Kiwi Farms

SPIKE PROTEIN STUDY, VASCULAR DISEASE & VACCINES (& CDC Investigation into myocarditis in vaccinated teens)

SARS-CoV-2's S protein (Spike protein) causes cellular damage even on its own (without virus), published scientific study proves. This also proves Covid-19 is a "vascular disease". Note that all four covid vaccine brands cause the vaccinated patient's body's cells to "express" the spike proteins which the aforementioned study proved was alone capable of causing vascular damage and related events (such as blood clots). Even without the virus the S protein can cause severe damage.
Full breakdown can be found here. Simpler post with info HERE.
Archives: Published Study https://archive.md/xIaoS , Salk Institute explanation https://archive.md/hgjK4 , Salk-linked article on vax https://archive.md/TNiEl
Credit to @Oliveoil for bringing it up in the other thread. Credit to @Devyn for the initial news article ( Archive )

CDC's VaST advisory committee finds myocarditis to be potential adverse effect of vaccines in kids (after recommending ages 12-15+ get vaccinated less than a month prior, the FDA giving emergency approval to do so

Preliminary report details potential adverse reaction of myocarditis from vaccination in teenagers and adolescents, particularly male. Reports arise roughly 4 days after second shot. I also provided info on what myocarditis is and what diagnosis and treatment entails. Post going into deeper detail is here. No mention of Spike protein study or any potential correlation.
Archive: CDC report https://archive.md/jmDpX

Here's an excerpt from a great post with another perspective on this subject (and vaccine adjuvants) courtesy of @Secret Asshole

Secret Asshole said:

All I'm saying is if you picture the Spike proteins like a drug, they're half-life is 10 minutes. As in, in 10 minutes 50% of them will be degraded by proteases in the blood. Now mind, it takes 1 minute for blood to fully pump around the body.

My argument is that they're not going to stick around in the body for months or for years. That being said, is it possible for the Spike proteins to stick to the vasculature and provoke an inflammatory immune response? And since the immune response of young people would be stronger? Yes. An immune response can stick around longer than the protein itself, so it could hyper activate, attacking vasculature. It wouldn't be the Spike protein itself responsible, but the excessive immune response. You also have to understand, even if the Spike protein is gone, an immune response doesn't just stop. There's a ramp up time. So it ramps up in two days, excessively attacks the vasculature and symptoms appear two days later. Despite most of the mRNA and Spike sticking around at the injection site, some makes it into the plasma. You also have to remember, its not the Spike protein doing the damage, its our immune response to it.

Click to expand...

In another post he also mentions that all the vaccines contain Polyethylene Glycol and links a study from 2018 on "Physician Awareness of Immune Responses to Polyethylene Glycol-Drug Conjugates". Archive.
In his words:

Secret Asshole said:

In all honesty, we can't know if the reaction [in reference to Bad Take Crucifier's partner's ongoing reaction to the Moderna vaccine] was from the mRNA itself, the Spike protein or even one of the other constituents of the vaccine. The COVID vaccine contains Polyethylene Glycol. It sounds bad, but it is literally in everything. It could be that they were sensitized to that and is having an immune response to that.

Click to expand...

Dr. Bryam Bridle, lipid nanoparticles in Covid vax, vaccinating children & Canadian MP Derek Sloan on the censorship of scientists (Jan 17, 21)
Courtesy of @Lichen Bark -- Video has Dr. Byram Bridle (Professor of Viral Immunology, University of Guelph) (who previous spoke on the Spike proteins in the vaccine) making public statements on data. A couple other doctors talk about ivermectin, etc. Dr. Bridle calls for a halt on vaccinating the kids until a higher safety level for the vaccine is achieved. Also publicly says the lipid nanoparticles in the vaccine do go everywhere, including the brain, and references the Japanese study of Pfizer's vaccine.
[Note: Study is in Japanese, acquired by Dr. Bridle via "Freedom of Information" request. Apparently this is the English translation of the study]
Radio interview with Dr. Bryam Bridle on the Spike Protein danger in Covid vaccine and its correlation to heart inflammation, blood clots, vascular issues and potential female infertility:



Both Pfizer & Moderna Vaccines Can Cause Side Effect Resembling Breast Cancer
As of February 2021 there has been a trickling influx of vaccinated female patients reporting a scary lump near their armpit region.

