because shit just got too real. Popping pills to grow tits and having sex with Tinder dates was fun for a while, but now he's gonna have to get rid of the dick to keep the LARP going, so he's in shock that he let it get to this point, but he apparently thinks he can drag himself through it with black humour and Xanax then he's just traumatizing himself. Like I said, no sympathy, because when you go around lying to people your lies will eventually catch up with you. You set that train in motion and now it won't stop. Woopsie.He's going to want to go back eventually. About the time he decides to take therapy for his crippling depression, it's going to be too late.
He should have taken therapy before the hormones.
God boogie is a fat fuck and even when its other cringetubers like Dan Olson and co dunking on him its satisfying.They're being ironic, mocking Boogie's genuine claim that he found it hard to make friends with people who weren't YouTube stars, or whatever he said.
Id say it is because libertarianism attracts a few types of personalities one of which is really elitist people who like the idea of removing anti-discrimination laws and the "get off my property mentality" who will move to the alt right but the movement also attracts other people with more apathetic or more autisticly "rational" personalities who are less likely to become alt right.
lol that's so self aware and funny. I gotta rethink some shit about myself.I have a lot of common ground with centrist libertarians but in the end I’m not much of a libertarian because I naturally have far too much interest in other people’s business. I probably wouldn’t even be here if I didn’t
This guy can't even handle having his blood taken without fainting but he wants to get SRS...I went to do my blood test today and I literally fainted.
I'm a very delicate biological gentlewoman. Bring me my smelling salts.
Just like a true and honest woman, fainting at the slightest whisper of something unfavorable and unladylike.I went to do my blood test today and I literally fainted.
I'm a very delicate biological gentlewoman. Bring me my smelling salts.
This guy can't even handle having his blood taken without fainting but he wants to get SRS...
That's pretty much how the wave of Skpetics post-AA were at the start iirc. Give it maybe two years max and most if not all of leftube will have Sargon-tier controversies under their belt. They already have the personality for it, and while they might be able to ride a wave on Trump's re-election, I'm absolutely sure there will be exposure for profiteering or faking viewpoints after some kind of drama and falling out.That’s the entirety of leftube, over and over and over again. “Critique thing that sounds rational to criticize while my political movement and I exclusively do only that thing.” People like Contra are attempting (often successfully) to covert people through the claim that they’re normal.
That's a laugh about threatening self harm to get hrt under informed consent...One of the first things I ever posted in this thread was the livestream that Nyk did with Milo Stewart where Nyk admitted that he was never officially diagnosed with gender dysphoria, that he ordered HRT from the darknet, self-medicated with the internet HRT for about two months, then went to an informed consent clinic and threatened to self-harm with the internet HRT if they didn't put him on medical grade HRT. (Jamie Shupe, the NB detransitioner, recently did a Livestream interview where he revealed that he originally got on HRT the same way as Nyk: he went to an informed consent clinich and threatened to self-harm with internet HRT in order to be put on medical grade HRT under their harm minimization protocol. Apparently this is commonly exploited loophole that transtrenders abuse to get on HRT without an official gender dysphoria diagnosis.)
Or maybe Nyk could try asking actual "TERFs" what lead them to peak trans... but I guess we can't have that in the current year!Did you use to be a TERF or "gender critical" feminist? I'd like to hear from you! Let me know: what experiences/thoughts/feelings led you to sympathize with the "gender critical" point of view? What made you question that point of view or helped you change your mind?
What a fitting book to read just before your sex change surgery... he should just make an old school clickbait video titled "I Read The Transsexual Empire So You Don't Have To". Why is he even reading this 1979 book? None of the ex-TERFs on Twitter who responded to him said they read it or that it made them peaktrans. TERFs nowadays don't need to read a book from 1979 to learn what trans people are really like, all they have to do is go on Twitter and Youtube and see with their own eyes what trans people are like, what image they choose to put out there of themselves. This book really isn't "the TERF maker" that Nyk thinks it is. The social media and Youtube are the contemporary TERF makers because they give direct and unfiltered access to trans people. That's all a TERF needs to see to peaktrans.He should review the very uplifting book the Holy Quran next just to make his followers happy
Here are some facts about the historical context of The Transsexual Empire, none of which Nyk will bother to point out or go into when he misrepresents a book from 1979 to his audience:It's also a way to avoid arguing with actual people and their arguments, instead Contra can argue with this book from 1979. All while implying it has some kind of sinister motive behind existing that's deluding well meaning people into TERF evil. It wouldn't be surprising if the entire point was to argue with this book using an argument long ago constructed, and the request for people to write in is simply to add color around the fact that he's arguing with this book.
