Wow how can she deny the science like that! I mean it's her job to help collect the data to inform the science, but in this case the conclusion is already sanctified by the Fauci himself, so clearly she's a heretic and should lose her loicense.
WSJ: The Science Suggests a Wuhan Lab Leak said:The possibility that the pandemic began with an escape from the Wuhan Institute of Virology is attracting fresh attention. President Biden has asked the national intelligence community to redouble efforts to investigate.
Much of the public discussion has focused on circumstantial evidence: mysterious illnesses in late 2019; the lab’s work intentionally supercharging viruses to increase lethality (known as “gain of function” research). The Chinese Communist Party has been reluctant to release relevant information. Reports based on U.S. intelligence have suggested the lab collaborated on projects with the Chinese military.
But the most compelling reason to favor the lab leak hypothesis is firmly based in science. In particular, consider the genetic fingerprint of CoV-2, the novel coronavirus responsible for the disease Covid-19.
Great update, and I wonder if it's also their means of trying to get into the burgeoning market for this vaccine.So most people probably aren’t aware, but a vaccine has been developed and is being produced here, QazVac.
[...]
I am still surprised it was able to be produced and used at all honestly.
No idea. What's the difference between the NovaVax formula and the mRNA tech?So NovaVax is in Phase 3 right now.
What do you all think?
Is it safer than mRNA vaccine?
NovaVax is using the traditional method (using dead virus)No idea. What's the difference between the NovaVax formula and the mRNA tech?
The Mask mandates were pointless from day one...I feel like the mask mandate was called off way too early by their standards.
Hypothesis: they're intentionally dropping the defenses before enough are vaccinated to cause another surge. Then they use that to make it mandatory.
You mean like "scientists" like Dr. Fauci who got caught lying about Covid?Hello, newfag! Why did you decide to register here? And more importantly, why do you trust delusional schizo retards like OP over actual scientists and doctors?
Oh, and
View attachment 2207594
Did he? What did he lie about and where's your proof?You mean like "scientists" like Dr. Fauci who got caught lying about Covid?
Exactly. The dozen reasons why are largely irrelevant. The fact that the oh-so-scary "spread" had no statistically significant difference in mask mandate vs non-mask mandate areas bears this out. I personally don't even care if the vaccine is as safe as thrice-sterilized and perfectly balanced placebo saline in a needle. I'm in zero risk categories for this overhyped cold. I likely already have antibodies for it (though I haven't checked. Does anyone go get a test to make sure they have the latest rhinovirus antibodies for the year?). If my governor told me to bend over so he can paddle my ass while I say "thank you sir, may I have another" and double pinky promised I'd be allowed to walk around without a diaper on my face if I did so, I'd tell him to choke to death on my dick. This applies to him doing it figuratively too, in needle form.The Mask mandates were pointless from day one...
HUGE update to the Science section of the OP. Would really like to hear @Secret Asshole on this one since it relates directly to what we were discussing regarding the vaccines, the Spike Protein and other elements of the vaccine itself with relation to risk factors for severe reactions, etc. Also if @Abracadabra could dig up any further info it would be great.
On to it: The first doctor I've been alerted to who makes statements about the S protein in the vaccines and the inflammation subject is Dr. Bryam Bridle. His assessment and mention of the Japanese study into the Pfizer vaccine here:
What I was originally alerted to by @Lichen Bark however is this:
I'm more focused on the science here but the video also delves into the potential censorship of doctors and scientists on this subject, etc. More info (and archives) can be found in the OP under the Science spoiler.
byram bridle comes on
heart inflamation and vaccine
how quickly the smear campaign and the threats started after mentioning the heart inflamation
his website and guide for parents canadiancovidcarealliance.org
Says to not vaccinate kids until better safety testing, lipid nanoparticles DO go all over the body, as little as 25% of the dose stays in shoulder
the lipid nanoparticles can cross the blood brain barrier
attacks the testing of the vaccines, lack of modelling, only done in rats, they have only evaluated the lipid particles, not the actual mRNA component
talks about inadequate reproductive effect testing
stresses the urgent need to not vaccinate healthy children yet
talks about his career in jeopardy over this, how scientists and doctors are being supressed
Dr. Patrick Phillips comes on, emergency room doctor, doctor regulatory body threatening doctors over alternative treatments, vaccine risks, discusses harms of lockdowns, ivermectin and vitamin D benefits
Ivermectin 75% reduction in COVID-19 mortality, vitamin D mortality reduction
DR. Welsh on how science is being ignored
On the level of censorship in Canada, and metions the vaccines are not fully approved, dangers of mixing politics and medicine
Thoughts?
Archive:On to it: The first doctor I've been alerted to who makes statements about the S protein in the vaccines and the inflammation subject is Dr. Bryam Bridle. His assessment and mention of the Japanese study into the Pfizer vaccine here:
What I was originally alerted to by @Lichen Bark however is this:
Yeah, it's hard to argue this isn't political when people (including healthcare workers) are shamed for even mild expressions of "vaccine hesitancy", but flat out worship is perfectly fine:I'm more focused on the science here but the video also delves into the potential censorship of doctors and scientists on this subject, etc.
Nazi propaganda is getting strange.Archive:
View attachment 2276513
Yeah, it's hard to argue this isn't political when people (including healthcare workers) are shamed for even mild expressions of "vaccine hesitancy", but flat out worship is perfectly fine:
View attachment 2276536
Beyond creepy
Apparently its doing great so far and even had the endorsement from the inventor of the mRNA vaccine, which he calls the "gene vaccine"NovaVax is using the traditional method (using dead virus)
Western Journal said:But Malone’s wariness coincides with the development of a “traditional” vaccine introduced by the U.S.-based company Novavax that’s now being labeled the “Coronavax.”
According to TrialSite News, this traditional vaccine “demonstrated 100% protection against moderate and severe disease” and “90.4% overall efficacy,” keeping this “Coronavax” competitive with mRNA-based vaccines and superior to the Adenovirus-based Johnson & Johnson vaccine.
I don't remember the media ever being so overt as this in my dystopian fiction novels. But you're right, it goes from laughably embarrassing to outright horrifying considering the broader context. It's like propaganda for dummies.Beyond creepy
Guaranteed it was about testing what that protein could accomplish with a virus. Something like that.I'm pretty well fucking convinced that the gain of function research going on in China was looking for something like the spike protein
This is why I said from the start that complete testing was necessary, since these revelations of the spike protein and so much else didn't exist by the time the vaccines were being developed and rolled out within what seemed like months of production. It's also why certain scientists are ardently warning against these vaccines, most surprisingly being the inventor of the technology.Another thought; the spike protein can apparently cross the blood-brain barrier when it is unencumbered by being attached to the nucleosome of the virus, while when attached to the actual virus it is incapable of this feat.
Good question. It's always about risk analysis but with these increasingly concerning factors coming in--no longer simply a matter of rare instances of death by blood clots--it's not so simple anymore, even if you happen to be someone who's in the demographic to be at risk from Covid-19.Why the fuck would I take the vaccine knowing that the toxic protein it produces through mRNA has more leeway to fuck up my body?
If a retard on Youtube is talking about some random website which is quoting another Youtube video, you know it's a legit source