Credit to @Abracadabra

Inventor of mRNA Vaccine, Dr. Robert Malone, voices concern about post-COVID genetic vaccine syndromes, calls for transparency (also brief insight into "traditional vaccine" alternative NovaVax)

The article from the Western Journal references several twitter posts from Dr. Malone where he raises questions about the scientific community and the mRNA vaccines, particularly with regard to concern about the gene vaccines' potential ramifications.
His full name is Dr. Robert Malone and he really is the inventor of the mRNA vaccine technology. He also happens to be retweeting, posting and writing about the politicization of the subject while raising awareness--yet again--to the Spike protein subject, this time citing the same study as the OP from the Salk Institute (which he worked for in 1988, where he apparently invented the mRNA vax tech).

“Regarding post-COVID genetic vaccine syndromes. I know they happen, do not know how severe or frequent,” he wrote. “I argue for data transparency from @CDCGlobal @CDCgov and #QALY based risk/benefit assessment. Data. Science-based Medicine. Honesty. Transparency. Bioethics. Not conspiracy.” -Dr. Malone

With regards to the upcoming contender for Covid vaccination, the NovaVax vaccine, the article states:

Western Journal said:

But Malone’s wariness coincides with the development of a “traditional” vaccine introduced by the U.S.-based company Novavax that’s now being labeled the “Coronavax.”
According to TrialSite News, this traditional vaccine “demonstrated 100% protection against moderate and severe disease” and “90.4% overall efficacy,” keeping this “Coronavax” competitive with mRNA-based vaccines and superior to the Adenovirus-based Johnson & Johnson vaccine.

Click to expand...

Ultimately his major concern--much the like aforementioned Dr. Byram Bridle--is with regards to a lack of sufficient safety testing, lack of transparency in scientific study, the politicization of bias regarding the vaccines and the widespread notice of side effects (blood clots, myocarditis, etc.) which may be caused by the Spike protein in the vaccine or other elements of it, among other subjects.


Recent commentary publication in The Lancet (major scientific journal) details how the current reporting methods for Covid vaccine efficacy are leading to bias and being informed by "uncoordinated" scientific trials
Archive: https://archive.md/hf7nU
Excerpts: [note: RRR is "Relative Risk Reduction", ARR is "Absolute Risk Reduction"]

ARRs tend to be ignored [in reports] because they give a much less impressive effect size than RRRs: 1·3% for the AstraZeneca–Oxford, 1·2% for the Moderna–NIH, 1·2% for the J&J, 0·93% for the Gamaleya, and 0·84% for the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccines. ARR is also used to derive an estimate of vaccine effectiveness, which is the number needed to vaccinate (NNV) to prevent one more case of COVID-19 as 1/ARR.

Click to expand...

There are many lessons to learn from the way studies are conducted and results are presented. With the use of only RRRs, and omitting ARRs, reporting bias is introduced, which affects the interpretation of vaccine efficacy.10 When communicating about vaccine efficacy, especially for public health decisions such as choosing the type of vaccines to purchase and deploy, having a full picture of what the data actually show is important, and ensuring comparisons are based on the combined evidence that puts vaccine trial results in context and not just looking at one summary measure, is also important. Such decisions should be properly informed by detailed understanding of study results, requiring access to full datasets and independent scrutiny and analyses.

Click to expand...

Unfortunately, comparing vaccines on the basis of currently available trial (interim) data is made even more difficult by disparate study protocols, including primary endpoints (such as what is considered a COVID-19 case, and when is this assessed), types of placebo, study populations, background risks of COVID-19 during the study, duration of exposure, and different definitions of populations for analyses both within and between studies, as well as definitions of endpoints and statistical methods for efficacy. Importantly, we are left with the unanswered question as to whether a vaccine with a given efficacy in the study population will have the same efficacy in another population with different levels of background risk of COVID-19.

