What would you like the name of the thread to be changed to? I was going by whatever he was saying but if that's not true, I'll look into it.
You're still crying about him? Are you sure you need to transition because you sound like you have no balls.
Don't be a worthless hypocrite.
17 is legal in my state you dumdum. We are only a few years apart. And if you have to ask how you're a hypocrite, then you lack the self awareness needed for me to even find it worth my time to explain why.
a.) Images and streaming video of under 18 are not legal
Lol like you're going to get to know that.
It was a plain misimpression on Candy's part, that's all.
That's because Giovanna aka. Candy was a histrionic feminist retard from /cow/ who had a very contemptuous view towards both our masculinist politics and got into the anti-autistic trolling game for all the wrong reasons ("autism means male so it's icky!"). David's theoretical contributions were typically tantamount to ripping off the worse/more "accessible" National Socialist theorists which had kind of stunted the self-referential ideology I'd wanted to construct. We had something of several fall-outs during the period of 2013 wherein he'd wanted to self-insert an excessive proportion of his theoreitcally cacophonic gibberish in the Wisdom of Autphag that, needless to say, he didn't get to do, and hence the immemorability and forgettable nature of his non-contributions. You really do have this autistic habit of taking a troll's hyperbole overly seriously.
So what you're saying is you got outclassed by another man's fanfiction?
You can come crash at my Moon pad.
Alan Pardew: @hood LOLCOW, Permathreadbanned him
Lemme translate that:
Wasn't trying to make a statement about the unverified claims in the post, just pointing out the existence of a contrary perspective. She got banned here too, after all.
As far as I know, he never had. You can go to my blog and see one of his most recent statements on the matter. He has given up on the idea that Aspergians can be cogently persuaded to endorse the ideology and is beginning to entertain the possibility of establishing a compound populated by those kidnapped into his "covenant" as it were from youth.
He's given up on theoretical considerations. One of my last exchanges with him in December of last year has him denouncing the philosophical as an overly-sophisticated waste of time that just ends up having the ideology capitulating in acknowledgement to neurotypically phrased terms. He'd rather now that we get practical: leaflet distribution, street-proselytism, think of everything that the likes of the NOI or the scientologists do today.
To answer your question succinctly: he taught me my composition method, which in itself is quite highly derivative of speculative theoresis from the late 19th and early 20th centuries' meta-political and meta-scientific works (as scientific methodical convention was slowly becoming derided for socialistic influences; rightly enough, the main aberrosexual theorist of the era, Hirschfield, was a Marxist Jew). For what mechanical weaknesses he had in his writing (terrible speller for one), he was quite grammatically and rhetorically adroit, if lacking the enudrance, relatively speaking, of my own works.