This one is so fucked up and yet the sheer lack of empathy from the established far-left for people they call “TERFs” is just nauseating. A good chunk of those “TERFs” don’t even call themselves feminists, and yet they are “trans-exclusionary radical feminists” for asking questions. TERFs definitely exist, but it’s become a box to automatically push everyone you don’t like into.VCRs were a still a new technology and so was video porn. Video porn made lesbianism readily available to curious men for the first time in human history. Before video, any man who wanted to see women engaged in lesbian acts (illegal and a social taboo) had to visit a sex club or engage the services of prostitutes. Now for the first time ever a man who was curious about the most taboo/illegal sex acts did not have to go out to find them but could view lesbian sex in the privacy of his own home. This new availability of lesbianism through the medium of video - while homosexuality was still illegal in many places - no doubt made lesbians feel exposed and vulnerable, feeding into their feelings that they were being targeted by lecherous men with a new found lesbo fetish.
You see I on the right too when they point to Frankfurt school texts as the holy bibles of postmodern cultural Marxism despite the fact that people like Adorno were modernists who hated postmodernism (but contrary to leftytube’s claims there are Postmodern Marxists just as there are anti and non Marxist postmodernists). You see it too with certain right wing figures like Mencius Moldbug or Hans Herman Hoppe (neither of which are even full alt right) being singled out as the intellectual justification for the alt right. Most of these youtubers and their viewers want to seem like high iq philosophers, as philosophy has become fashionable again, but don’t want to do the actual hard reading nessicary to understand it so they just find some way to simplify movements to one or two books. It also plays of off people’s disgust reflex by allowing them to put all their in hate in a specific movement, book, or person which is nicer to believe then that everything impacts everything and you can’t really simplify things that way.There is a... "fetish" among a certain set of "intellectuals" who desire to find everything leading back to some older book that's THE BIBLE FOR [X]. There was a small kerfuffle when that nutty Russian writers one book from the 1990s was discovered by Western media who claimed it was the guidebook to the secret Russian plot to rule the world even though the guy is super obscure even among nutty Russians. Every so often somebody like The New Yorker will run a piece finding some "ideological foundational work" for whatever right-wing trend they're most on about currently. Like there was supposedly some book CENTRAL to the TEA PARTY'S EXTREMISM that got peddled around, when you could just look at Tea Party rallies, or later the Trump rallies or QAnon crap and see pretty clearly that none of them are reading some stupid failed tome from two decades ago, let alone worshiping it. You have the same kind of thing sometimes like with that Thomas Piketty book nobody really read (and was a failure in France) but the Democratic Party/Obama was supposedly following the text.
It's probably some kind of comforting mechanism to say nobody truly believes in this, it's all because of some book that's hoodwinked them and if we can just debunk that book The People will see the light. Atheist circles and religious circles both often fall into this trap probably most obviously.
It's also a way to avoid arguing with actual people and their arguments, instead Contra can argue with this book from 1979. All while implying it has some kind of sinister motive behind existing that's deluding well meaning people into TERF evil. It wouldn't be surprising if the entire point was to argue with this book using an argument long ago constructed, and the request for people to write in is simply to add color around the fact that he's arguing with this book.
Terf is just a magical word at this point. The political connotations to leftists are much stronger then just trans exclusionary radical feminists. It represents someone who is hateful, denies science, is stupid, overly religious, snobby, and lots of other negotiable traits far beyond just hating trans people: it’s just become like racist or alt-right at this pointThis one is so fucked up and yet the sheer lack of empathy from the established far-left for people they call “TERFs” is just nauseating. A good chunk of those “TERFs” don’t even call themselves feminists, and yet they are “trans-exclusionary radical feminists” for asking questions. TERFs definitely exist, but it’s become a box to automatically push everyone you don’t like into.