Click to expand...

Enclosed at the bottom in the OP is a PDF of the publication. Credit to @knobslobbin
Edit: Another commentary (below) voicing concern and counterpoint to the above publication: Credit to @Abracadabra who also has a lot of information, links and counterpoints for context and balance in his posts ITT, worth the read.
NACI Recommendation and Risk Analysis

Canada's NACI (highest authority on vaccines) gave their recommendation about the Astra Zeneca vax. Twitter mobs calling them all "anti-vax" for it.
Credit to @Sweet Yuzu

The UK's AstraZeneca Vaccine has been Banned in 18 Countries, including France, Germany, two weeks in Spain, Italy, etc. over concern of blood clots
Archives: https://archive.md/1VCLq , https://archive.md/S0Zx7

The Problem of Current Vaccines Needing Even More R&D Against SARS-CoV-2 variants

Archived WebMD article: https://archive.md/dXNn3

EXCERPT: Of the three "variants of concern" recognized by the World Health Organization and the CDC, studies have shown that the mRNA vaccines created by Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna, as well as the Novavax vaccine, remain highly effective against the B.1.1.7 variant, which was first recognized in the United Kingdom.
The mRNA vaccines are 4- to 7-fold less effective against the P.1 variant, which was first discovered in Brazil, but they still appear to be within an important "cushion of protection," particularly after two doses, and should prevent disease, according to Anthony Fauci, MD, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

Click to expand...

The B.1.351 variant is more troublesome. Studies have shown that the AstraZeneca vaccine was 86 times less effective against this variant, which was first detected in South Africa. The mRNA vaccines are 6- to 8-fold less effective against this variant, suggesting a significant waning of protection. In clinical trials in South Africa, the Johnson & Johnson vaccine also was less effective where this variant was surging.

Click to expand...

Mass Misinterpretation of Covid Diagnosis with PCR Testing
Nobel laureate and inventor of the PCR test, Biochemist Kary Mullis, explains that the PCR test does not prove you are sick/going to be harmed

Here is another video explaining it:
Credit to @Devyn

CDC USED DATA FROM SINGAPORE TO EXAGGERATE OUTDOOR COVID TRANSMISSION RISK (masks more effective indoors/in crowds)

Archive of full article: https://archive.md/JrC6I

COVID19 Wuhan Lab Escape Theory is Viable Backed by Science
https://archive.md/KMQD9
Not only does SARS-CoV-2 contain genetic fingerprints of lab origin but said genome provides evidence suggesting "gain of function" research (see more in the spoiler below). The science itself says the Covid virus is not of natural origin.

UNIQUE INDEMNIFICATION

Above Article said:

“It is very rare for a blanket immunity law to be passed,” said Rogge Dunn, a Dallas labor and employment attorney. “Pharmaceutical companies typically aren’t offered much liability protection under the law.“

You also can’t sue the Food and Drug Administration for authorizing a vaccine for emergency use, nor can you hold your employer accountable if they mandate inoculation as a condition of employment.
...
In February, Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar invoked the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act. The 2005 law empowers the HHS secretary to provide legal protection to companies making or distributing critical medical supplies, such as vaccines and treatments, unless there’s “willful misconduct” by the company. The protection lasts until 2024. That means that for the next four years, these companies “cannot be sued for money damages in court” over injuries related to the administration or use of products to treat or protect against Covid.

“When the government said, ‘We want you to develop this four or five times faster than you normally do,’ most likely the manufacturers said to the government, ‘We want you, the government, to protect us from multimillion-dollar lawsuits,’” said Dunn.
“The government doesn’t want people suing the companies making the Covid vaccine. Because then, the manufacturers would probably charge the government a higher price per person per dose,” Dunn explained.

Remember, vaccine manufacturers aren’t the ones approving their product for mass distribution. That is the job of the FDA.
Which begs the question, can you sue the U.S. government if you have an extraordinarily bad reaction to a vaccine?
“You can’t sue the FDA for approving or disapproving a drug,” said Dorit Reiss, a professor at the University of California Hastings College of Law. “That’s part of its sovereign immunity.”



