How the fuck does a human being manage to be more pretentious than Tyson?
Was Tyson really a creep to women, or is Olson making stuff up?Here's Dan correcting Neil DeGrasse Tyson. It's interesting because in the very next tweet he says he's only doing it because Tyson 'was a creep' to women, and Dan is a protector of the ladies. It's interesting because it implies that if Dan has a problem with someone he'll happily attack them for something completely separate.
I suspect Dan's really problem with Tyson is that he's criticized wokeness and constant race baiting. It's not as if there's a shortage of sex pests in the entertainment industry.
View attachment 1160600
The accuser was some real flake. It looked pretty dubious. I mean, she was studying astronomy, then dropped out to become an astrologer instead. Anything to do with stars, it's all the same, right? I mean, I failed chemistry, and now I'm trying to keep Voldemort from getting his hands on my Philosopher's Stone. You know how it goes.He was #metoo'd. No concrete evidence, no official charges that I know of.
Dont you find fascinating when science obssessed plebbitfags worship people like Tyson while humanities obssessed plebbitfags worship the people that hang around with Dan Olson.
Oh, that's why.It's pretty obvious that they have contracts and favors running through the whole group that extend into Cali Tech and Media. Sadpuppies proved that they controlled the Hugo Awards, Contrapoints gets featured articles out of nowhere, Lindsay has links with TOR Books and Disney, she was also photographed with Anita Sarkeesian and regularly pals around with Zoe Quinn who were both part of Google ideas.
That's why you see people like Shoe0nhead trying to suck up to Contra all the time, shes hoping to find an "in", into the group. It's just a clique of narcissists that practice cronyism. They are all being pushed because they have friend who are friends of other friends. It's why when Zoe got attacked, you saw the friends of the friends suddenly shut down the internet to "protect her" from internet trolls. They were able to ask some friends to exploit the situation and turn Zoe into a minor celeb.
His "game" fits this to a tee. He takes that point Jordan Peterson used to harp on about-the balancing act between stability and novelty-& stretched it out as if it were supposed to be some mind-blowing thing rather than some basic shit that everyone innately knows.I'm the exact opposite; I think he says a lot of rather obvious things using the Hambly Method where he'll stretch out something apparent as far as he possibly can. The Book of Henry "analysis" is probably the peak example of it. "The child is adult-like... and the adults are immature?!?!", phenomenal deep dive into the material there, Dan.
He's certainly competent as a presenter, sure. I have yet to see anything that demonstrates any substantial knowledge of movies or even a unique perspective on anything.
Remember, kids - murdering people in the streets over a difference of political ideology is only OK when the LEFT does it!Interesting to see Dan making a simple statement against violent revolution fetishists and then getting blowback from commies, including some blue checkmarks:
View attachment 1700097
Especially so since he might have been referring particularly to Right-wingers, given his preceding tweet lambasting Nate Silver:
View attachment 1700132