Eh, Eli Roth is a lame, edgy, try-hard of a director, so I'm not surprised he'd say something like this.
Eh, Eli Roth is a lame, edgy, try-hard of a director, so I'm not surprised he'd say something like this.
"Wait... a white man does self-defense and tries to find the man who murdered his wife?!? RRRRRREEEEEEE..."
Huh. Self-Defense must be a thing that the libtards hate.
"Wait... a white man does self-defense and tries to find the man who murdered his wife?!? RRRRRREEEEEEE..."
Huh. Self-Defense must be a thing that the libtards hate.
You can whine without guilt about a movie that is 100% fictional no matter how real the events they're based on may be.Some of them seem more offended about a movie than the actual murders in Chicago.
"Remember"?Remember the days when you could enjoy criminal scum getting blown away in movies without having to feel bad about it?
When critics don't like something, there's a good chance that it might actually be good. Keep in mind that so many of these people are hired to try to sway public opinions, not represent public opinions.
Case in point: Ghostbusters 2016.
So are there any negative reviews that don't mention politics? Seriously, I haven't seen any, but you've probably done more digging than I have.
"Dangerously Entertaining" doesn't sound like a bad thing. It sounds like a great marketing tagline to edgy teens who want a movie their mom will hate.
...
Now the real fun is that the regular viewing audience has given the film an over 80% approval rating.