_.

Click to expand...

AnOminous said:

Wow, expressing this as it actually is sounds super fucking sketchy, doesn't it?

Click to expand...

Pfizer's Previous Nigerian Lawsuit (experimental antibiotics)
Pfizer settled out of court for £50 Million for killing 11 children, causing organ failure, brain damage to many more in Nigeria with experimental antibiotics.
https://archive.md/TMkg5

Above Article said:

The US-based company sent a team of its doctors into the Nigerian slum city of Kano in the midst of an appaling meningitis epidemic to perform what it calls a "humanitarian mission". However the accusers claim it was an unlicensed medical trial on critically-ill children.

A team of Pfizer doctors reached the Nigerian camp just as the outbreak, which killed at least 11,000 people, was peaking. They set themselves up within metres of a medical station run by the aid group Médecins Sans Frontières, which was dispensing proven treatments to ease the epidemic.

From the crowd that had gathered at the Kano Infectious Diseases Hospital, 200 sick children were picked. Half were given doses of the experimental Pfizer drug called Trovan and the others were treated with a proven antibiotic from a rival company.

Eleven of the children died and many more, it is alleged, later suffered serious side-effects ranging from organ failure to brain damage. But with meningitis, cholera and measles still raging and crowds still queueing at the fence of the camp, the Pfizer team packed up after two weeks and left.

That would probably have been an end to the story if it weren't for Pfizer employee, Juan Walterspiel. About 18 months after the medical trial he wrote a letter to the then chief executive of the company, William Steere, saying that the trial had "violated ethical rules". Mr Walterspiel was fired a day later for reasons "unrelated" to the letter, insists Pfizer.
...
At stake at one point last year was more than $8bn in punitive damages being sought in a string of cases, as well as potential jail terms in Nigeria for several Pfizer staff.
...
Trovan never became the blockbuster that Pfizer had hoped for and it is no longer in production. The EU has banned the drug and it has been withdrawn from sale in the US.



_.

Click to expand...

Credit to @Lawrence of Algeria

Johnson & Johnson $2 Billion Lawsuit for Causing Ovarian Cancer with their Talc Powder

Especially note timestamp 11:08

Information Censorship and Recontextualizing: "Vaccine Hesitancy" pushed by Silicon Valley, Facebook algorithm targets vaccine concern posts

Facebook (and Instagram)'s new algorithm targets posts sharing concern about the Covid vaccines (and all vaccines as well), especially posts sharing videos, articles or scientific studies detailing side effects or deaths. The above "Context" blurb is from Youtube. Google is now implementing this blurb under certain videos about Covid vaccination concern. Both conflate the subject with concern about all vaccines. The Youtube info blurb links to a CDC list which is meant to reassure people about taking vaccines--despite one key reassurance being the safety measures taken in years of testing.

It's uber-vax mentality in Silicon Valley with social media. This is why I've re-posted and archived so much, just in case anything happens in the future.

SILICON VALLEY & VACCINE PASSPORTS

Archives https://archive.md/pFeeA (another article from April 2021: https://archive.md/UrI2w )
Tech industry giants of Silicon Valley like Microsoft are being deeply involved in the digitization of vaccine passports so their use (and necessity) can be part of everyday life. Other companies are eager for a centralized service of your medical information regarding test results and vaccine record so that you can show it like a QR code, with enough details that someone could see what kind of vaccine you got. All of this is pushed as part of a "necessity" for public health, so we can ride airplanes, go back to school, back to work, etc.

"VAXED OR MASKED"
As of 5/13/2021, the rule from President Biden's own mouth is "Get vaccinated or wear a mask. It's vax-ed or masked."

CDC WARNS OF "IMPENDING DOOM" IN MARCH "as Covid Cases Spike"--THEN SAYS OTHERWISE BY MAY

https://archive.md/YEMRo https://archive.md/gzyUW
Credit to @ShortBusDriver