Debate users Unog and big ups liquid richard about the ethics of lolicon and Venti's stink -

  • There is a bug with the post editor. Images pasted from other websites from your clipboard will automatically use the [img] tag instead of uploading a copy as an attachment. Please manually save the image, upload it to the site, and then insert it as a thumbnail instead if you experience this.

    The [img] should essentially never be used outside of chat. It does not save disk space on the server because we use an image proxy to protect your IP address and to ensure people do not rely on bad third party services like Imgur for image hosting. I hope to have a fix from XF soon.

Chris_Stuckmann

kiwifarms.net
A picture of children having sex, you left that part out.
it definitely is harmful to their psyche, and society as a whole.
Even if you assume that all lolicons are pedophiles (and all furries are animal-fuckers), and I don't think they are, I'd rather have them take it out on a cartoon character than an actual child.
Drawings of child porn is something worth fighting against, although you don't have to be steaming mad to do so. It does make the weebs very pissy though, clearly.
"i'm not mad, you're mad"
 

三字经

Very Ominous Feng Shui
kiwifarms.net
I hate to get back on topic, but Venti is stinky and I would not have sex with her

345EFCD4-2DD4-4D3D-9B0D-43BF05A99132.jpeg
I just wanna watch the Bleach reboot leave me alone
 
Even if you assume that all lolicons are pedophiles (and all furries are animal-fuckers), and I don't think they are, I'd rather have them take it out on a cartoon character than an actual child.
Why can't it be neither. Why do you make us choose?

"i'm not mad, you're mad"
Ok guy who joined today to defend lolicon. Definitely nothing suspicious there.
 

Chris_Stuckmann

kiwifarms.net
Why can't it be neither. Why do you make us choose?
...do you want to start executing people for looking at pictures?
because that's based but actually exceptional
Ok guy who joined today to defend lolicon. Definitely nothing suspicious there.
what is this reddit tier argumentation? Just because somebody's arguing against your absolutist position doesn't make them the scum of the earth
 

Unog

My political affiliation is "rétard"
kiwifarms.net
Even if you assume that all lolicons are pedophiles (and all furries are animal-fuckers), and I don't think they are, I'd rather have them take it out on a cartoon character than an actual child.

That's not even the problem. The problem, fundamentally, is someone getting upset to the point of wanting it to be unlawful at drawings.

This argument's been had enough times on the internet, you can think people who whack it to lolicon are pedos (they are) and still be of the opinion that adult humans shouldn't be this shook by fucking drawings. There's plenty of shit that's not even sexual in nature that's fucked up enough to get the same reaction out of people. It's fucking stupid.

...do you want to start executing people for looking at pictures?
because that's based but actually exceptional

Specifically, not just pictures, drawings. It's asinine.

I hate to get back on topic, but Venti is stinky and I would not have sex with her

View attachment 1612388
I just wanna watch the Bleach reboot leave me alone

I agree, I'd rather get onto the topic of how unbelievably fucking stupid Venti's attempt at gaining more exposure is.
 

Shek$il

MMMMMmmmmmmm...
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
...do you want to start executing people for looking at pictures?
because that's based but actually exceptional

I think you should at least be put on some kind of list of early concerns. If your sexual interest is depictions of kids getting fucked, then I don't think it's unfair to assume you may be interested in... kids being fucked for real.
 

Unog

My political affiliation is "rétard"
kiwifarms.net
You keep trying to compare a depiction of a historical figure with depictions of fucking kids. Its not comparable.

It's people upset at drawings. If you're so passionate how about you start a Deep Thoughts thread about it?

I've done it enough times to know when I and someone else are shitting up a thread with a disagreement of opinion.
 

Chris_Stuckmann

kiwifarms.net
I think you should at least be put on some kind of list of early concerns. If your sexual interest is depictions of kids getting fucked, then I don't think it's unfair to assume you may be interested in... kids being fucked for real.
The majority of women have rape fantasies, by your logic it isn't unfair to assume that most women secretly want to be raped.
 
"I think there's hope left in this world because there's other people who are insane enough to want to ban people making drawn child porn.
You're a fucking exceptional individual, mate.
If that's insane, then call me insane. I think its fine to outlaw child porn, drawn or not.
The majority of women have rape fantasies, by your logic it isn't unfair to assume that most women secretly want to be raped.
Now you're just making stuff up.
 

Unog

My political affiliation is "rétard"
kiwifarms.net
If that's insane, then call me insane.

I don't think you're insane, I think you're overcompensating.

Now if you want to continue this exceptional discussion, if it can be so called, we can continue it in another thread or in PMs. I'd rather not do so here since I and the other good people who browse this subforum have seen enough of this argument elsewhere and don't come to these threads to debate sociopolitical topics that have only tangential relation to the topic of the thread.
 

Chris_Stuckmann

kiwifarms.net
Now you're just making stuff up. Stick to the topic, or quit replying.
Its highly documented. I guess not everyone is as pure as you are.

.
 
Top